F5F Stay Refreshed Software Operating Systems Minimal Linux system ideal for older computers

Minimal Linux system ideal for older computers

Minimal Linux system ideal for older computers

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
F
Fear_Berzerk
Member
63
02-29-2016, 06:42 PM
#1
You're considering Linux for your slow laptop. It's running an AMD E1-2100 APU with Radeon HD Graphics and 4GB DDR3 RAM. The issue is high CPU usage when using apps, especially YouTube. You're looking for a stable distro that won't overheat or strain the system further.
F
Fear_Berzerk
02-29-2016, 06:42 PM #1

You're considering Linux for your slow laptop. It's running an AMD E1-2100 APU with Radeon HD Graphics and 4GB DDR3 RAM. The issue is high CPU usage when using apps, especially YouTube. You're looking for a stable distro that won't overheat or strain the system further.

M
MrCm
Senior Member
636
03-01-2016, 02:21 AM
#2
I run on Lubuntu for these devices, it performs well. I also tested it on a vintage Pentium 4 Laptop, which functioned adequately.
M
MrCm
03-01-2016, 02:21 AM #2

I run on Lubuntu for these devices, it performs well. I also tested it on a vintage Pentium 4 Laptop, which functioned adequately.

C
cookiedough909
Posting Freak
782
03-11-2016, 02:23 PM
#3
Lubuntu is the best choice for you!
C
cookiedough909
03-11-2016, 02:23 PM #3

Lubuntu is the best choice for you!

F
Flo70
Junior Member
3
03-11-2016, 03:35 PM
#4
Plus one for Lubuntu. For a more adventurous option, consider one of the CrunchBang branches (BunsenLabs might be the top choice).
F
Flo70
03-11-2016, 03:35 PM #4

Plus one for Lubuntu. For a more adventurous option, consider one of the CrunchBang branches (BunsenLabs might be the top choice).

Z
Zoe783
Member
180
03-11-2016, 04:10 PM
#5
Lubuntu is a great starting point, though your 2-core, 1GHZ system might feel a bit slow. Even a modest SSD can significantly improve performance. You have two choices: replace LXDE with bare Openbox for a minimal setup and install a taskbar yourself, which will run quickly and efficiently—compared to LXDE—or consider Puppy Linux, an extremely lightweight distro that’s lighter than Lubuntu but still functional.
Z
Zoe783
03-11-2016, 04:10 PM #5

Lubuntu is a great starting point, though your 2-core, 1GHZ system might feel a bit slow. Even a modest SSD can significantly improve performance. You have two choices: replace LXDE with bare Openbox for a minimal setup and install a taskbar yourself, which will run quickly and efficiently—compared to LXDE—or consider Puppy Linux, an extremely lightweight distro that’s lighter than Lubuntu but still functional.

N
Nybu
Member
160
03-31-2016, 12:50 PM
#6
Openbox is excellent. I run an older IBM T42 with Debian, and it functions perfectly. It may not be the strongest option, but it gets the task done since I mostly connect via SSH from a laptop. I suggest checking out https://www.bunsenlabs.org/ if you're just starting with Openbox. It's a solid introduction, and you can later switch to plain Debian and customize your settings.
N
Nybu
03-31-2016, 12:50 PM #6

Openbox is excellent. I run an older IBM T42 with Debian, and it functions perfectly. It may not be the strongest option, but it gets the task done since I mostly connect via SSH from a laptop. I suggest checking out https://www.bunsenlabs.org/ if you're just starting with Openbox. It's a solid introduction, and you can later switch to plain Debian and customize your settings.

C
68
04-05-2016, 12:50 AM
#7
There are options available for that hardware.
C
CaptainJacob13
04-05-2016, 12:50 AM #7

There are options available for that hardware.

T
tamemarco
Senior Member
482
04-05-2016, 03:52 AM
#8
I've seen that newer desktop setups tend to consume more RAM. Unless you're using a very weak integrated graphics card and applying heavy effects, they usually don't strain the CPU or GPU. The main concern is the apps you run. For instance, Firefox can be quite demanding on the processor. The operating system or distribution you choose won't change this situation. You might notice a slight improvement by switching to a smaller swap file, which frees up RAM for the system cache. Alternatively, if you're often running low on memory, a lighter desktop environment could help—just because of insufficient RAM. EDIT: I also realized your CPU speed is 1000MHz. In that case, a simpler desktop might actually be beneficial! Try it yourself.
T
tamemarco
04-05-2016, 03:52 AM #8

I've seen that newer desktop setups tend to consume more RAM. Unless you're using a very weak integrated graphics card and applying heavy effects, they usually don't strain the CPU or GPU. The main concern is the apps you run. For instance, Firefox can be quite demanding on the processor. The operating system or distribution you choose won't change this situation. You might notice a slight improvement by switching to a smaller swap file, which frees up RAM for the system cache. Alternatively, if you're often running low on memory, a lighter desktop environment could help—just because of insufficient RAM. EDIT: I also realized your CPU speed is 1000MHz. In that case, a simpler desktop might actually be beneficial! Try it yourself.

L
Lior1001
Member
143
04-10-2016, 04:06 PM
#9
Have you used OpenBSD before?
L
Lior1001
04-10-2016, 04:06 PM #9

Have you used OpenBSD before?

R
ReborntoKill
Posting Freak
821
04-10-2016, 04:45 PM
#10
I tend to favor xfce-based systems. Xubuntu is an option if you prefer that, or MATE (a bit more resource-intensive but excellent).
R
ReborntoKill
04-10-2016, 04:45 PM #10

I tend to favor xfce-based systems. Xubuntu is an option if you prefer that, or MATE (a bit more resource-intensive but excellent).

Pages (2): 1 2 Next