Normal cpu temps?
Normal cpu temps?
Hello, your question about core temperature and pressure variation is understandable. Could you share more details about the image or symptoms you're experiencing?
Bench your CPU, e.g Cinebench and look what CPU temps you get under load. Since under load temps matter.
But what you showed us, are idle temps.
There is no ideal/normal idle temp. Since idle temp vastly differs by ambient temp, cooling solution, fan RPM, fan size and fan amount. (Dust too.)
Hence why, there are no idle temp charts in component reviews. Only under load ones.
E.g R7 9800X3D review temp chart:
https://www.techpowerup.com/review/amd-r...3d/25.html
Note: You will never get lower temps than ambient temps. Since PCs are cooled by ambient air.
Also, idle temps
doesn't matter
because even the smallest cooler can keep CPU/GPU near ambient temps. What matters, is under load temps, since there you can see the effectiveness of your cooling solution (usually balance between noise and temperature target).
E.g here's my Aurora build (full specs with pics in my sig), idle temps with the same CPU as you have:
But these values of mine will tell you 0, since you do not have the same ambient, components and airflow setup as i have.
Hey, I just did a Cinebench r23 run and these are my temps. Max temps are from cinebench r23 run.
https://imgur.com/a/YVxTbj1
Use HWinfo for detailed insights. Temperatures can reach up to 89°C yet remain within specifications.
Download the free HWiNFO software – installer and portable versions available for Windows (32/64-bit) and DOS.
Visit www.hwinfo.com for more information.
Under load temps look fine to me. Temps are even a bit better than in the review (82C vs 86C). So, you're safe with proper CPU cooling.
Tjmax for the R7 9800X3D is 95C. So, as long as you won't see 90C+ out of your chip under load, there is no need to worry.
Telemetry wise, HWinfo64 is better than HWmonitor, since former shows far more data and more accurately as well (just look the pic i shared).