Multiple CPUs share identical temperature readings.
Multiple CPUs share identical temperature readings.
Yes, it's feasible to observe multiple CPUs running on a single cooler. This helps determine the exact cooling capacity required, especially when TDP values can be misleading. For example, with high-end chips like the Hyper 212 3500 and others, you'll need more than just the CPU rating to ensure proper heat dissipation.
I concur, the 212 serves as an excellent starting point for testing with varying CPU speeds. It offers a balanced setup—standard, gentle, and strong overclocks—with 40 DBA normalization and the highest fan speed available on that cooler.
Applying paste might become challenging due to its strong influence. You might notice varying temperatures under identical conditions such as cooler, CPU, and paste.
They didn’t disprove the idea that the distinctions between techniques are minimal. Unless you use an extremely thin layer, even a generous amount isn’t problematic—though too much can cause issues with your motherboard.
I’ve seen it debunked several times by pros. They’re pros though. I’ve screwed it up once or twice myself. Temptation to quote my grandfather on the difference between foolproof and damnfool proof. Also when comparing stuff very small may still be enough to make one configuration edge out another. Remember this is being done because TDP isn’t being trusted. It could be done in a sufficiently uniform method for testing. A jig of some kind to control paste amount and location perhaps. Might not even need that. A bigger one would be air ambients, humidity, and simple breezes. Rough numbers could be gotten I guess.
The focus is on reviewing multiple tests across various CPUs using the same cooler. Buyers have options: choose a premium cooler or stick with the standard models like the 212. This provides some guidance.