No, there is no way to truly disable a defender.
No, there is no way to truly disable a defender.
The karen is back at Gat Pelsinger, heed this advice if you want your mind sharp. By the way, I still don’t suggest skipping antivirus protection. Social engineering and phishing remain relevant. If you strongly dislike Windefender, consider using ClamAV—it’s not perfect but it’s lightweight and works on Linux too. Our role is to guide and offer solutions. You can’t determine if the person is capable of acting as they wish.
This isn't sound advice, and I don't fully share your view. Running without antivirus is risky, but you shouldn't be the one to judge their choices. It's similar to suggesting someone use a saw without gloves—just an exaggerated comparison. You're also taking it personally that OP doesn't want to run another AV, even if another engine would handle it better. Many actions are discouraged yet people still try anyway. Moving forward, let OP and pelslinger experience the consequences if they skip updating AV after disabling MS Defender. Regarding a "reason to care," that's not necessary here.
Also, having an agenda with you isn't helpful—your tone seems confrontational, which wastes my time and energy.
You definitely have a point here. It’s clear you’re standing your ground, even though it seems like others share your view. Thanks for explaining. It’s interesting how I can express my own thoughts without feeling the need to judge others’ choices.
You’re not understanding, are you? If the OP is willing to act despite risks, they should be allowed to proceed with a warning. Who decides what’s safe or not? And why am I supposed to judge their choices? Please clarify your thoughts—this isn’t about me, it’s about clarity.