F5F Stay Refreshed Software PC Gaming Operating a Minecraft server on an outdated computer.

Operating a Minecraft server on an outdated computer.

Operating a Minecraft server on an outdated computer.

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3
O
OmriDiv
Junior Member
4
06-08-2016, 01:36 AM
#21
minehut isn't very trustworthy, especially since I last used it. I also question whether it would perform better than the PC OP's setup.
O
OmriDiv
06-08-2016, 01:36 AM #21

minehut isn't very trustworthy, especially since I last used it. I also question whether it would perform better than the PC OP's setup.

T
TorJules
Member
184
06-08-2016, 02:26 AM
#22
It seems more secure this time, doesn't really matter if you're just playing with friends. I wasn't trying to be sarcastic, sorry for the confusion.
T
TorJules
06-08-2016, 02:26 AM #22

It seems more secure this time, doesn't really matter if you're just playing with friends. I wasn't trying to be sarcastic, sorry for the confusion.

1
10th_Doctor_
Posting Freak
768
06-09-2016, 04:27 PM
#23
I didn't even perceive it as a joke, huh?
1
10th_Doctor_
06-09-2016, 04:27 PM #23

I didn't even perceive it as a joke, huh?

T
theheadtroll
Junior Member
20
06-25-2016, 04:41 PM
#24
It seems you made an error. Let me know how I can help.
T
theheadtroll
06-25-2016, 04:41 PM #24

It seems you made an error. Let me know how I can help.

M
MacSolaris
Senior Member
457
06-27-2016, 08:55 AM
#25
Here’s a revised version of your text:

The situation depended on who had the most powerful computer available at the time. In recent years, we decided to host a server around the clock because our team grew from four to twelve members, and not everyone’s availability matched. It made sense that no one would want to use their main machine constantly. Over the past few years, we explored various free and paid options. Ultimately, we realized that spending around $7 to $10 each month for a dependable service would be worthwhile. Having been active since 2013, we figured if we were investing about $80 a year, it would already be worthwhile to replace the device. Plus, we didn’t want to deal with service updates, downtime, business closures, or other issues.
M
MacSolaris
06-27-2016, 08:55 AM #25

Here’s a revised version of your text:

The situation depended on who had the most powerful computer available at the time. In recent years, we decided to host a server around the clock because our team grew from four to twelve members, and not everyone’s availability matched. It made sense that no one would want to use their main machine constantly. Over the past few years, we explored various free and paid options. Ultimately, we realized that spending around $7 to $10 each month for a dependable service would be worthwhile. Having been active since 2013, we figured if we were investing about $80 a year, it would already be worthwhile to replace the device. Plus, we didn’t want to deal with service updates, downtime, business closures, or other issues.

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3