F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Networks Netgear Rax 40 prevents site access.

Netgear Rax 40 prevents site access.

Netgear Rax 40 prevents site access.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
V
Vayneofhate79
Member
215
05-31-2021, 07:54 AM
#1
You're trying to configure a blocklist on your Rax40 router for unsafe content. The web interface supports keyword and domain blocking, but it seems to be malfunctioning. A Netgear support note mentions issues with HTTPS sites, which is unusual given the limited number of non-HTTPS sites. You're wondering if adjusting the Host file in Windows 11 could help, and whether that approach has drawbacks. There are many online guides available for copying and applying blocklists.
V
Vayneofhate79
05-31-2021, 07:54 AM #1

You're trying to configure a blocklist on your Rax40 router for unsafe content. The web interface supports keyword and domain blocking, but it seems to be malfunctioning. A Netgear support note mentions issues with HTTPS sites, which is unusual given the limited number of non-HTTPS sites. You're wondering if adjusting the Host file in Windows 11 could help, and whether that approach has drawbacks. There are many online guides available for copying and applying blocklists.

X
xXJay_BugXx
Senior Member
559
05-31-2021, 10:50 AM
#2
Check if the PC's DNS configuration is directed at the Netgear router.
X
xXJay_BugXx
05-31-2021, 10:50 AM #2

Check if the PC's DNS configuration is directed at the Netgear router.

A
206
05-31-2021, 02:44 PM
#3
Manual accepts the idea, so it seems that feature is mostly not helpful. You’ll likely need to configure a pi-hole instead.
A
Anthony69edher
05-31-2021, 02:44 PM #3

Manual accepts the idea, so it seems that feature is mostly not helpful. You’ll likely need to configure a pi-hole instead.

B
BlueStar_LH
Posting Freak
842
06-01-2021, 07:23 AM
#4
Attempted it again, but it doesn't function.
B
BlueStar_LH
06-01-2021, 07:23 AM #4

Attempted it again, but it doesn't function.

X
xXRAXERXx
Posting Freak
817
06-08-2021, 07:04 AM
#5
The most recent tech support piece on this topic dates back to 2022. Chrome began alerting users about the absence of HTTPS long before that, which seems unrealistic. It shouldn’t be so difficult to restrict access for families with less technical expertise.
X
xXRAXERXx
06-08-2021, 07:04 AM #5

The most recent tech support piece on this topic dates back to 2022. Chrome began alerting users about the absence of HTTPS long before that, which seems unrealistic. It shouldn’t be so difficult to restrict access for families with less technical expertise.

S
SillyDragon
Senior Member
586
06-08-2021, 03:48 PM
#6
It's not an issue, it's a technical limitation. HTTPS secures the page by using a unique key pair for each server and device, meaning you can't simply read the content without decrypting it first, which defeats the main reason for using HTTPS.
S
SillyDragon
06-08-2021, 03:48 PM #6

It's not an issue, it's a technical limitation. HTTPS secures the page by using a unique key pair for each server and device, meaning you can't simply read the content without decrypting it first, which defeats the main reason for using HTTPS.

H
HazzerMc
Junior Member
15
06-09-2021, 12:56 PM
#7
It's frustrating not having DNS-based blocking in place. While workarounds exist, they're not ideal. It's better than the default approach where Netgear claims most traffic is safe, but it still feels like a weak solution.
H
HazzerMc
06-09-2021, 12:56 PM #7

It's frustrating not having DNS-based blocking in place. While workarounds exist, they're not ideal. It's better than the default approach where Netgear claims most traffic is safe, but it still feels like a weak solution.

S
SackYourMom
Junior Member
5
06-11-2021, 12:49 PM
#8
It isn't required to analyze the site content; it's not a filter but a block. When you request YouTube through the router and it's instructed to block Youtube.com, it simply refuses to process the request without scanning. If changing the host is possible, that should allow modification at the router level.
S
SackYourMom
06-11-2021, 12:49 PM #8

It isn't required to analyze the site content; it's not a filter but a block. When you request YouTube through the router and it's instructed to block Youtube.com, it simply refuses to process the request without scanning. If changing the host is possible, that should allow modification at the router level.

B
BOnnibriel
Junior Member
37
06-16-2021, 10:01 PM
#9
The main concern is the absence of a relevant function, only keyword blocking exists. This means it lacks a helpful capability, though it does have an unnecessary one.
B
BOnnibriel
06-16-2021, 10:01 PM #9

The main concern is the absence of a relevant function, only keyword blocking exists. This means it lacks a helpful capability, though it does have an unnecessary one.

J
JustVanilla
Member
100
06-17-2021, 01:11 AM
#10
The specific guide for handling this on the router mentions "domain names," though for Netgear it likely received thorough development similar to a high-end vehicle.
J
JustVanilla
06-17-2021, 01:11 AM #10

The specific guide for handling this on the router mentions "domain names," though for Netgear it likely received thorough development similar to a high-end vehicle.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next