Modem → Ethernet-only router → wireless access point?
Modem → Ethernet-only router → wireless access point?
Thank you so much!!! That EdgeRouter seems like exactly the kind of thing I'm looking for!!! Do you know if there's a technical name for this kind of ethernet-only router that'll help me search for others to compare those UniFi ones to? Building my own pfSense/whatever router is a bit beyond the scope of what I'm trying to achieve right now, but is something I might do in the future
Most consumer routers let you disable WiFi broadcasting while LAN ports remain functional. You can also add a second router in AP mode connected via Ethernet. Many routers offer this feature for testing purposes. A mesh network might be better if you need reliable connectivity across devices, especially for streaming games. The term refers to both wireless and wired routers, unlike a wireless one which uses WLAN.
Wired router available with two configurations supporting 10 gig connections. SFP+ compatibility demands either DAC or RJ-45 transceiver usage. See product links for details: https://store.ui.com/products/udm-pro and https://www.amazon.com/QNAP-QHora-301W-A...B08MQT9ZCX
I was aiming for dedicated hardware now that I understand the right term—I feel like I’ve opened up some possibilities! Thanks for the suggestions; I’ll check them out. SFP really catches my eye and could help with future-proofing, though it might mean waiting longer. Why does every router seem to have just one 2.5Gbps Ethernet port? That’s a bit confusing.
Note that SFP+ isn't always superior—it just offers a different approach. The key advantage lies in its affordability and sufficient performance for short distances (with reasonably priced DAC cables) and extended fiber connections. I rely on SFP+ DAC cables for my NAS/switch and connect via RJ45 to my desktop, which is farther away. This provides cost benefits. An example model is the ASUS ROG Rapture GT-AX6000, though it comes with a higher price tag.
The S33 seems to be the top choice for high-end cable modems, featuring a 2.5 Gbps Ethernet port that should match most coax providers' capabilities. Ubiqtuti appears to be the option you're considering. Mikrotik likely offers some wired-only models as well. In general, you'll probably need to explore more professional or business-grade equipment, since consumer devices often include WiFi for convenience, not because it's necessary.
Sure, unless you're into a PC, there are really affordable options available. I just bought one with 2.5Gbit speed for pfSense.
Discussing only regular cable modems, not gateways. Gateways aren't worth it. Stick with a standard modem whenever possible.
They are both labeled 2.5gbps, but they serve different purposes. The WAN port connects to the wider internet, while the LAN port links to your local network. The naming reflects their scope rather than speed differences.
LAN refers to a link within a local area network while WAN handles connections across wide areas. In real life this often means using the internet for WAN and a local network for LAN. Most routers support nearly all ports, letting you manage traffic between different systems. Typically you get one public IP from your service provider, and the router lets you distribute it. This keeps costs low. The main concern would be energy usage—especially in regions with high rates, like parts of California where electricity averages 27 cents per kilowatt-hour—and a draw of around 30 watts could add about $70 to your annual bill.