F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking New to overclocking and PC stuff and I want to overclock my FX 8320

New to overclocking and PC stuff and I want to overclock my FX 8320

New to overclocking and PC stuff and I want to overclock my FX 8320

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
X
xdpical
Junior Member
15
07-25-2016, 07:43 AM
#1
I assembled this PC three years ago and it has FX 8320 3.5ghz, crosshair formula v z (bought a cheap new one, no regrets), 8gb ram, 7790 1gb (already have my rx 480 here), and a GX II 750w psu. I was thinking about getting a master evo 212 and boosting the cpu to 4.0ghz to possibly improve the rx 480 performance. Anyone knows how much that would actually help? Also, does running at 4.0ghz with the stock voltage seem possible in most cases?
X
xdpical
07-25-2016, 07:43 AM #1

I assembled this PC three years ago and it has FX 8320 3.5ghz, crosshair formula v z (bought a cheap new one, no regrets), 8gb ram, 7790 1gb (already have my rx 480 here), and a GX II 750w psu. I was thinking about getting a master evo 212 and boosting the cpu to 4.0ghz to possibly improve the rx 480 performance. Anyone knows how much that would actually help? Also, does running at 4.0ghz with the stock voltage seem possible in most cases?

S
shark1045
Member
199
07-25-2016, 10:51 PM
#2
The 8320 handles overclocking effectively. It typically achieves 4.0 under proper cooling, which the Hyper 212 should also manage.
For guidance, I would search online for a suitable tutorial. The general approach is to boost clocks until errors appear, then adjust voltage for better stability, and continue until temperatures match your limits. If you're not comfortable changing voltages, you can usually extract a few MHz from the chip at standard voltage.
S
shark1045
07-25-2016, 10:51 PM #2

The 8320 handles overclocking effectively. It typically achieves 4.0 under proper cooling, which the Hyper 212 should also manage.
For guidance, I would search online for a suitable tutorial. The general approach is to boost clocks until errors appear, then adjust voltage for better stability, and continue until temperatures match your limits. If you're not comfortable changing voltages, you can usually extract a few MHz from the chip at standard voltage.

T
tripmeup
Junior Member
12
07-27-2016, 06:46 PM
#3
The 8320 handles overclocking effectively. It typically achieves 4.0 under proper cooling, which the Hyper 212 should also manage.
For guidance, I would search online for suitable instructions. The general approach is to raise the clocks until errors appear, then adjust the voltage for better stability, and continue until temperatures match your limits. If you prefer not to alter voltages, you can usually extract a few MHz from the chip at standard voltage.
T
tripmeup
07-27-2016, 06:46 PM #3

The 8320 handles overclocking effectively. It typically achieves 4.0 under proper cooling, which the Hyper 212 should also manage.
For guidance, I would search online for suitable instructions. The general approach is to raise the clocks until errors appear, then adjust the voltage for better stability, and continue until temperatures match your limits. If you prefer not to alter voltages, you can usually extract a few MHz from the chip at standard voltage.

E
EHB2112
Member
136
07-28-2016, 12:15 AM
#4
The 8320 performs well overclocking. It typically achieves 4.0 with sufficient cooling, which the Hyper 212 should also manage.
For guidance, I plan to search online for a suitable tutorial. The general approach is to raise clocks until errors appear, then adjust voltage for better stability, and continue until temperatures match your limits. If you prefer not to alter voltages, you can usually extract a few MHz from the chip at standard voltage.
I watched this video and thought it would be straightforward
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lC9ALZ_gm-0
E
EHB2112
07-28-2016, 12:15 AM #4

The 8320 performs well overclocking. It typically achieves 4.0 with sufficient cooling, which the Hyper 212 should also manage.
For guidance, I plan to search online for a suitable tutorial. The general approach is to raise clocks until errors appear, then adjust voltage for better stability, and continue until temperatures match your limits. If you prefer not to alter voltages, you can usually extract a few MHz from the chip at standard voltage.
I watched this video and thought it would be straightforward
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lC9ALZ_gm-0

B
bubba026
Junior Member
13
07-28-2016, 09:11 AM
#5
Sadly, I can't view videos at the moment, but the process is actually quite straightforward. Most modern motherboards have a BIOS that is nicely built to handle this easily, especially if you intend to use the original clock speeds. Some even include automatic overclocking features, though these often perform better than manual adjustments.
B
bubba026
07-28-2016, 09:11 AM #5

Sadly, I can't view videos at the moment, but the process is actually quite straightforward. Most modern motherboards have a BIOS that is nicely built to handle this easily, especially if you intend to use the original clock speeds. Some even include automatic overclocking features, though these often perform better than manual adjustments.

H
hanniie_
Junior Member
36
07-28-2016, 12:08 PM
#6
Unfortunately, I can't watch videos at the moment, but it's actually quite straightforward. Most modern motherboards have BIOS setups that make this process relatively simple, especially if you're using the original clock speeds. Some even include automatic overclocking features, though they often perform better with manual adjustments. I was thinking about using the automatic overclock feature called 'CPU level up,' but I'm not sure it's the best approach.
H
hanniie_
07-28-2016, 12:08 PM #6

Unfortunately, I can't watch videos at the moment, but it's actually quite straightforward. Most modern motherboards have BIOS setups that make this process relatively simple, especially if you're using the original clock speeds. Some even include automatic overclocking features, though they often perform better with manual adjustments. I was thinking about using the automatic overclock feature called 'CPU level up,' but I'm not sure it's the best approach.

L
226
07-31-2016, 11:39 AM
#7
They usually use more voltage than needed. It won't fry the CPU, but it leads to higher temperatures and reduced lifespan. I'd suggest checking the "CPU Multiplier" setting and seeing how far it goes. x40 should work well, and you might manage a bit more with some effort.
L
LuLuPlaysCraft
07-31-2016, 11:39 AM #7

They usually use more voltage than needed. It won't fry the CPU, but it leads to higher temperatures and reduced lifespan. I'd suggest checking the "CPU Multiplier" setting and seeing how far it goes. x40 should work well, and you might manage a bit more with some effort.

A
Agman10
Senior Member
690
08-06-2016, 05:37 PM
#8
Yes, they usually apply more voltage than needed. It’s not enough to cause a CPU crash, but it leads to higher temperatures and reduced lifespan. I’d suggest checking the "CPU Multiplier" setting and seeing how far you can go. x40 should be acceptable, and with a bit of luck you might manage to increase it slightly. As the video indicates, he disabled AMD turbo core and adjusted the CPU ratio from 17.5 to 20, which aligns with what I intended and tested.
A
Agman10
08-06-2016, 05:37 PM #8

Yes, they usually apply more voltage than needed. It’s not enough to cause a CPU crash, but it leads to higher temperatures and reduced lifespan. I’d suggest checking the "CPU Multiplier" setting and seeing how far you can go. x40 should be acceptable, and with a bit of luck you might manage to increase it slightly. As the video indicates, he disabled AMD turbo core and adjusted the CPU ratio from 17.5 to 20, which aligns with what I intended and tested.

Y
yolominer5
Member
71
08-06-2016, 11:46 PM
#9
It seems you're thinking correctly. It's advised to turn off Turbo Core, and I haven't had the opportunity to personally modify an AM3 CPU yet.
Y
yolominer5
08-06-2016, 11:46 PM #9

It seems you're thinking correctly. It's advised to turn off Turbo Core, and I haven't had the opportunity to personally modify an AM3 CPU yet.

F
Furiousflame11
Junior Member
29
08-09-2016, 12:11 PM
#10
It seems correct. I didn't have a chance to personally modify an AM3 CPU, so it's advised to turn off the Turbo Core. Thank you for your time.
F
Furiousflame11
08-09-2016, 12:11 PM #10

It seems correct. I didn't have a chance to personally modify an AM3 CPU, so it's advised to turn off the Turbo Core. Thank you for your time.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next