F5F Stay Refreshed Software Operating Systems Moving from Windows to Linux involves changing your operating system.

Moving from Windows to Linux involves changing your operating system.

Moving from Windows to Linux involves changing your operating system.

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3 Next
L
lukemon5
Member
87
05-06-2016, 01:36 AM
#11
I handle only app installations. I always search for commands first, or I ask what the best Linux tool is.
L
lukemon5
05-06-2016, 01:36 AM #11

I handle only app installations. I always search for commands first, or I ask what the best Linux tool is.

T
Tanky201
Member
53
05-06-2016, 04:52 PM
#12
Absolutely understand. It's frustrating needing to reinstall everything because you didn't save a backup, especially when you wanted a fresh start and didn't have time to prepare.
T
Tanky201
05-06-2016, 04:52 PM #12

Absolutely understand. It's frustrating needing to reinstall everything because you didn't save a backup, especially when you wanted a fresh start and didn't have time to prepare.

H
henster12345
Member
71
05-06-2016, 05:59 PM
#13
I'm unsure about the "command to install apps" you're referring to. All required applications are already available in the Software Manager or as deb files that load similarly to an EXE file in Windows. From the 50+ users I know, none require any additional apps—those not already installed by me, and they don't need to use the Terminal.
H
henster12345
05-06-2016, 05:59 PM #13

I'm unsure about the "command to install apps" you're referring to. All required applications are already available in the Software Manager or as deb files that load similarly to an EXE file in Windows. From the 50+ users I know, none require any additional apps—those not already installed by me, and they don't need to use the Terminal.

F
FadingRainbow
Junior Member
16
05-07-2016, 05:13 PM
#14
Grok stands out clearly, even in unusual teaching moments like "grandma to suck eggs". /sigh. It seems he's highlighting the recent addition of a "GUI software manager" to Linux distros' standard GUI tools. TBPH, it’s important to add cross-distro aliases to /etc/bash/bashrc.d/software-management-aliases.bash. No known distribution uses commands like "install", "uninstall" or "install-search"; everything relies on dpkg, apt, pacman, rpm, emerge, etc. There’s no justification for not having a consistent method for installing, uninstalling, or searching packages—making aliases a minimal but effective solution. The same applies to "install-search": enable descriptions or tags so you can find specific items like "music player" or "web browser". Yes, these features are available in most package managers, but lacking such standards limits usability and consistency.
F
FadingRainbow
05-07-2016, 05:13 PM #14

Grok stands out clearly, even in unusual teaching moments like "grandma to suck eggs". /sigh. It seems he's highlighting the recent addition of a "GUI software manager" to Linux distros' standard GUI tools. TBPH, it’s important to add cross-distro aliases to /etc/bash/bashrc.d/software-management-aliases.bash. No known distribution uses commands like "install", "uninstall" or "install-search"; everything relies on dpkg, apt, pacman, rpm, emerge, etc. There’s no justification for not having a consistent method for installing, uninstalling, or searching packages—making aliases a minimal but effective solution. The same applies to "install-search": enable descriptions or tags so you can find specific items like "music player" or "web browser". Yes, these features are available in most package managers, but lacking such standards limits usability and consistency.

M
MilckyDreams_
Member
234
05-09-2016, 09:55 AM
#15
It seems you're curious about older versions of Linux Mint. Many people still use the same tools they found years ago, so it makes sense to explore them.
M
MilckyDreams_
05-09-2016, 09:55 AM #15

It seems you're curious about older versions of Linux Mint. Many people still use the same tools they found years ago, so it makes sense to explore them.

D
Dracode
Member
150
05-11-2016, 12:51 AM
#16
I understand you're familiar with installing packages via sudo apt and flatpak, but sometimes they have different names. Flatpak isn't included in the Software Manager, and only a few of the ten apps required installation through the terminal.
D
Dracode
05-11-2016, 12:51 AM #16

I understand you're familiar with installing packages via sudo apt and flatpak, but sometimes they have different names. Flatpak isn't included in the Software Manager, and only a few of the ten apps required installation through the terminal.

K
KillSt3al
Member
113
05-11-2016, 12:58 AM
#17
I really enjoyed Software Manager on Linux Mint—it performed well. However, not all applications are available for it.
K
KillSt3al
05-11-2016, 12:58 AM #17

I really enjoyed Software Manager on Linux Mint—it performed well. However, not all applications are available for it.

G
gidabro
Junior Member
13
05-11-2016, 03:16 AM
#18
Besides Mint 11 it seems to look quite appealing: Bro, I meant to say "think," we've been chatting here long enough that you should realize if I need to "actively think" the chances of getting bad results are over 50%. Now pose a simple question about kernel hacking for unsupported hardware—why SATA interfaces seem to "shout" electronically in about 99% of cases, or a script to automate some tricky driver setup—I know exactly what I can do without having to "think."
G
gidabro
05-11-2016, 03:16 AM #18

Besides Mint 11 it seems to look quite appealing: Bro, I meant to say "think," we've been chatting here long enough that you should realize if I need to "actively think" the chances of getting bad results are over 50%. Now pose a simple question about kernel hacking for unsupported hardware—why SATA interfaces seem to "shout" electronically in about 99% of cases, or a script to automate some tricky driver setup—I know exactly what I can do without having to "think."

A
Aero103
Junior Member
11
05-11-2016, 06:59 AM
#19
PackageKit aimed to deliver what it was meant to with a graphical interface, yet no command-line tool exists. Flatpak gains traction and many standard applications are likely shifting there. Original software will stay, but future updates may prioritize core components like desktop environments and drivers, while server tools gain from dynamic library linking at fixed system locations. I suspect this trend is ongoing; vendors aiming for cross-distro compatibility should stick with Flatpak. This isn’t a full excuse, but it highlights that Intel wireless NICs maintain strong support across distros, including Fedora. Fedora occupies a unique position between stable releases and rolling updates, with major versions every six months and frequent minor patches. Such situations can occasionally cause brief issues, which are typically resolved swiftly.
A
Aero103
05-11-2016, 06:59 AM #19

PackageKit aimed to deliver what it was meant to with a graphical interface, yet no command-line tool exists. Flatpak gains traction and many standard applications are likely shifting there. Original software will stay, but future updates may prioritize core components like desktop environments and drivers, while server tools gain from dynamic library linking at fixed system locations. I suspect this trend is ongoing; vendors aiming for cross-distro compatibility should stick with Flatpak. This isn’t a full excuse, but it highlights that Intel wireless NICs maintain strong support across distros, including Fedora. Fedora occupies a unique position between stable releases and rolling updates, with major versions every six months and frequent minor patches. Such situations can occasionally cause brief issues, which are typically resolved swiftly.

J
Jes987
Junior Member
48
05-11-2016, 10:15 AM
#20
It might be an issue with my computer, but I think the Mint software manager isn’t great. It performs poorly and has a clunky design. I’d suggest beginners use apt instead of the manager—searching and installing via apt is simpler than using the software manager.
J
Jes987
05-11-2016, 10:15 AM #20

It might be an issue with my computer, but I think the Mint software manager isn’t great. It performs poorly and has a clunky design. I’d suggest beginners use apt instead of the manager—searching and installing via apt is simpler than using the software manager.

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3 Next