Need help choosing a Linux distribution? Here are some options to consider:
Need help choosing a Linux distribution? Here are some options to consider:
It's 2022, and I'm reflecting on my unsuccessful Linux migration effort. The distributions I tried—from Ubuntu to Arch—didn't meet the essential requirements in 2017. By then, I had already removed all patches and Windows 7 became the clear winner. If others still praise Linux, it raises questions about its suitability for my needs. It grew increasingly annoying to invest $200 just to replicate similar capabilities in Windows 7 Ultimate (the license was from back when). Even with my existing hardware, I found Windows 10 to be less efficient than even older versions like Vista. Running it under real workloads made it difficult to match the performance of an i7 6700 today. Switching to Windows 10 would have meant losing software and risking data loss, especially after testing from non-critical machines. Considering the $51,000 in student debt, spending $200 felt like a poor trade-off. Many say Linux is stable, but I've seen it break under pressure—especially when updates introduce critical failures. The real issue isn't just functionality; it's reliability and long-term support. I'm now seeking a distro that can handle the demanding roles my system faces, including heavy gaming, CAD work, video editing, and peer-to-peer data sharing. Powerful hardware is essential for such a setup, especially with an RX 6900XT handling non-gaming tasks. If replacement software costs over $250, the project would likely fail before it begins. Continuous updates from Microsoft, particularly the shift to 64-bit, have made Windows increasingly risky. The CPU would need future upgrades to keep up with all demands. Right now, my main priorities are:
- All storage ports support up to 12 TB
- Powerful components needed for demanding tasks like game dev and CAD
- Software compatibility across multiple roles
- Reliable backup and recovery options
- Stable performance without frequent crashes or data loss
Windows still feels unstable compared to what people claim, especially when compared to the more dependable Pro version versus the less stable Home edition. I'm determined to find a distro that can truly replace Windows 7 Ultimate in my workflow.
For non-Mac OS X or FreeBSD systems, I recommend using Ubuntu MATE LTS. It’s straightforward and reliable, letting me focus on getting my PCs functional. While I’m okay with Windows 10 once drivers are set up, I find Linux offers a more consistent experience. The issues some face often stem from design choices or the freedom to pick different desktop environments, including xkcd 927.
I notice this identical issue here. For me, Windows functions properly about 99% of the time, yet certain individuals consistently face unexpected complications with Windows that I'm unfamiliar with. It feels almost like a technological curse...
I would have retained XP and its installation disc 20 years ago, though I lacked the authority to do so. I attempted to emulate XP and 7 using sample games as my initial effort before moving to the full transition. Ubuntu might have been the plan if I remember correctly. The outcome was a clear failure—PCIe passthrough didn't function properly for testing with a dedicated GPU. It seems Linux is still a challenge in 2022 (SteamOS review in progress).
I rely on Ubuntu for daily tasks and development projects. The choice depends on your requirements—FreeCAD suits most needs, while Debian or Ubuntu offers better stability. I personally use Sweet Home 3D, which performs well. What software are you currently using?
I usually rely on MacOS for the desktop and FreeBSD for the server, that’s my usual setup. But in my opinion, Windows doesn’t have the same capabilities as Linux. The method might vary, but I’ve been using Linux since 1995 and have been doing it regularly up to around 2012. Dual-booting can be a hassle. You often find yourself stuck when you don’t know how to do something, so you restart on Windows to try the task, which stops you from mastering Linux skills or figuring out the right hardware and software. (or the way you approach it). I’m considered an advanced user, and between 1995 and 2012 I managed just fine without Windows. As for current system suggestions? That’s difficult. I spend most of my time on Unix/Linux systems and what I value most now is simplicity. I don’t want to spend all day at work on a system and then come home to tackle it all night. Therefore, MacOS appeals to me. It’s not perfect, but Apple isn’t always the most user-friendly, especially when decisions seem arbitrary. Still, it offers solid support for Unix tools and can handle advanced tasks with Homebrew or Macports. The best choice is one you use without thinking about it—like the OS that runs your car without you needing to focus on the controls. That’s what I’m after. Desktop environments should feel seamless; they shouldn’t demand constant attention. (Consider the operating system that manages your car—do you think about it or just drive? That’s my take on an ideal desktop OS.) Right now, MacOS is the closest match, it rarely disrupts unless necessary and it’s easy to overlook while working. Windows, on the other hand, tends to nag with settings, updates, and new interfaces, like a child constantly seeking your focus. At Microsoft, it seems they prioritize flashy features over fixing old issues, focusing more on what sells than what improves. As I mentioned earlier, FreeBSD is better for servers due to its simplicity, though it might feel a bit rough for modern desktops. GhostBSD could be a decent alternative for Linux. For Ubuntu, I’m a bit lazy—it has flaws but often gets the job done. Gentoo comes closest to FreeBSD. Saberon plus Easymode is a solid choice. Alpine Linux is lightweight and efficient. Deepin offers Debian with a fresh design. I wouldn’t suggest RedHat or similar, even for someone who dislikes it—they add unnecessary complexity just to keep sales up.
I'm not familiar with Linux deep. Likely only spent a few hours trying to modify things or figure out what works, since most of my background is coding for university projects on Linux machines. Most of what I've done has been researching and comparing alternatives to Art Software. It's doable to run Clip Studio Paint EX on Linux, though Krita is often suggested as a better option because it comes pre-installed.
Audio tools: There are several available, but some interfaces and plugins don't work out of the box on Linux.
3D modeling: Blender supports Linux well.
Video editing: Vegas Pro isn't present, but alternatives like Kdenlive and DaVinci Resolve function nicely.
Synchronization projects: Tixati is Linux-compatible. Git was partly built by Linus Torvalds, so it should work smoothly.
Video recording: OBS is available on Linux.
Backup & recovery: Paid Macrium versions may fit Linux; alternatives include Clonezilla and Rescuezilla.
Thrustermaster T 16000m: Official info says it's plug-and-play, but the T.A.R.G.E.T app isn't listed.
Huion drawing tablet: Some features appear to work directly, though full support may need extra drivers.
PC gaming: Recording usually works, though some games with anti-cheat systems might not run smoothly on Linux.
Multiple server hosting: Should be manageable, especially for those familiar with Linux setups.
CAD software: Limited options; consider checking Linux distributions for pre-installed packages.
For beginners, exploring sites like Distrochooser can help pick a desktop that suits your needs. What you prefer to use matters a lot at first.
Art Software: Many discuss The GIMP, which is a powerful tool capable of handling most tasks that Photoshop manages for raster images. However, it often requires significantly more effort, expertise, and time. Personally, I prefer using an iPad—it performs better in this context. While I don’t edit primarily on The GIMP, I sometimes rely on it as a dependable alternative.
Audio Workstation Software: Audacity serves as a solid editor, and Audour functions reasonably well as a digital audio workstation once you understand its quirks. Other options like Mixxx exist, but nothing matches the capabilities of Abelton Live. While I’m not trying to promote Linux, it’s clear that MacOS holds a strong position in this area. Linux excels in basic creation or highly customized environments (such as Audour), but advanced setups are more typical on MacOS.
Synchronization: Linux stands out here, with tools like rsync, Deluge, qbittorrent, and BitTorrent Sync (including Syncthing). This is where Linux truly shines.
Backups and drive tools: You won’t need extra software for managing this—Linux includes everything for various file systems, and it offers access to top-notch technology, though mastering it can still be challenging.
Servers: Linux works well, but FreeBSD’s Jail infrastructure surpasses it if you need to host many independent services on a single machine. It’s also simpler to use and maintain. (Check out Bastille manager for more info.)
@jde3 shared their thoughts on current distro suggestions. Choosing one is challenging. I spend most of my time with Unix/Linux systems and now prioritize ease of use for personal projects. I don’t want to constantly switch between work and home environments. MacOS appeals to me because it feels straightforward, even though it isn’t flawless. Apple’s decisions can be frustrating at times, but it offers solid support and lets you run Unix-like tools via Homebrew or Macports. The best system is one you don’t consciously think about while working on it—something seamless. I’ve tried many distributions over the years: from Jauntu to Debian-based, some independent ones, Puppy, Slackware, and recently PCLOS with Openbox WM. Simplicity, ease of upgrades, and a supportive community are key. PCLOS Magazine is also very helpful. It’s been 12 years since I last used any Windows variant.