F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop LTT recording of RAM modules and performance at 8x versus 16x speed

LTT recording of RAM modules and performance at 8x versus 16x speed

LTT recording of RAM modules and performance at 8x versus 16x speed

X
xXFirewitherXx
Posting Freak
878
01-31-2023, 02:16 AM
#1
Hey everyone, just checked the video about RAM banks and the speed boost from switching to x16 instead of x8. It’s really disappointing that few suppliers share such detailed info. I’ve tried CPUz and RAMMon, but neither shows the bank count or x value for your system. Maybe I misinterpreted the data? Are there any tools that provide this level of detail? Thanks, Paddy UK!
X
xXFirewitherXx
01-31-2023, 02:16 AM #1

Hey everyone, just checked the video about RAM banks and the speed boost from switching to x16 instead of x8. It’s really disappointing that few suppliers share such detailed info. I’ve tried CPUz and RAMMon, but neither shows the bank count or x value for your system. Maybe I misinterpreted the data? Are there any tools that provide this level of detail? Thanks, Paddy UK!

T
TheTNTGamer
Member
65
02-03-2023, 04:59 PM
#2
Consider Aida64 and comparable solutions.
T
TheTNTGamer
02-03-2023, 04:59 PM #2

Consider Aida64 and comparable solutions.

L
LukinhasPvP13
Member
68
02-03-2023, 08:29 PM
#3
@mariushm, I'm excited to try this out and share my feedback. Thanks, Paddy UK!
L
LukinhasPvP13
02-03-2023, 08:29 PM #3

@mariushm, I'm excited to try this out and share my feedback. Thanks, Paddy UK!

W
woodskill137
Member
60
02-03-2023, 09:41 PM
#4
You might want to use HWiNFO64. My system has 2 x8 RAM, which is dual rank x8.
W
woodskill137
02-03-2023, 09:41 PM #4

You might want to use HWiNFO64. My system has 2 x8 RAM, which is dual rank x8.

T
Tyclonek
Member
81
02-04-2023, 04:15 AM
#5
@Chiyawa - I'll look into this later once I'm back. Thanks, Paddy UK!
T
Tyclonek
02-04-2023, 04:15 AM #5

@Chiyawa - I'll look into this later once I'm back. Thanks, Paddy UK!

H
126
02-05-2023, 06:59 PM
#6
I returned to the house. For reference, here’s what Aida64 shared about my memory—remembered at 1333 MHz, no need to restart the PC, it’s been active for more than a month.
H
HUNGERGAMEMARK
02-05-2023, 06:59 PM #6

I returned to the house. For reference, here’s what Aida64 shared about my memory—remembered at 1333 MHz, no need to restart the PC, it’s been active for more than a month.

Z
Zadaki3l
Member
64
02-19-2023, 07:36 PM
#7
Hi @mariushm and @Chiyawa, thank you for your support. I installed Aida64 (trial) and HWINFO64 on my laptop to monitor memory performance. With Aida64, the results suggest this Corsair RAM is likely the slower x16 variant. In contrast, HWINFO64 doesn’t show the same data as @Chiyawa—no Banks listed, just Ranks—which might be due to using DDR4 instead of DDR3. Appreciate your help!
Z
Zadaki3l
02-19-2023, 07:36 PM #7

Hi @mariushm and @Chiyawa, thank you for your support. I installed Aida64 (trial) and HWINFO64 on my laptop to monitor memory performance. With Aida64, the results suggest this Corsair RAM is likely the slower x16 variant. In contrast, HWINFO64 doesn’t show the same data as @Chiyawa—no Banks listed, just Ranks—which might be due to using DDR4 instead of DDR3. Appreciate your help!

B
BlueStar_LH
Posting Freak
842
02-19-2023, 11:03 PM
#8
Hi @mariushm and @Chiyawa, just confirming your thoughts at your convenience. Thanks for your time!
Best regards, Paddy UK
B
BlueStar_LH
02-19-2023, 11:03 PM #8

Hi @mariushm and @Chiyawa, just confirming your thoughts at your convenience. Thanks for your time!
Best regards, Paddy UK

T
teluge
Member
50
02-27-2023, 12:32 AM
#9
It's tricky to describe what you're seeing. The bad, slow RAM sticks are usually 1 rank built from 4 chips. A single RAM stick is 64 bits wide, so you need 4 chips that are 16 bits each, or 8 chips at 8 bits, or even 16 chips at 4 bits (common on servers). Most of the time these sticks have 8 chips, meaning two ranks—each made from 4 chips of 16 bits. This setup makes them slower than a regular stick with 8 chips per rank at 8 bits, but the controller benefits from having two ranks working together. It's not perfect, but it's not the slowest either. The video below might help clarify things.
T
teluge
02-27-2023, 12:32 AM #9

It's tricky to describe what you're seeing. The bad, slow RAM sticks are usually 1 rank built from 4 chips. A single RAM stick is 64 bits wide, so you need 4 chips that are 16 bits each, or 8 chips at 8 bits, or even 16 chips at 4 bits (common on servers). Most of the time these sticks have 8 chips, meaning two ranks—each made from 4 chips of 16 bits. This setup makes them slower than a regular stick with 8 chips per rank at 8 bits, but the controller benefits from having two ranks working together. It's not perfect, but it's not the slowest either. The video below might help clarify things.

E
ExplodingNt
Member
107
03-02-2023, 04:20 PM
#10
I'm sorry for the oversight, but I'm currently diving deep into this topic and found it on Google. It seems the information might be outdated for the original poster. However, it appears the RAM is likely x8 rather than x16, as indicated by HWiFO64. The module's description matches an x8 configuration, with 16 banks as shown in the datasheet. The module labeled as x16 would have been interpreted differently, possibly showing only 8 banks. My RAM model, a G.skill F4-3600C16D-32GVKC, displays 16 chips and is correctly shown as dual rank in all tested software. I reached this conclusion after reviewing the micron data sheet and the buildzoid video. It was a bit challenging due to varying terminology across different tools, but I'm confident in my assessment. If you have more questions, feel free to ask!
E
ExplodingNt
03-02-2023, 04:20 PM #10

I'm sorry for the oversight, but I'm currently diving deep into this topic and found it on Google. It seems the information might be outdated for the original poster. However, it appears the RAM is likely x8 rather than x16, as indicated by HWiFO64. The module's description matches an x8 configuration, with 16 banks as shown in the datasheet. The module labeled as x16 would have been interpreted differently, possibly showing only 8 banks. My RAM model, a G.skill F4-3600C16D-32GVKC, displays 16 chips and is correctly shown as dual rank in all tested software. I reached this conclusion after reviewing the micron data sheet and the buildzoid video. It was a bit challenging due to varying terminology across different tools, but I'm confident in my assessment. If you have more questions, feel free to ask!