F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Memory XMP settings might affect processor performance.

Memory XMP settings might affect processor performance.

Memory XMP settings might affect processor performance.

Q
197
12-26-2016, 10:52 AM
#1
Experiencing problems with a Haswell CPU paired with a 2x16GB memory setup on a friend's PC. Motherboard model: Gigabyte GA-X99-UD3 (rev. 1.0). BIOS: F23c Memory: G.Skill F4-3000C16D-32GISB CPU: Intel i7 5820K With XMP disabled, the processor runs smoothly and reaches up to 100% at 2100 MHz. 15-15-15-36. However, when XMP is activated (only one profile), the speed caps around 2.9GHz and performance tests like Cinebench R20 or Prime95 stay under 90%. From the CinebenchR20 results, I saw the CPU clock display as 3751Mhz on MSI Afterburners while reviewing images. We attempted to adjust XMP settings manually—changing frequency, timings, and voltage—but the system wouldn’t boot. We also tried setting it to 2600Mhz with a lower multiplier (1.35v), but then the Processor Base Clock Multiplier was reduced to 1.25 (125Mhz) instead of the default 100Mhz, causing memory frequency to drop to 2400Mhz. Now we’re running without XMP or manual tweaks, yet performance remains limited. I’m puzzled because an XMP profile would normally boost the base clock significantly, yet utilization stays low. Picture of default settings with XMP active. This makes me question whether Task Manager is using a fixed 100Mhz BCLK by default and why that might cause the 90% usage. Am I right in thinking everything works fine when XMP is enabled, but Task Manager misrepresents it? - Should I check if Task Manager defaults to 100Mhz BCLK? Would that explain the low utilization? - Is there a way to modify Task Manager’s settings so it reflects a higher BCLK? - If not, what options exist to achieve speeds beyond 2133Mhz?
Q
Quinnsillyhead
12-26-2016, 10:52 AM #1

Experiencing problems with a Haswell CPU paired with a 2x16GB memory setup on a friend's PC. Motherboard model: Gigabyte GA-X99-UD3 (rev. 1.0). BIOS: F23c Memory: G.Skill F4-3000C16D-32GISB CPU: Intel i7 5820K With XMP disabled, the processor runs smoothly and reaches up to 100% at 2100 MHz. 15-15-15-36. However, when XMP is activated (only one profile), the speed caps around 2.9GHz and performance tests like Cinebench R20 or Prime95 stay under 90%. From the CinebenchR20 results, I saw the CPU clock display as 3751Mhz on MSI Afterburners while reviewing images. We attempted to adjust XMP settings manually—changing frequency, timings, and voltage—but the system wouldn’t boot. We also tried setting it to 2600Mhz with a lower multiplier (1.35v), but then the Processor Base Clock Multiplier was reduced to 1.25 (125Mhz) instead of the default 100Mhz, causing memory frequency to drop to 2400Mhz. Now we’re running without XMP or manual tweaks, yet performance remains limited. I’m puzzled because an XMP profile would normally boost the base clock significantly, yet utilization stays low. Picture of default settings with XMP active. This makes me question whether Task Manager is using a fixed 100Mhz BCLK by default and why that might cause the 90% usage. Am I right in thinking everything works fine when XMP is enabled, but Task Manager misrepresents it? - Should I check if Task Manager defaults to 100Mhz BCLK? Would that explain the low utilization? - Is there a way to modify Task Manager’s settings so it reflects a higher BCLK? - If not, what options exist to achieve speeds beyond 2133Mhz?

L
lTalonzl
Member
147
12-28-2016, 11:11 AM
#2
Use tools such as CPU-Z or Hwinfo to monitor CPU speed. On your 2600k system, Task Manager shows BCLK at 100MHz, but this isn't always accurate. A 125MHz reading comes from a BCLK strap technique used in the past to boost clock speeds effectively.
L
lTalonzl
12-28-2016, 11:11 AM #2

Use tools such as CPU-Z or Hwinfo to monitor CPU speed. On your 2600k system, Task Manager shows BCLK at 100MHz, but this isn't always accurate. A 125MHz reading comes from a BCLK strap technique used in the past to boost clock speeds effectively.

C
ColSpeed
Member
197
12-28-2016, 06:45 PM
#3
HWinfo accurately displays the expected results. Appreciate your assistance in understanding the observations.
C
ColSpeed
12-28-2016, 06:45 PM #3

HWinfo accurately displays the expected results. Appreciate your assistance in understanding the observations.