NVIDIA investigates further with driver 347.29 for GTX900M series, removing overclocking capability

F5F Stay Refreshed Software Operating Systems NVIDIA investigates further with driver 347.29 for GTX900M series, removing overclocking capability

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3 Next

crazyant
Member

165

02-06-2016, 04:45 PM

#11

I'm feeling quite let down with Nvidia's 900 series. Maybe I'll opt for the 3,780Tis instead of the 3,970.

crazyant

02-06-2016, 04:45 PM #11

I'm feeling quite let down with Nvidia's 900 series. Maybe I'll opt for the 3,780Tis instead of the 3,970.

Galaxtico99
Junior Member

02-07-2016, 12:42 AM

#12

A further reason to dislike Nvidia is their MOVE ALONG approach.

Galaxtico99

02-07-2016, 12:42 AM #12

A further reason to dislike Nvidia is their MOVE ALONG approach.

Way2Meke
Member

235

02-11-2016, 07:46 PM

#13

This seems confusing, many people argue the 970 should have 4GB of VRAM but it only has 3.5GB instead, so they opt for GPUs with 3GB. It’s unrelated to the 970 specs.

Way2Meke

02-11-2016, 07:46 PM #13

This seems confusing, many people argue the 970 should have 4GB of VRAM but it only has 3.5GB instead, so they opt for GPUs with 3GB. It’s unrelated to the 970 specs.

azriT10
Junior Member

02-28-2016, 07:17 AM

#14

Wait for 390X.

azriT10

02-28-2016, 07:17 AM #14

Wait for 390X.

Abanoub
Junior Member

03-19-2016, 01:58 PM

#15

6GB STRiX 780(Ti)s are available at a lower price compared to the 3GB model in my store.

Abanoub

03-19-2016, 01:58 PM #15

6GB STRiX 780(Ti)s are available at a lower price compared to the 3GB model in my store.

mcDavoz
Senior Member

544

03-19-2016, 10:41 PM

#16

You've only managed to overclock a laptop GPU a few times, mostly on rare chances. Most average laptops lack the cooling power to handle an overclocked chip, and they really struggle with stock chips.

mcDavoz

03-19-2016, 10:41 PM #16

JonaxWTF
Member

221

03-21-2016, 05:12 AM

#17

I’m not planning to buy AMD. I’ve tested a lot of cards—7970, 7950, 270,265,285, even the 4870X2. If they didn’t fail, they’d overheat, drivers would crash, and so on.

JonaxWTF

03-21-2016, 05:12 AM #17

I’m not planning to buy AMD. I’ve tested a lot of cards—7970, 7950, 270,265,285, even the 4870X2. If they didn’t fail, they’d overheat, drivers would crash, and so on.

realfuzzpikchu
Member

208

03-21-2016, 11:11 AM

#18

It's not about that; it's Nvidia repeatedly limiting their offerings. Why shouldn't we have the freedom to push our laptops to higher speeds?

realfuzzpikchu

03-21-2016, 11:11 AM #18

It's not about that; it's Nvidia repeatedly limiting their offerings. Why shouldn't we have the freedom to push our laptops to higher speeds?

ChibiWolf39
Senior Member

491

03-27-2016, 08:31 PM

#19

You chose stock cards since aftermarket AMD ones don't overheat. Stock cards are worse.

ChibiWolf39

03-27-2016, 08:31 PM #19

You chose stock cards since aftermarket AMD ones don't overheat. Stock cards are worse.

RedKickify
Member

225

03-28-2016, 04:41 AM

#20

I think you're right about more than just Nvidia's choice—it might be another big brand that doesn't care about the damage they cause to high-end gear.

RedKickify

03-28-2016, 04:41 AM #20

I think you're right about more than just Nvidia's choice—it might be another big brand that doesn't care about the damage they cause to high-end gear.

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3 Next