F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Networks navigate the hotel captive portal to avoid restrictions

navigate the hotel captive portal to avoid restrictions

navigate the hotel captive portal to avoid restrictions

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
_
_NeoBl0X_
Senior Member
635
06-17-2016, 02:00 PM
#1
I’ll be at a hotel with a captive portal Wi-Fi. Some devices don’t connect through it, so I plan to use my laptop to bridge directly to Virtual PFISense via Ethernet. My issue is making the WAN side communicate with PFISense while using the captive portal. I’ve worked with non-captive networks before—any tips on sharing the captive portal from my laptop would help.
_
_NeoBl0X_
06-17-2016, 02:00 PM #1

I’ll be at a hotel with a captive portal Wi-Fi. Some devices don’t connect through it, so I plan to use my laptop to bridge directly to Virtual PFISense via Ethernet. My issue is making the WAN side communicate with PFISense while using the captive portal. I’ve worked with non-captive networks before—any tips on sharing the captive portal from my laptop would help.

N
nmle
Junior Member
3
06-23-2016, 09:40 AM
#2
Change the MAC address of the device you intended to register on your laptop's Wi-Fi card. Register it via the packet fence, then reset it. Your gadget will be added afterward. This method is sometimes used with Xbox consoles.
N
nmle
06-23-2016, 09:40 AM #2

Change the MAC address of the device you intended to register on your laptop's Wi-Fi card. Register it via the packet fence, then reset it. Your gadget will be added afterward. This method is sometimes used with Xbox consoles.

W
WindPat
Junior Member
12
06-23-2016, 02:06 PM
#3
Nat must connect to PFSense via one Mac or IP device. You'll access the bridge through a second device—either a laptop or PFSense itself—depending on your setup. If using internet sharing, it adds an extra native layer.
W
WindPat
06-23-2016, 02:06 PM #3

Nat must connect to PFSense via one Mac or IP device. You'll access the bridge through a second device—either a laptop or PFSense itself—depending on your setup. If using internet sharing, it adds an extra native layer.

P
PitufoGreen
Member
109
06-23-2016, 03:24 PM
#4
He didn't explain the reason for the connection issue, only mentioned "can't connect," suggesting a limit on simultaneous contacts. It's unlikely he's targeting outdated devices; if they can't connect, contacting hotel staff would be better. Avoid setting up a mini network.
P
PitufoGreen
06-23-2016, 03:24 PM #4

He didn't explain the reason for the connection issue, only mentioned "can't connect," suggesting a limit on simultaneous contacts. It's unlikely he's targeting outdated devices; if they can't connect, contacting hotel staff would be better. Avoid setting up a mini network.

M
maisymoon
Member
223
06-25-2016, 12:06 PM
#5
You seem completely unaware of how the registration process functions. Here are some devices I’m familiar with that don’t work well with many packet fence solutions I’ve tried—like the Nintendo Switch, Xbox 360 (even with edge), PSP, Vita, and any system running an outdated web browser that lets the packet fence read MAC addresses. This includes older devices and IoT gadgets, since all their traffic still passes through the hotel network using a MAC address (or several) linked to their name. <removed> Updated July 6, 2018 by SansVarnic
M
maisymoon
06-25-2016, 12:06 PM #5

You seem completely unaware of how the registration process functions. Here are some devices I’m familiar with that don’t work well with many packet fence solutions I’ve tried—like the Nintendo Switch, Xbox 360 (even with edge), PSP, Vita, and any system running an outdated web browser that lets the packet fence read MAC addresses. This includes older devices and IoT gadgets, since all their traffic still passes through the hotel network using a MAC address (or several) linked to their name. <removed> Updated July 6, 2018 by SansVarnic

X
xXAtariXx
Junior Member
18
06-29-2016, 05:54 AM
#6
The discussion centers on Captive Portals and their interaction with blocking software or hardware. It appears the request is legal and not intended to violate any rules. This topic remains open for conversation. Openly addressing moderation isn't permitted. If you encounter a problem, report it so the Mod team can assist. The user mentioned he cannot connect due to hotel policies using captive portals that block his devices; he seeks guidance on setting up a workaround with his laptop. Overall, no suspicious activity is present in this help request.
X
xXAtariXx
06-29-2016, 05:54 AM #6

The discussion centers on Captive Portals and their interaction with blocking software or hardware. It appears the request is legal and not intended to violate any rules. This topic remains open for conversation. Openly addressing moderation isn't permitted. If you encounter a problem, report it so the Mod team can assist. The user mentioned he cannot connect due to hotel policies using captive portals that block his devices; he seeks guidance on setting up a workaround with his laptop. Overall, no suspicious activity is present in this help request.

K
Kusiu4444
Member
170
06-29-2016, 11:44 AM
#7
That has about a 0.01% chance of working. Most receptionist level staff have no idea about that kind of stuff, and even if they do they probably don't have any level of admin access to the equipment.
K
Kusiu4444
06-29-2016, 11:44 AM #7

That has about a 0.01% chance of working. Most receptionist level staff have no idea about that kind of stuff, and even if they do they probably don't have any level of admin access to the equipment.

M
MasterCed
Member
65
06-29-2016, 04:37 PM
#8
It's a security barrier at the entrance, not the pool gate. Your keycard should grant access.
M
MasterCed
06-29-2016, 04:37 PM #8

It's a security barrier at the entrance, not the pool gate. Your keycard should grant access.

B
BigAndLess
Junior Member
11
06-29-2016, 10:06 PM
#9
pfSense might be too much, but the native Windows sharing should suffice. After logging in on the laptop, connected devices should function smoothly. Even linking the access point directly usually works better and offers stronger signal than a laptop. Just turn off DNS caching—usually a smart move since captive portals often interfere with it—and re-authenticate with the laptop. I’m puzzled about the Xbox 360 and Switch not connecting. I’ve used the Switch before; it sometimes needs a few tries before showing up, but eventually the login appears. Still, using the laptop is simpler for maintaining connections. It won’t bypass all captive portals that require frequent re-authentication, unless you’re there at the moment. Some offer REST APIs for automated login, though they tend to complicate things more than help. I only used it on FON when a friend lacked broadband; I set up OpenWRT to keep pinging Google DNS and re-authenticating if blocked, while active clients appeared in the ARP table.
B
BigAndLess
06-29-2016, 10:06 PM #9

pfSense might be too much, but the native Windows sharing should suffice. After logging in on the laptop, connected devices should function smoothly. Even linking the access point directly usually works better and offers stronger signal than a laptop. Just turn off DNS caching—usually a smart move since captive portals often interfere with it—and re-authenticate with the laptop. I’m puzzled about the Xbox 360 and Switch not connecting. I’ve used the Switch before; it sometimes needs a few tries before showing up, but eventually the login appears. Still, using the laptop is simpler for maintaining connections. It won’t bypass all captive portals that require frequent re-authentication, unless you’re there at the moment. Some offer REST APIs for automated login, though they tend to complicate things more than help. I only used it on FON when a friend lacked broadband; I set up OpenWRT to keep pinging Google DNS and re-authenticating if blocked, while active clients appeared in the ARP table.

P
Pika756
Junior Member
21
06-29-2016, 10:49 PM
#10
I initially thought the switch wouldn't function since no browser was available, but I overlooked a specific one designed just for this task—really frustrating because I needed a proper browser on my device. I’m unsure how effective it is, though I’ve heard some users can’t access it even on hotel networks. The 360 version of Edge didn’t work well with most packet fence portals. My former IT department had a rule for 360s that included the MAC address.
P
Pika756
06-29-2016, 10:49 PM #10

I initially thought the switch wouldn't function since no browser was available, but I overlooked a specific one designed just for this task—really frustrating because I needed a proper browser on my device. I’m unsure how effective it is, though I’ve heard some users can’t access it even on hotel networks. The 360 version of Edge didn’t work well with most packet fence portals. My former IT department had a rule for 360s that included the MAC address.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next