F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop No, processors aren't necessarily getting faster; advancements are often incremental.

No, processors aren't necessarily getting faster; advancements are often incremental.

No, processors aren't necessarily getting faster; advancements are often incremental.

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3 Next
S
SniFeFamous
Member
86
03-11-2016, 03:39 AM
#11
PC excitement resembles being a teen who admires ultra-thin celebrities, constantly striving for the highest level to meet your personal ideals.
S
SniFeFamous
03-11-2016, 03:39 AM #11

PC excitement resembles being a teen who admires ultra-thin celebrities, constantly striving for the highest level to meet your personal ideals.

2
20pega
Member
218
03-11-2016, 03:39 AM
#12
It's unclear why a 10,400 is considered better when the CPUs don't appear significantly faster.
2
20pega
03-11-2016, 03:39 AM #12

It's unclear why a 10,400 is considered better when the CPUs don't appear significantly faster.

D
debilo
Member
52
03-11-2016, 03:40 AM
#13
Every system eventually faces limitations, in some form. If you're using an older CPU paired with a newer mid-range graphics card, you might be able to work around the issue. However, if your CPU is very old and you're upgrading to a top-of-the-line GPU, it's probably time to replace the CPU. In reality, a solid build can handle adjustments, as Haraikomono mentioned—just minor tweaks make a difference.
D
debilo
03-11-2016, 03:40 AM #13

Every system eventually faces limitations, in some form. If you're using an older CPU paired with a newer mid-range graphics card, you might be able to work around the issue. However, if your CPU is very old and you're upgrading to a top-of-the-line GPU, it's probably time to replace the CPU. In reality, a solid build can handle adjustments, as Haraikomono mentioned—just minor tweaks make a difference.

X
226
03-11-2016, 03:40 AM
#14
This value is the baseline for 3080 as understood.
X
X_Impossible_X
03-11-2016, 03:40 AM #14

This value is the baseline for 3080 as understood.

C
Cysero
Junior Member
32
03-11-2016, 03:40 AM
#15
That's the way I'm approaching it.
C
Cysero
03-11-2016, 03:40 AM #15

That's the way I'm approaching it.

F
frog76
Member
177
03-11-2016, 03:40 AM
#16
Also consider what makes a significant slowdown. A noticeable 10–15 fps reduction isn’t a big issue.
F
frog76
03-11-2016, 03:40 AM #16

Also consider what makes a significant slowdown. A noticeable 10–15 fps reduction isn’t a big issue.

P
pidies
Member
151
03-11-2016, 03:40 AM
#17
you seem fine with the i5 8400, though it might slow down performance in competitive gaming
P
pidies
03-11-2016, 03:40 AM #17

you seem fine with the i5 8400, though it might slow down performance in competitive gaming

L
Lukee13
Junior Member
21
03-11-2016, 03:40 AM
#18
Thank you!
L
Lukee13
03-11-2016, 03:40 AM #18

Thank you!

I
IIAnthonyII
Member
54
03-11-2016, 03:40 AM
#19
Here things become complicated. "Faster" can mean different things—clock speed, cores, IPC, stability, memory controller performance. Many factors play a role, but what really counts is your specific needs. If you play games and want the best GPU, you might need a more powerful CPU to unlock the full potential of that high-end graphics card. However, with an 8400 and a 3060, you probably won’t notice much improvement over newer models. In theory it looks different, but in practice the gaming experience won’t change much.
I
IIAnthonyII
03-11-2016, 03:40 AM #19

Here things become complicated. "Faster" can mean different things—clock speed, cores, IPC, stability, memory controller performance. Many factors play a role, but what really counts is your specific needs. If you play games and want the best GPU, you might need a more powerful CPU to unlock the full potential of that high-end graphics card. However, with an 8400 and a 3060, you probably won’t notice much improvement over newer models. In theory it looks different, but in practice the gaming experience won’t change much.

C
Camsell
Member
207
03-11-2016, 03:40 AM
#20
Thank you for your message.
C
Camsell
03-11-2016, 03:40 AM #20

Thank you for your message.

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3 Next