No, they are correct names for those processors.
No, they are correct names for those processors.
9600X already delivers 88W under PPT, which matches the standard for CPUs with a 65W TDP. I didn’t mention earlier that PCWorld released a video explaining why they haven’t published a review yet—they felt their findings were lower than what AMD recommends. The video is quite long and covers their data thoroughly, but by the end I lost interest, so I’m unsure if they reached any final conclusions. I haven’t compared their numbers to other reviews to assess accuracy. There could be room for slightly improved performance if they adjust their approach.
Yeah apologies got those foggy acronyms mixed up, meant TDP, so PPT at 110W for 9600X, 140-150W for 9700X Think that's what DerBauer used on his 9700X (or maybe 160W ?)