No performance enhancement observed for RX6600 at 3.00GHz.

F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking No performance enhancement observed for RX6600 at 3.00GHz.

JuzzdPlay
Junior Member

10-24-2016, 08:52 PM

Hi, I see the issue. CPUz shows your Q6600 at 3.00GHz, but when you run cinebench it doesn't improve performance, staying around 240 cb or lower. The same happens with superpi, taking about 21 seconds. What's going on?

JuzzdPlay

10-24-2016, 08:52 PM #1

littleJ394
Junior Member

11-01-2016, 06:13 AM

A quad-core processor doesn't offer advantages over a dual-core one in single-threaded tests. Focus on multi-threaded Cinebench comparisons for accurate insights.

littleJ394

11-01-2016, 06:13 AM #2

A quad-core processor doesn't offer advantages over a dual-core one in single-threaded tests. Focus on multi-threaded Cinebench comparisons for accurate insights.

xBohmaNx
Member

123

11-01-2016, 08:11 AM

InvalidError :
A quad-core processor won't offer any advantages over a dual-core one during single-threaded tests. The comparison should focus on multi-threaded Cinebench outcomes. I mean, identical results come from the same chip at a faster clock speed, so you're not testing different processors.

xBohmaNx

11-01-2016, 08:11 AM #3

AAARene
Junior Member

11-01-2016, 09:21 AM

It seems the main factor is likely related to the instruction sets the CPU can handle rather than just the clock speed it can reach.

AAARene

11-01-2016, 09:21 AM #4

It seems the main factor is likely related to the instruction sets the CPU can handle rather than just the clock speed it can reach.

AllForAndroid
Junior Member

11-01-2016, 04:46 PM

Verify if the clock frequencies in your before and after states differ during each test. Ensure the CPU isn't receiving identical clock signals in both runs.

AllForAndroid

11-01-2016, 04:46 PM #5

Verify if the clock frequencies in your before and after states differ during each test. Ensure the CPU isn't receiving identical clock signals in both runs.