F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop My favorite old CPU is the Intel 80486.

My favorite old CPU is the Intel 80486.

My favorite old CPU is the Intel 80486.

E
erikramoz
Member
65
08-11-2016, 04:48 PM
#1
Did you ever use an older CPU that worked well for you? Your 4770 stayed solid throughout your setup. It’s confusing how a reliable maker could release weaker models like the 13 and 14 series. You switched to an AMD CPU because of those issues.
E
erikramoz
08-11-2016, 04:48 PM #1

Did you ever use an older CPU that worked well for you? Your 4770 stayed solid throughout your setup. It’s confusing how a reliable maker could release weaker models like the 13 and 14 series. You switched to an AMD CPU because of those issues.

L
LarsMatena
Senior Member
602
08-14-2016, 12:05 PM
#2
The Motorola 68000 shaped my early experiences, followed by ample time learning with its successors 68030 and 68040. The PowerPC "G3" also made a significant impact, introducing substantial L2 cache and higher clock speeds to the established 603ev architecture.
L
LarsMatena
08-14-2016, 12:05 PM #2

The Motorola 68000 shaped my early experiences, followed by ample time learning with its successors 68030 and 68040. The PowerPC "G3" also made a significant impact, introducing substantial L2 cache and higher clock speeds to the established 603ev architecture.

C
Crimsonhawk10
Junior Member
20
08-14-2016, 02:57 PM
#3
I really enjoyed my i7-950! I boosted its speed to 4.2ghz, which is a 25% jump. It was amazing. I still own it along with my old Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R.
C
Crimsonhawk10
08-14-2016, 02:57 PM #3

I really enjoyed my i7-950! I boosted its speed to 4.2ghz, which is a 25% jump. It was amazing. I still own it along with my old Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R.

L
Linkiechu
Member
145
08-14-2016, 05:57 PM
#4
I've had my favorites over the years, especially that old Opteron 165. It could handle high performance all day long and still holds some benchmarks today. Back then, these chips were popular for being affordable yet powerful. I never imagined I'd own the best Opty 165, but it did happen.
L
Linkiechu
08-14-2016, 05:57 PM #4

I've had my favorites over the years, especially that old Opteron 165. It could handle high performance all day long and still holds some benchmarks today. Back then, these chips were popular for being affordable yet powerful. I never imagined I'd own the best Opty 165, but it did happen.

M
MikeBenj
Member
209
08-14-2016, 06:54 PM
#5
mainly the 32nm i7s/xeon w chips, especially the w3680 and 980x, stand out because of their solid value and performance. Many boards can reach around 4.8 at lower voltages, while triple-channel DDR3 delivers close to 2800 on Gigabyte boards. I also have both 45nm models, like the Nehalems, which offer decent performance thanks to their good IMC and stable operation.

The 45nm chips are decent, though high clock speeds aren’t great due to the triple-channel setup and memory requirements. They’re reliable but not the fastest.

In comparison, the older LN2 chips have similar IMC quality but struggle with stability at higher frequencies.

The W3503 is a solid choice for air cooling, hitting around 3400MHz, which is impressive compared to previous generations. It’s not the absolute top, but it performs well and is stable when paired with good RAM setups.

Keep in mind that the 930i still shows promise, especially with stable configurations, though it’s not yet the benchmark.
M
MikeBenj
08-14-2016, 06:54 PM #5

mainly the 32nm i7s/xeon w chips, especially the w3680 and 980x, stand out because of their solid value and performance. Many boards can reach around 4.8 at lower voltages, while triple-channel DDR3 delivers close to 2800 on Gigabyte boards. I also have both 45nm models, like the Nehalems, which offer decent performance thanks to their good IMC and stable operation.

The 45nm chips are decent, though high clock speeds aren’t great due to the triple-channel setup and memory requirements. They’re reliable but not the fastest.

In comparison, the older LN2 chips have similar IMC quality but struggle with stability at higher frequencies.

The W3503 is a solid choice for air cooling, hitting around 3400MHz, which is impressive compared to previous generations. It’s not the absolute top, but it performs well and is stable when paired with good RAM setups.

Keep in mind that the 930i still shows promise, especially with stable configurations, though it’s not yet the benchmark.

M
Mali249
Member
68
08-14-2016, 08:10 PM
#6
I just swapped out a faulty graphics card to restore my old office workstation, and it now has a 4790K inside. That chip performs well for everyday tasks and even in an H97 board—turbos are strong, and I’ve run architectural 3D rendering for over 24 hours without issues. The chip and board have always worked together smoothly, and I never faced any problems. If there’s a practical way to boost platform security, Windows 11 would handle it effortlessly.
M
Mali249
08-14-2016, 08:10 PM #6

I just swapped out a faulty graphics card to restore my old office workstation, and it now has a 4790K inside. That chip performs well for everyday tasks and even in an H97 board—turbos are strong, and I’ve run architectural 3D rendering for over 24 hours without issues. The chip and board have always worked together smoothly, and I never faced any problems. If there’s a practical way to boost platform security, Windows 11 would handle it effortlessly.

B
Bibble_Ele
Senior Member
447
08-14-2016, 10:03 PM
#7
I really enjoyed my Core 2 Duo E5400. It was an excellent overclocker at a low price. I managed to get it stable at 4.3GHz from 2.7GHz in air—it was incredibly fast. After that, I swapped it for an i5-2400, which didn’t meet expectations. Then I got a 5820k that performed well, but I ended up getting a 8700k with a free motherboard kit, so I went with that instead.
B
Bibble_Ele
08-14-2016, 10:03 PM #7

I really enjoyed my Core 2 Duo E5400. It was an excellent overclocker at a low price. I managed to get it stable at 4.3GHz from 2.7GHz in air—it was incredibly fast. After that, I swapped it for an i5-2400, which didn’t meet expectations. Then I got a 5820k that performed well, but I ended up getting a 8700k with a free motherboard kit, so I went with that instead.

F
FanEnsemble
Member
237
08-15-2016, 03:51 AM
#8
I’d choose the Athlon XP 2500+ (Barton). It has a 1800Mhz CPU that runs smoothly at 2400Mhz with only slight under-voltage.
F
FanEnsemble
08-15-2016, 03:51 AM #8

I’d choose the Athlon XP 2500+ (Barton). It has a 1800Mhz CPU that runs smoothly at 2400Mhz with only slight under-voltage.