F5F Stay Refreshed Software PC Gaming Only 300 frames per second during CS:GO gameplay

Only 300 frames per second during CS:GO gameplay

Only 300 frames per second during CS:GO gameplay

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
L
loltribo
Posting Freak
870
01-07-2020, 12:37 AM
#1
I switched from a 1660S to a 3060Ti and it greatly enhanced my gaming performance. For instance, I can sustain about 240 fps at APEX and 100 FPS with maximum effects on 2077. However, playing CS:GO was disappointing—my normal frame rate was only 300FPS, dropping to 200FPS during intense moments, which is worse than my previous setup. It seems the developers didn’t optimize it well. Your memory stick is 8*2 2666. Can you improve your CS:GO frame rate without changing settings? You might need to adjust in-game or consider a different resolution.
L
loltribo
01-07-2020, 12:37 AM #1

I switched from a 1660S to a 3060Ti and it greatly enhanced my gaming performance. For instance, I can sustain about 240 fps at APEX and 100 FPS with maximum effects on 2077. However, playing CS:GO was disappointing—my normal frame rate was only 300FPS, dropping to 200FPS during intense moments, which is worse than my previous setup. It seems the developers didn’t optimize it well. Your memory stick is 8*2 2666. Can you improve your CS:GO frame rate without changing settings? You might need to adjust in-game or consider a different resolution.

D
DylanPS4
Junior Member
11
01-13-2020, 04:26 AM
#2
D
DylanPS4
01-13-2020, 04:26 AM #2

T
Tex0x93
Junior Member
45
01-14-2020, 06:44 PM
#3
Your processor isn’t quick enough to match the GPU’s speed, it doesn’t act out of laziness—they simply lack the capability. Improving the CPU might fix this issue. Also, what resolution is your screen? If it’s not 360Hz or higher, upgrading won’t help much and you won’t get the full benefit.
T
Tex0x93
01-14-2020, 06:44 PM #3

Your processor isn’t quick enough to match the GPU’s speed, it doesn’t act out of laziness—they simply lack the capability. Improving the CPU might fix this issue. Also, what resolution is your screen? If it’s not 360Hz or higher, upgrading won’t help much and you won’t get the full benefit.

N
Nerazzurri
Junior Member
44
01-19-2020, 11:12 AM
#4
The maximum RAM speed for this model reaches 2666 MHz.
N
Nerazzurri
01-19-2020, 11:12 AM #4

The maximum RAM speed for this model reaches 2666 MHz.

F
Foxy332
Junior Member
20
01-21-2020, 12:08 PM
#5
According to the JEDEC standard, you can achieve higher performance by using faster RAM, which is often referred to as overclocking.
F
Foxy332
01-21-2020, 12:08 PM #5

According to the JEDEC standard, you can achieve higher performance by using faster RAM, which is often referred to as overclocking.

W
Wetherbees
Junior Member
9
01-21-2020, 12:25 PM
#6
Absolutely, that's correct. RAM overclocking can be quite challenging and often relies on chance. I wouldn't claim he can achieve faster RAM speeds, but there is a chance it might work. I haven't managed any success in this area recently—my DDR4 3200 with the 12400 chip isn't even able to reach 3333MHz.
W
Wetherbees
01-21-2020, 12:25 PM #6

Absolutely, that's correct. RAM overclocking can be quite challenging and often relies on chance. I wouldn't claim he can achieve faster RAM speeds, but there is a chance it might work. I haven't managed any success in this area recently—my DDR4 3200 with the 12400 chip isn't even able to reach 3333MHz.

U
Unmute_
Junior Member
39
01-21-2020, 02:10 PM
#7
This claim has been disproven long ago. Imagine a monitor running at 120 hertz and shooting 240 frames per second; halfway through rendering the first image, it displays the next one. This might lead to tearing, yet it also provides marginally better data. A 240 hertz rate would definitely be preferable, though it still offers a noticeable upgrade in performance.
U
Unmute_
01-21-2020, 02:10 PM #7

This claim has been disproven long ago. Imagine a monitor running at 120 hertz and shooting 240 frames per second; halfway through rendering the first image, it displays the next one. This might lead to tearing, yet it also provides marginally better data. A 240 hertz rate would definitely be preferable, though it still offers a noticeable upgrade in performance.

R
Rounyx
Posting Freak
838
01-24-2020, 10:16 AM
#8
there another guy that tested reaction time him vs a pro and the pro was faster but only to a serten point. cant remember the details and its a small sample size but like anything depends on the person. 1msec response is doable with human's all the time. i think pros is about 110ms
R
Rounyx
01-24-2020, 10:16 AM #8

there another guy that tested reaction time him vs a pro and the pro was faster but only to a serten point. cant remember the details and its a small sample size but like anything depends on the person. 1msec response is doable with human's all the time. i think pros is about 110ms

_
_StankoYT_
Junior Member
33
01-24-2020, 03:13 PM
#9
My monitor uses a TN panel at 240Hz. Increasing the frame rate helps games like S1mple, niko, and these players with FPS_max set to 0. A higher FPS can lower lag. Last night I raised the CPU voltage by 0.1 and boosted the video card frequency by 100Mhz. Still no improvement. If boosting FPS isn't possible, I plan to upgrade my CPU and RAM next Christmas.
_
_StankoYT_
01-24-2020, 03:13 PM #9

My monitor uses a TN panel at 240Hz. Increasing the frame rate helps games like S1mple, niko, and these players with FPS_max set to 0. A higher FPS can lower lag. Last night I raised the CPU voltage by 0.1 and boosted the video card frequency by 100Mhz. Still no improvement. If boosting FPS isn't possible, I plan to upgrade my CPU and RAM next Christmas.

P
PvpMaster1234
Junior Member
5
01-24-2020, 03:46 PM
#10
P
PvpMaster1234
01-24-2020, 03:46 PM #10

Pages (2): 1 2 Next