F5F Stay Refreshed Software Operating Systems Movie maker vs After Effects

Movie maker vs After Effects

Movie maker vs After Effects

O
ozhi
Junior Member
7
11-20-2016, 12:31 PM
#1
I didn't understand the name of this subject, but it seems connected to the title. I'm a bit confused. I tried using Movie Maker and After Effects to create the same video, but After Effects rendered it at 59 fps while Movie Maker did it at 29 fps. The After Effects file was about 200mb, whereas the Movie Maker version was around 60mb.?!?! Why would a higher frame rate result in a larger file? Also, I'm curious about which is better for short videos with up to two minutes of gameplay. So far I've used shadow play to capture gameplay and edited it with Movie Maker, but the quality drops after editing—both in frame rate and detail. After Effects has produced frames at the same fps yet doesn't preserve the same level of detail as seen in-game. Which one is more suitable for editing? Is there a way to avoid compression that could affect quality? Lastly, do you have any suggestions for editing or recording software? Thanks ahead.
O
ozhi
11-20-2016, 12:31 PM #1

I didn't understand the name of this subject, but it seems connected to the title. I'm a bit confused. I tried using Movie Maker and After Effects to create the same video, but After Effects rendered it at 59 fps while Movie Maker did it at 29 fps. The After Effects file was about 200mb, whereas the Movie Maker version was around 60mb.?!?! Why would a higher frame rate result in a larger file? Also, I'm curious about which is better for short videos with up to two minutes of gameplay. So far I've used shadow play to capture gameplay and edited it with Movie Maker, but the quality drops after editing—both in frame rate and detail. After Effects has produced frames at the same fps yet doesn't preserve the same level of detail as seen in-game. Which one is more suitable for editing? Is there a way to avoid compression that could affect quality? Lastly, do you have any suggestions for editing or recording software? Thanks ahead.

T
147
11-28-2016, 08:11 PM
#2
It might be due to the fact that the films were rendered in a higher compression video format.
T
TannerBannaner
11-28-2016, 08:11 PM #2

It might be due to the fact that the films were rendered in a higher compression video format.

D
Durchgebraten
Junior Member
17
12-06-2016, 04:53 AM
#3
Adobe Premiere shines for editing tasks, while After Effects excels at 2.5D compositing. Premiere works well with multi-shot sequences, allowing you to move clips between them seamlessly. If you use both, you can transfer footage from Premiere into After Effects and edit them together in sync. The differences in frame rate and file size depend on your settings. Regardless of the software, the codec determines speed and storage requirements.
D
Durchgebraten
12-06-2016, 04:53 AM #3

Adobe Premiere shines for editing tasks, while After Effects excels at 2.5D compositing. Premiere works well with multi-shot sequences, allowing you to move clips between them seamlessly. If you use both, you can transfer footage from Premiere into After Effects and edit them together in sync. The differences in frame rate and file size depend on your settings. Regardless of the software, the codec determines speed and storage requirements.

W
wiiNinjaOne
Junior Member
16
12-06-2016, 12:47 PM
#4
Initially it's not possible to directly compare AE and Movie Maker. The specific codec and bit rate configurations in each tool differ. If all parameters matched, the version with a higher frame rate typically results in a bigger file. But if one program uses a higher bit rate or a less compressive codec, it will generate a larger size. For editing videos, Premiere is recommended, while After Effects handles motion graphics and effects. The quality issues after editing are likely linked to export settings. A suitable codec should maintain quality without excessive compression. You might want to explore Lightworks Free, DaVinci Resolve 12 Free, or Hitfilms Express 3.
W
wiiNinjaOne
12-06-2016, 12:47 PM #4

Initially it's not possible to directly compare AE and Movie Maker. The specific codec and bit rate configurations in each tool differ. If all parameters matched, the version with a higher frame rate typically results in a bigger file. But if one program uses a higher bit rate or a less compressive codec, it will generate a larger size. For editing videos, Premiere is recommended, while After Effects handles motion graphics and effects. The quality issues after editing are likely linked to export settings. A suitable codec should maintain quality without excessive compression. You might want to explore Lightworks Free, DaVinci Resolve 12 Free, or Hitfilms Express 3.

L
LeStylez
Member
145
12-06-2016, 01:57 PM
#5
Thank you, I will install premiere.
L
LeStylez
12-06-2016, 01:57 PM #5

Thank you, I will install premiere.

D
DantehIsGay
Posting Freak
902
12-06-2016, 06:24 PM
#6
Thank you very much!
D
DantehIsGay
12-06-2016, 06:24 PM #6

Thank you very much!