F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Networks Nighthawk X6 Tomato firmware issues

Nighthawk X6 Tomato firmware issues

Nighthawk X6 Tomato firmware issues

C
Chill159
Junior Member
5
04-23-2016, 07:54 AM
#1
Hello everyone, I just updated the Tomato firmware on my Nighthawk X6 R8000 router. Previously, I faced problems with a certain game due to restrictions from my NAT, but Tomato resolved that. Now I’m experiencing slower speeds—only about 500 Mbps download and upload, compared to over 950 Mbps on the original Netgear setup. Is there an unlisted setting affecting this? Also, QoS is completely turned off.
C
Chill159
04-23-2016, 07:54 AM #1

Hello everyone, I just updated the Tomato firmware on my Nighthawk X6 R8000 router. Previously, I faced problems with a certain game due to restrictions from my NAT, but Tomato resolved that. Now I’m experiencing slower speeds—only about 500 Mbps download and upload, compared to over 950 Mbps on the original Netgear setup. Is there an unlisted setting affecting this? Also, QoS is completely turned off.

T
Thepiggy2005
Member
161
04-23-2016, 08:29 AM
#2
It seems there’s no restriction mentioned about the firmware, and it likely stems from an incorrect configuration during setup.
T
Thepiggy2005
04-23-2016, 08:29 AM #2

It seems there’s no restriction mentioned about the firmware, and it likely stems from an incorrect configuration during setup.

S
sydneyyyyyy
Senior Member
396
04-23-2016, 02:18 PM
#3
It seems the firmware might not be optimized for WAN to LAN data transfer, possibly due to missing or turned off hardware acceleration features in Tomato.
S
sydneyyyyyy
04-23-2016, 02:18 PM #3

It seems the firmware might not be optimized for WAN to LAN data transfer, possibly due to missing or turned off hardware acceleration features in Tomato.

H
house_owner_1
Member
204
05-01-2016, 05:37 AM
#4
It seems possible but unlikely—no one has mentioned this problem since I checked all sources. I’m unsure why such a firmware would be designed for a very high-end router without fast internet support.
H
house_owner_1
05-01-2016, 05:37 AM #4

It seems possible but unlikely—no one has mentioned this problem since I checked all sources. I’m unsure why such a firmware would be designed for a very high-end router without fast internet support.

_
_NovaZone_
Member
156
05-01-2016, 05:09 PM
#5
Only a handful of users enjoy full duplex 1G connections. It’s best to check the CPU activity on the device through SSH while you perform a speed test. Keep in mind that stricter NAT and blocking rules increase the router’s workload.
_
_NovaZone_
05-01-2016, 05:09 PM #5

Only a handful of users enjoy full duplex 1G connections. It’s best to check the CPU activity on the device through SSH while you perform a speed test. Keep in mind that stricter NAT and blocking rules increase the router’s workload.

C
charlie945
Junior Member
48
05-01-2016, 06:00 PM
#6
It's accurate, though even with only up to 500 downloads it's becoming increasingly frequent. It's not just a basic router—it's built for high-speed performance. On another note, I haven't found any workarounds yet. This weekend I'll test a different firmware, and if things go wrong, I'll revert to the outdated stock Netgear version.
C
charlie945
05-01-2016, 06:00 PM #6

It's accurate, though even with only up to 500 downloads it's becoming increasingly frequent. It's not just a basic router—it's built for high-speed performance. On another note, I haven't found any workarounds yet. This weekend I'll test a different firmware, and if things go wrong, I'll revert to the outdated stock Netgear version.

T
TwinDiamond
Member
137
05-03-2016, 12:37 PM
#7
I’d prefer to invest in something superior. While my opinion is that the routers are lacking, I’ve been treated to enterprise-level capabilities on the devices I use every day. If you need a full 1G WAN<>LAN packet filtered line rate with extensive features, consider other options.
T
TwinDiamond
05-03-2016, 12:37 PM #7

I’d prefer to invest in something superior. While my opinion is that the routers are lacking, I’ve been treated to enterprise-level capabilities on the devices I use every day. If you need a full 1G WAN<>LAN packet filtered line rate with extensive features, consider other options.