No, it's not a bad idea.
No, it's not a bad idea.
Imagine the web as a building with its own layout. Each connection has its own address within that structure.
The difference lies in understanding whether it's about digital equivalency versus direct address retrieval. What was proposed was the first option, which is accurate. I believe you're referring to the second case, which isn't correct, but it wasn't intended.
i thought he was saying it like an apartment building where networking displays your unit number and location. maybe he forgot the point because it’s both odd and not very helpful. a phone number would be a better comparison, plus dynamic IPs have more problems.
The only way I understand the phone number comparison is if you provide the complete number as an IP address plus port, while a simple number without an area code resembles just an IP address. The issue I face is that most individuals are used to full phone numbers. I don’t believe removing the area code is common unless you’re far from populated areas and expecting outside contact. People usually only encounter street-level details occasionally, like apartment or suite numbers. That’s why I think this analogy fits better when discussing revealing your public IP address. Still, I acknowledge the gap between the comparison and reality was abrupt in my post.
A DMZ serves as a safe zone where servers can be accessible online while keeping the rest of your network isolated.
In a real DMZ setup, assign all spare ports to incoming traffic 