F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop older intel processors vs older amd processors

older intel processors vs older amd processors

older intel processors vs older amd processors

Z
Zemboyy
Member
235
07-30-2018, 09:34 PM
#1
When considering older processors, it's important to compare performance and relevance. AMD was ahead of Intel at one point, but Intel had been dominating the market. For an older processor from either company, you'd need to evaluate whether the newer models still offer meaningful advantages. The FX8350 and i7 2600 are just examples—actual competition depends on your specific needs.
Z
Zemboyy
07-30-2018, 09:34 PM #1

When considering older processors, it's important to compare performance and relevance. AMD was ahead of Intel at one point, but Intel had been dominating the market. For an older processor from either company, you'd need to evaluate whether the newer models still offer meaningful advantages. The FX8350 and i7 2600 are just examples—actual competition depends on your specific needs.

Q
qFame
Member
197
07-30-2018, 10:11 PM
#2
2600k excels in gaming, particularly with single or dual-core tasks on the AGE. Locked 2600 nonK performs well across 3.4Ghz to 3.6Ghz allcore and 3.7-3.8Ghz single/dual core turbo settings. It's hard to say for sure now, but back then AMD had lower IPC and fewer cores/threads compared to Intel. Newer titles might still run smoothly at 4 threads, but if they're 8-core aware, Intel could have better performance since AMD can distribute workloads more efficiently. Each game behaves similarly, whether it's today or then. ARMA3 is a case of single-core gaming where AMD chips struggle against second-gen Intel at decent speeds.
Q
qFame
07-30-2018, 10:11 PM #2

2600k excels in gaming, particularly with single or dual-core tasks on the AGE. Locked 2600 nonK performs well across 3.4Ghz to 3.6Ghz allcore and 3.7-3.8Ghz single/dual core turbo settings. It's hard to say for sure now, but back then AMD had lower IPC and fewer cores/threads compared to Intel. Newer titles might still run smoothly at 4 threads, but if they're 8-core aware, Intel could have better performance since AMD can distribute workloads more efficiently. Each game behaves similarly, whether it's today or then. ARMA3 is a case of single-core gaming where AMD chips struggle against second-gen Intel at decent speeds.

C
147
07-31-2018, 11:12 AM
#3
It seems the component operates at excessively high temperatures that regular people can't manage, and historically, older AMD parts struggle against newer Intel designs. Only with the introduction of Ryzen did AMD become a more competitive choice in many situations.
C
CadentAlphadog
07-31-2018, 11:12 AM #3

It seems the component operates at excessively high temperatures that regular people can't manage, and historically, older AMD parts struggle against newer Intel designs. Only with the introduction of Ryzen did AMD become a more competitive choice in many situations.

A
AvienceYT
Member
64
08-01-2018, 11:07 PM
#4
Consider Ryzen options alongside affordable B350 or B450 boards. Look for a budget-friendly Ryzen 5 1400 or similar. Better selections are needed on a tight budget.
A
AvienceYT
08-01-2018, 11:07 PM #4

Consider Ryzen options alongside affordable B350 or B450 boards. Look for a budget-friendly Ryzen 5 1400 or similar. Better selections are needed on a tight budget.

S
sassygirl149
Junior Member
2
08-05-2018, 12:48 PM
#5
During the AMD Athlon 64 vs Intel Pentium era (around 2005), AMD performed better. In the AMD Phenom II versus Intel first-gen Core chips like the i7-960 (around 2010), results were roughly balanced. By 2011, Intel introduced its second-gen Core (i7-2600), marking a major improvement, and AMD followed up a year later with the FX series, which actually lagged behind their earlier Phenom models from a few years prior. The 2nd Gen FX chips in 2013 (such as the FX-8350) showed slight gains but remained considerably behind Intel in gaming scenarios. This trend persisted until 2017 when AMD regained competitiveness with Ryzen. Generally, the period when AMD processors outperformed Intel of the same generation was about a decade earlier. Any Intel i5/i7 from the 2xxx to 5xxx lines clearly surpassed AMD’s contemporaries.
S
sassygirl149
08-05-2018, 12:48 PM #5

During the AMD Athlon 64 vs Intel Pentium era (around 2005), AMD performed better. In the AMD Phenom II versus Intel first-gen Core chips like the i7-960 (around 2010), results were roughly balanced. By 2011, Intel introduced its second-gen Core (i7-2600), marking a major improvement, and AMD followed up a year later with the FX series, which actually lagged behind their earlier Phenom models from a few years prior. The 2nd Gen FX chips in 2013 (such as the FX-8350) showed slight gains but remained considerably behind Intel in gaming scenarios. This trend persisted until 2017 when AMD regained competitiveness with Ryzen. Generally, the period when AMD processors outperformed Intel of the same generation was about a decade earlier. Any Intel i5/i7 from the 2xxx to 5xxx lines clearly surpassed AMD’s contemporaries.