F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop New 9th generation Intel chips outperform Ryzen processors in both memory and cache speed.

New 9th generation Intel chips outperform Ryzen processors in both memory and cache speed.

New 9th generation Intel chips outperform Ryzen processors in both memory and cache speed.

R
RoiMP
Member
80
03-24-2016, 02:32 AM
#1
I found the claim to be questionable. It seems to suggest a significant performance gap between 9th generation Intel processors and Ryzen CPUs in memory and cache speed. I’m not very familiar with these details, but it doesn’t align with typical benchmarks I’ve seen. For more insight, you might check recent tech reviews or performance comparisons that analyze these specific architectures.
R
RoiMP
03-24-2016, 02:32 AM #1

I found the claim to be questionable. It seems to suggest a significant performance gap between 9th generation Intel processors and Ryzen CPUs in memory and cache speed. I’m not very familiar with these details, but it doesn’t align with typical benchmarks I’ve seen. For more insight, you might check recent tech reviews or performance comparisons that analyze these specific architectures.

F
Fred10244
Posting Freak
937
03-26-2016, 01:33 AM
#2
Marketing ideas inspired by attention-grabbing phrases like “Apple Killer,” “You won’t believe what happened Next,” and the usual “You’ve been doing X wrong.”
F
Fred10244
03-26-2016, 01:33 AM #2

Marketing ideas inspired by attention-grabbing phrases like “Apple Killer,” “You won’t believe what happened Next,” and the usual “You’ve been doing X wrong.”

J
J1son
Member
211
03-31-2016, 10:30 PM
#3
Ringbus performs well with fewer CPU cores, especially on lower core counts. Performance drops as more cores are added, which is why meshbus exists. However, it tends to be slower in terms of latency. Unless your task relies mainly on memory latency, this difference usually doesn’t matter much.
J
J1son
03-31-2016, 10:30 PM #3

Ringbus performs well with fewer CPU cores, especially on lower core counts. Performance drops as more cores are added, which is why meshbus exists. However, it tends to be slower in terms of latency. Unless your task relies mainly on memory latency, this difference usually doesn’t matter much.

H
Hayden404
Member
72
04-04-2016, 04:14 AM
#4
This situation has persisted since the Ryzen 1 release.
H
Hayden404
04-04-2016, 04:14 AM #4

This situation has persisted since the Ryzen 1 release.

F
Foreverkim
Member
103
04-04-2016, 11:00 AM
#5
It depends on the situation. It's only relevant in certain contexts and can have a significant impact when those conditions are met.
F
Foreverkim
04-04-2016, 11:00 AM #5

It depends on the situation. It's only relevant in certain contexts and can have a significant impact when those conditions are met.

L
Lord_Xeen
Junior Member
44
04-11-2016, 04:09 AM
#6
Varies with the particular task and its impact on performance. Essentially, it's unusual to mention it as a negative unless the workload truly matters.
L
Lord_Xeen
04-11-2016, 04:09 AM #6

Varies with the particular task and its impact on performance. Essentially, it's unusual to mention it as a negative unless the workload truly matters.

A
Adabelle
Senior Member
724
04-11-2016, 06:27 PM
#7
Thank you for your kind words.
A
Adabelle
04-11-2016, 06:27 PM #7

Thank you for your kind words.

P
ProSkipperz
Member
129
04-13-2016, 03:03 AM
#8
It's important to recognize that games handle latency differently, and this varies from game to game. At the end of the day, you'd need to refer to performance benchmarks for each title.
P
ProSkipperz
04-13-2016, 03:03 AM #8

It's important to recognize that games handle latency differently, and this varies from game to game. At the end of the day, you'd need to refer to performance benchmarks for each title.

J
jarinos
Junior Member
43
04-23-2016, 01:37 PM
#9
Skip the vague remarks and focus on actual industry standards to determine real performance gains.
J
jarinos
04-23-2016, 01:37 PM #9

Skip the vague remarks and focus on actual industry standards to determine real performance gains.