F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Networks No one is currently evaluating or measuring switch performance.

No one is currently evaluating or measuring switch performance.

No one is currently evaluating or measuring switch performance.

X
Xanturvan
Member
161
07-28-2016, 02:57 PM
#1
I found myself in a curious scenario today. Earlier this week, I was setting up a new server for a live stream, requiring an Ethernet port close to my streaming device. I rummaged through my old hardware collection and found a TP Link TL-SG1005D that had served me well between my home server and desktop when splitting the connection at my workstation. I connected it and everything worked fine online. Now, while browsing on that same desktop, I noticed slower performance from Steam and strange page loads. After checking a few pings, I realized packets were dropping. Definitely this isn’t my ISP—it’s happening inside the network! I double-checked that the server migration was still active over the direct wired cable, without putting extra strain on my Meraki 8-P switch. Then it struck me: the TP-Link unit was still part of the mix. Removing it improved internal pings from 6-7ms to under 1ms at the router. That’s a huge improvement. I’d been using this particular switch, assuming anything labeled Gigabit wouldn’t be too fast for my needs, but it seems budget gear can really affect performance. This made me wonder—where else are people choosing cheaper networking equipment without realizing the consequences?
X
Xanturvan
07-28-2016, 02:57 PM #1

I found myself in a curious scenario today. Earlier this week, I was setting up a new server for a live stream, requiring an Ethernet port close to my streaming device. I rummaged through my old hardware collection and found a TP Link TL-SG1005D that had served me well between my home server and desktop when splitting the connection at my workstation. I connected it and everything worked fine online. Now, while browsing on that same desktop, I noticed slower performance from Steam and strange page loads. After checking a few pings, I realized packets were dropping. Definitely this isn’t my ISP—it’s happening inside the network! I double-checked that the server migration was still active over the direct wired cable, without putting extra strain on my Meraki 8-P switch. Then it struck me: the TP-Link unit was still part of the mix. Removing it improved internal pings from 6-7ms to under 1ms at the router. That’s a huge improvement. I’d been using this particular switch, assuming anything labeled Gigabit wouldn’t be too fast for my needs, but it seems budget gear can really affect performance. This made me wonder—where else are people choosing cheaper networking equipment without realizing the consequences?

D
dgdf44
Member
112
07-28-2016, 06:25 PM
#2
SmallNetBuilder previously conducted extensive reviews in your area of interest. They may lack updates on the newest releases, but they can help confirm that products aren’t overly flawed and aren’t just the latest models. If you're just verifying quality before purchasing, it offers a solid sense of who assembles reliable kits. Edit: Servethehome is also worth exploring for additional insights.
D
dgdf44
07-28-2016, 06:25 PM #2

SmallNetBuilder previously conducted extensive reviews in your area of interest. They may lack updates on the newest releases, but they can help confirm that products aren’t overly flawed and aren’t just the latest models. If you're just verifying quality before purchasing, it offers a solid sense of who assembles reliable kits. Edit: Servethehome is also worth exploring for additional insights.

Y
YOLOGAMER109
Member
229
08-15-2016, 04:09 PM
#3
Even inexpensive devices meant for simple web use or file transfer perform adequately at their intended speed. There’s little need to compare them extensively here. Now there are methods and motivations to evaluate switches for tasks like load testing, routing capability (especially for partial layer 3 devices), and various security checks. However, for most users, the problem is unlikely to stem from how the switch is built, but possibly from a hardware issue such as a faulty cable, malfunctioning interface, or similar.
Y
YOLOGAMER109
08-15-2016, 04:09 PM #3

Even inexpensive devices meant for simple web use or file transfer perform adequately at their intended speed. There’s little need to compare them extensively here. Now there are methods and motivations to evaluate switches for tasks like load testing, routing capability (especially for partial layer 3 devices), and various security checks. However, for most users, the problem is unlikely to stem from how the switch is built, but possibly from a hardware issue such as a faulty cable, malfunctioning interface, or similar.

A
Ambiiguous
Junior Member
15
08-19-2016, 08:32 AM
#4
It's not necessarily true that every port connected to a gigabit switch is part of it.
A
Ambiiguous
08-19-2016, 08:32 AM #4

It's not necessarily true that every port connected to a gigabit switch is part of it.