F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking OC'ING Q9650 On G41C-VS

OC'ING Q9650 On G41C-VS

OC'ING Q9650 On G41C-VS

L
Llyodsk
Member
164
11-05-2016, 03:37 PM
#1
HI GUYS:
Guys im trying to OC my Processor but unluckily after going beyond 361 FSB the pc screen wont turn on (wont boot) every thing running lights-fans-ps but with a black screen then i have to remove the battery and the same story again
i heard about Vcore oc but no option as that in bios
*after market cooler is being used
*Temps are very normal when gaming
my specs:
600W Huntkey PSU
Q9650 running at 3.3 (361 FSB)
8GB Kingston DDR3
GTX 560 TI 2GB 256-bit
1Tera WD HDD
2Tera Samsung HDD
L
Llyodsk
11-05-2016, 03:37 PM #1

HI GUYS:
Guys im trying to OC my Processor but unluckily after going beyond 361 FSB the pc screen wont turn on (wont boot) every thing running lights-fans-ps but with a black screen then i have to remove the battery and the same story again
i heard about Vcore oc but no option as that in bios
*after market cooler is being used
*Temps are very normal when gaming
my specs:
600W Huntkey PSU
Q9650 running at 3.3 (361 FSB)
8GB Kingston DDR3
GTX 560 TI 2GB 256-bit
1Tera WD HDD
2Tera Samsung HDD

D
DePOnie
Junior Member
34
11-10-2016, 02:35 AM
#2
Increasing the front side bus enhances all connected components. Not every part can be reliably clocked beyond its specifications. This is particularly relevant for budget motherboards. If stability at 361MHz isn't maintained at 362MHz, you've reached the system's highest overclock limit. Overclocking comes with no assurances.
D
DePOnie
11-10-2016, 02:35 AM #2

Increasing the front side bus enhances all connected components. Not every part can be reliably clocked beyond its specifications. This is particularly relevant for budget motherboards. If stability at 361MHz isn't maintained at 362MHz, you've reached the system's highest overclock limit. Overclocking comes with no assurances.

C
Chuck978
Member
110
11-10-2016, 03:59 AM
#3
Did you reset your CMOS? After restoring the system, a value below 361 on FSB will likely be your highest overclock unless you adjust your vcore. If you do, begin with 1.3v.
C
Chuck978
11-10-2016, 03:59 AM #3

Did you reset your CMOS? After restoring the system, a value below 361 on FSB will likely be your highest overclock unless you adjust your vcore. If you do, begin with 1.3v.

P
Petzku1618
Member
181
11-10-2016, 06:25 AM
#4
Did you reset your CMOS? After restoring your system, a value under 361 on FSB will likely be your new top overclock unless you adjust your vcore. If you do, begin with 1.3v. After removing the battery and waiting, it seems the CMOS cleared itself but then returned to its default settings, not reaching even 361 or 333.
P
Petzku1618
11-10-2016, 06:25 AM #4

Did you reset your CMOS? After restoring your system, a value under 361 on FSB will likely be your new top overclock unless you adjust your vcore. If you do, begin with 1.3v. After removing the battery and waiting, it seems the CMOS cleared itself but then returned to its default settings, not reaching even 361 or 333.

Y
74
11-11-2016, 12:54 PM
#5
Today_Abuturk :
Did you reset your CMOS?
After restoring your system, a value below 361 on FSB will likely be your new top overclock unless you adjust your vcore. If you do, begin with 1.3v.
After not starting and removing the battery, I believe the CMOS cleared itself but then returned to its default state, dropping back to around 361 or lower.
I haven’t heard of an automatic battery-based CMOS reset. Even at the stock level of 333, the machine isn’t booting up?
Y
YouShouldWorry
11-11-2016, 12:54 PM #5

Today_Abuturk :
Did you reset your CMOS?
After restoring your system, a value below 361 on FSB will likely be your new top overclock unless you adjust your vcore. If you do, begin with 1.3v.
After not starting and removing the battery, I believe the CMOS cleared itself but then returned to its default state, dropping back to around 361 or lower.
I haven’t heard of an automatic battery-based CMOS reset. Even at the stock level of 333, the machine isn’t booting up?

W
Wasp_Eater
Junior Member
40
11-22-2016, 10:27 PM
#6
TechInAZ :
Oday_Abuturk :
Did you reset your CMOS?
After restoring your system, a value under 361 on FSB will likely be your highest overclock unless you manage to increase the vcore. If you do, begin with 1.3v.
After not being able to boot and removing the battery, I believe the CMOS cleared itself but then returned to its default state, dropping back to around 361 or even lower.
I’m unfamiliar with automatically pulling the battery to reset CMOS.
Even at the stock level of 333, the machine doesn’t start?
No wonder I’m confused—I meant my PC won’t boot at 361 only, except for example, it boots normally at 361 but fails at 362. Everything else works, but the monitor stays black as if powered off, and no beeps are heard.
My aim is to exceed 361.
Appreciate your attention.
W
Wasp_Eater
11-22-2016, 10:27 PM #6

TechInAZ :
Oday_Abuturk :
Did you reset your CMOS?
After restoring your system, a value under 361 on FSB will likely be your highest overclock unless you manage to increase the vcore. If you do, begin with 1.3v.
After not being able to boot and removing the battery, I believe the CMOS cleared itself but then returned to its default state, dropping back to around 361 or even lower.
I’m unfamiliar with automatically pulling the battery to reset CMOS.
Even at the stock level of 333, the machine doesn’t start?
No wonder I’m confused—I meant my PC won’t boot at 361 only, except for example, it boots normally at 361 but fails at 362. Everything else works, but the monitor stays black as if powered off, and no beeps are heard.
My aim is to exceed 361.
Appreciate your attention.

D
Danskr
Junior Member
29
11-22-2016, 11:48 PM
#7
I think this goes beyond what I've learned about traditional overclocking. I'll pass on the details to a few more skilled folks in our group who might be able to assist.
D
Danskr
11-22-2016, 11:48 PM #7

I think this goes beyond what I've learned about traditional overclocking. I'll pass on the details to a few more skilled folks in our group who might be able to assist.

H
HeadshotGames
Member
198
11-25-2016, 01:45 PM
#8
Increasing the front side bus enhances all connected components. Not every part can be reliably clocked beyond its specifications. This is particularly relevant for budget motherboards. If stability at 361MHz isn't maintained at 362MHz, you've reached the system's highest overclock limit. Overclocking carries no assurances.
H
HeadshotGames
11-25-2016, 01:45 PM #8

Increasing the front side bus enhances all connected components. Not every part can be reliably clocked beyond its specifications. This is particularly relevant for budget motherboards. If stability at 361MHz isn't maintained at 362MHz, you've reached the system's highest overclock limit. Overclocking carries no assurances.

M
Martienez123
Member
52
11-25-2016, 05:03 PM
#9
When you increase the front side bus speed, you enhance everything connected to it. Not all components can be successfully clocked beyond their intended limits. This is particularly relevant for budget motherboards. If the system remains stable at 361MHz but not at 362MHz, you’ve reached the overclock limit for that specific setup. Overclocking comes with no assurances.
M
Martienez123
11-25-2016, 05:03 PM #9

When you increase the front side bus speed, you enhance everything connected to it. Not all components can be successfully clocked beyond their intended limits. This is particularly relevant for budget motherboards. If the system remains stable at 361MHz but not at 362MHz, you’ve reached the overclock limit for that specific setup. Overclocking comes with no assurances.

M
MMonCZE
Junior Member
37
11-28-2016, 02:28 AM
#10
Thanks for your interest, guys. I'll be at 361 until I receive an OC Mobo.
M
MMonCZE
11-28-2016, 02:28 AM #10

Thanks for your interest, guys. I'll be at 361 until I receive an OC Mobo.