F5F Stay Refreshed Software PC Gaming Neglecting to accurately define system needs.

Neglecting to accurately define system needs.

Neglecting to accurately define system needs.

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3 Next
T
Tbnrplebs123
Member
61
01-11-2018, 11:39 PM
#11
I experimented with it on a laptop. Played a lot of Halo Combat Evolved and Painkiller.
T
Tbnrplebs123
01-11-2018, 11:39 PM #11

I experimented with it on a laptop. Played a lot of Halo Combat Evolved and Painkiller.

W
wiped_out
Member
208
01-14-2018, 09:18 AM
#12
I’ll do my best to help you understand. What do you want to learn?
W
wiped_out
01-14-2018, 09:18 AM #12

I’ll do my best to help you understand. What do you want to learn?

B
Butterfly1416
Senior Member
701
01-21-2018, 03:24 AM
#13
TES III: Morrowind was the most enjoyable game I played, but it stopped working after around 15 minutes.
B
Butterfly1416
01-21-2018, 03:24 AM #13

TES III: Morrowind was the most enjoyable game I played, but it stopped working after around 15 minutes.

B
Boxer007
Junior Member
21
01-25-2018, 02:53 AM
#14
I previously ran all my titles on a Core i3 2310M, Intel HD 3000 with 3GB RAM. I kept everything on the lowest settings—720p—and managed around 30 frames per second. There was never a game that became unplayable. These were demanding titles like Skyrim, Borderlands 2, and Bioshock Infinite.
B
Boxer007
01-25-2018, 02:53 AM #14

I previously ran all my titles on a Core i3 2310M, Intel HD 3000 with 3GB RAM. I kept everything on the lowest settings—720p—and managed around 30 frames per second. There was never a game that became unplayable. These were demanding titles like Skyrim, Borderlands 2, and Bioshock Infinite.

X
XxKripxDeMoNxX
Senior Member
536
01-29-2018, 01:05 PM
#15
The laptop has become a board fastened to my desk, hehe.
X
XxKripxDeMoNxX
01-29-2018, 01:05 PM #15

The laptop has become a board fastened to my desk, hehe.

A
aicontepig
Member
57
01-29-2018, 07:51 PM
#16
This suggestion sparked a solid plan to run Tomb Raider 2013 on my laptop. 4 frames per second should work fine.
A
aicontepig
01-29-2018, 07:51 PM #16

This suggestion sparked a solid plan to run Tomb Raider 2013 on my laptop. 4 frames per second should work fine.

B
brobear7
Posting Freak
892
01-30-2018, 11:56 PM
#17
Typically you need around 6 or 7
B
brobear7
01-30-2018, 11:56 PM #17

Typically you need around 6 or 7

F
Frinex10
Posting Freak
806
01-31-2018, 02:45 AM
#18
It's not the perfect solution, but it works for me.
F
Frinex10
01-31-2018, 02:45 AM #18

It's not the perfect solution, but it works for me.

L
legoman0222
Junior Member
9
02-07-2018, 04:10 PM
#19
Everything is personal
L
legoman0222
02-07-2018, 04:10 PM #19

Everything is personal

D
dorklad
Member
68
02-07-2018, 09:21 PM
#20
Yeah definitely i got fallout 4 running on my three year old laptop with a gt 745m graphics (which has aged rather badly due to this being my first computer and all.) fallout 4 runs smoothly at 30 fps at 1080p on low to medium settings. but GTA 5 is another story i tried, it works but is not really playable
D
dorklad
02-07-2018, 09:21 PM #20

Yeah definitely i got fallout 4 running on my three year old laptop with a gt 745m graphics (which has aged rather badly due to this being my first computer and all.) fallout 4 runs smoothly at 30 fps at 1080p on low to medium settings. but GTA 5 is another story i tried, it works but is not really playable

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3 Next