F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop New construction after several decades

New construction after several decades

New construction after several decades

Pages (2): Previous 1 2
J
jklim101
Member
209
06-19-2016, 01:48 PM
#11
Noted observation regarding the i5/i7 models... I recall purchasing them in 2015 when the difference between the 7 and 5 generations was quite large. Looking up now indicates the gap has significantly narrowed...
J
jklim101
06-19-2016, 01:48 PM #11

Noted observation regarding the i5/i7 models... I recall purchasing them in 2015 when the difference between the 7 and 5 generations was quite large. Looking up now indicates the gap has significantly narrowed...

J
JEFF_JEFFERSON
Senior Member
627
06-19-2016, 10:22 PM
#12
Checking B760 boards, I'm confirming the standard header needed for a Type-C front I/O.
J
JEFF_JEFFERSON
06-19-2016, 10:22 PM #12

Checking B760 boards, I'm confirming the standard header needed for a Type-C front I/O.

1
62
06-20-2016, 03:53 AM
#13
Type c would correspond to USB 3.2 generation 2 and subsequent standards.
1
1v1ClubPenquin
06-20-2016, 03:53 AM #13

Type c would correspond to USB 3.2 generation 2 and subsequent standards.

Z
ZlouKoT
Member
88
06-20-2016, 05:42 AM
#14
I strongly disagree, as the 6800XT appears to perform marginally better in general, though there are instances where the 4070 excels.
Z
ZlouKoT
06-20-2016, 05:42 AM #14

I strongly disagree, as the 6800XT appears to perform marginally better in general, though there are instances where the 4070 excels.

C
Colefusion
Senior Member
382
06-20-2016, 10:49 AM
#15
You might notice some AMD-preferred names? Check the benchmarks for both ray tracing and rasterization here: Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 Review: Mainstream Ada Arrives Comparable to the RTX 3080 for $100 less and featuring DLSS 3. RTX means frames per second at 1080p: 4070 - 112 fps 6800XT - 91 fps No RT 1080p mean: 4070 - 138 fps 6800XT - 128 fps
C
Colefusion
06-20-2016, 10:49 AM #15

You might notice some AMD-preferred names? Check the benchmarks for both ray tracing and rasterization here: Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 Review: Mainstream Ada Arrives Comparable to the RTX 3080 for $100 less and featuring DLSS 3. RTX means frames per second at 1080p: 4070 - 112 fps 6800XT - 91 fps No RT 1080p mean: 4070 - 138 fps 6800XT - 128 fps

H
HCFEotw
Member
132
06-20-2016, 04:53 PM
#16
Looking at the performance figures from Tom’s Hardware, the 6800 XT comes just a bit above the 4070. The difference isn’t huge, but since I could pick either a 4070 for $599 or a 6800 XT for $499, I went with the latter. If you’re gaming or using apps that favor RT, Nvidia is the better option… but for saving about 16-17% in cost, it’s still worth considering.
H
HCFEotw
06-20-2016, 04:53 PM #16

Looking at the performance figures from Tom’s Hardware, the 6800 XT comes just a bit above the 4070. The difference isn’t huge, but since I could pick either a 4070 for $599 or a 6800 XT for $499, I went with the latter. If you’re gaming or using apps that favor RT, Nvidia is the better option… but for saving about 16-17% in cost, it’s still worth considering.

Pages (2): Previous 1 2