F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Looking for the quickest DDR5 64GB module that fits your setup?

Looking for the quickest DDR5 64GB module that fits your setup?

Looking for the quickest DDR5 64GB module that fits your setup?

Pages (3): 1 2 3 Next
D
60
09-28-2022, 04:00 PM
#1
It seemed straightforward at first—just grab the highest RAM speed, like 6400 2x32—but turns out it’s more complex. I’m looking for the best setup that fully supports a 13900K and 4090 on the Asus Prime Z790-P WiFi. All I need is to enable XMP without any manual tuning.
D
Derpy_Unitatos
09-28-2022, 04:00 PM #1

It seemed straightforward at first—just grab the highest RAM speed, like 6400 2x32—but turns out it’s more complex. I’m looking for the best setup that fully supports a 13900K and 4090 on the Asus Prime Z790-P WiFi. All I need is to enable XMP without any manual tuning.

C
Char1ie_XD
Senior Member
578
10-06-2022, 04:22 PM
#2
In technical terms this would correspond to a 4400MT/s rated system, as that's the highest speed officially supported by the 13900K. In real-world use a 6400MT/s setup should perform well in a 2x32GB configuration, though you might need to adjust memory controller voltages if your IMC isn't very consistent—Intel’s memory controllers vary significantly across generations, especially with the 13th series CPUs offering broad performance differences. If you prefer simplicity, a 2x32GB DDR5 6000 kit should function adequately by activating XMP on most processors, though results could differ depending on your RAM specifications.
C
Char1ie_XD
10-06-2022, 04:22 PM #2

In technical terms this would correspond to a 4400MT/s rated system, as that's the highest speed officially supported by the 13900K. In real-world use a 6400MT/s setup should perform well in a 2x32GB configuration, though you might need to adjust memory controller voltages if your IMC isn't very consistent—Intel’s memory controllers vary significantly across generations, especially with the 13th series CPUs offering broad performance differences. If you prefer simplicity, a 2x32GB DDR5 6000 kit should function adequately by activating XMP on most processors, though results could differ depending on your RAM specifications.

R
Roycie_Bear
Member
181
10-06-2022, 06:16 PM
#3
Avoid this Asus board unless it's discounted. I only see 6000J3040G32GX2-TZ5RS listed in QVL.
R
Roycie_Bear
10-06-2022, 06:16 PM #3

Avoid this Asus board unless it's discounted. I only see 6000J3040G32GX2-TZ5RS listed in QVL.

C
CasualCraft
Junior Member
27
10-07-2022, 12:29 PM
#4
Thanks for your quick response! I'm feeling pretty confident about a 6000 kit working. Do you have any suggestions for a recommendation as well? I've got access to Kingston Fury Beast, Corsair Vengeance, Ripjaws, and Trident kits. I'll try to limit the 13900K a bit for better efficiency, but not too much.
C
CasualCraft
10-07-2022, 12:29 PM #4

Thanks for your quick response! I'm feeling pretty confident about a 6000 kit working. Do you have any suggestions for a recommendation as well? I've got access to Kingston Fury Beast, Corsair Vengeance, Ripjaws, and Trident kits. I'll try to limit the 13900K a bit for better efficiency, but not too much.

C
CelticGila
Senior Member
454
10-07-2022, 01:39 PM
#5
The board might not be ideal because it avoids the controversial Intel Ethernet controller that often causes connection drops. You're looking for alternatives that steer clear of this issue. I'm considering options from Gigabyte, Asus, Biostar, and ASRock, as well as the Prime Z790-P WiFi from Asus. The ASUS Z790-A Silver is also on the list. Your preference is for a board without Intel's Ethernet solution.
C
CelticGila
10-07-2022, 01:39 PM #5

The board might not be ideal because it avoids the controversial Intel Ethernet controller that often causes connection drops. You're looking for alternatives that steer clear of this issue. I'm considering options from Gigabyte, Asus, Biostar, and ASRock, as well as the Prime Z790-P WiFi from Asus. The ASUS Z790-A Silver is also on the list. Your preference is for a board without Intel's Ethernet solution.

D
Donald_Trumpz
Member
246
10-07-2022, 02:32 PM
#6
According to my understanding, WiFi problems have been resolved in the latest BIOS updates. Boards from Asrock and Gigabyte offer superior VRMs and additional features within this budget. I believe the Gigabyte Z790 AORUS ELITE AX stands out as the top choice in this price range.
D
Donald_Trumpz
10-07-2022, 02:32 PM #6

According to my understanding, WiFi problems have been resolved in the latest BIOS updates. Boards from Asrock and Gigabyte offer superior VRMs and additional features within this budget. I believe the Gigabyte Z790 AORUS ELITE AX stands out as the top choice in this price range.

I
162
10-19-2022, 05:34 PM
#7
Some options should work. If you prefer a stronger build, consider the CL32 or CL30 DDR5 6000 kits instead of the CL36 ones, though all are decent. Generally, RAM performs well and these kits should be acceptable. If prices match, the Kingston Fury kit is a solid choice due to its robust heat spreaders, even though overclocking isn’t necessary for most users. Two main concerns: ASUS’s recent quality control has been average at best. Notable problems include reverse-soldered capacitors on some Z690 boards that caused fires, and limited memory performance on certain Z690 Apex models despite their overclocking focus. The Z790 Apex faces higher DOA rates and bending issues, raising doubts about reliability. Lower-end units often lack thorough testing, making it hard to trust them for less powerful chips. For a 13600K, the VRM is adequate; for a 13900K, more power delivery is needed. If you need that, opt for the Elite AX, which offers better VRM and memory design, though Intel LAN has been reliable for you.
I
iTz_x_Joesephs
10-19-2022, 05:34 PM #7

Some options should work. If you prefer a stronger build, consider the CL32 or CL30 DDR5 6000 kits instead of the CL36 ones, though all are decent. Generally, RAM performs well and these kits should be acceptable. If prices match, the Kingston Fury kit is a solid choice due to its robust heat spreaders, even though overclocking isn’t necessary for most users. Two main concerns: ASUS’s recent quality control has been average at best. Notable problems include reverse-soldered capacitors on some Z690 boards that caused fires, and limited memory performance on certain Z690 Apex models despite their overclocking focus. The Z790 Apex faces higher DOA rates and bending issues, raising doubts about reliability. Lower-end units often lack thorough testing, making it hard to trust them for less powerful chips. For a 13600K, the VRM is adequate; for a 13900K, more power delivery is needed. If you need that, opt for the Elite AX, which offers better VRM and memory design, though Intel LAN has been reliable for you.

C
carp3
Senior Member
572
10-20-2022, 01:56 AM
#8
Great insights everyone! It’s interesting my friend recommended ASUS due to their reputation and advised against Gigabyte because of its poor standing. He’ll likely get some criticism if I switch the roles. RAM is sorted, but I’m open to exploring options outside the typical price range. If the LAN problems are resolved and the board list excludes Intel’s Ethernet, then it might not matter whether I use WiFi or not. However, since I plan to play online frequently, any significant connection risk would be a major concern. If it’s manageable, investing in a good premium board now makes sense given how crucial it is for this build.
C
carp3
10-20-2022, 01:56 AM #8

Great insights everyone! It’s interesting my friend recommended ASUS due to their reputation and advised against Gigabyte because of its poor standing. He’ll likely get some criticism if I switch the roles. RAM is sorted, but I’m open to exploring options outside the typical price range. If the LAN problems are resolved and the board list excludes Intel’s Ethernet, then it might not matter whether I use WiFi or not. However, since I plan to play online frequently, any significant connection risk would be a major concern. If it’s manageable, investing in a good premium board now makes sense given how crucial it is for this build.

T
towwl
Member
63
10-22-2022, 12:22 AM
#9
Are you certain the issue is resolved? I'm searching for updates or news about it, but so far I haven't found anything. This was the main reason I stayed within this price range; otherwise, I could find a better fit for this build.
T
towwl
10-22-2022, 12:22 AM #9

Are you certain the issue is resolved? I'm searching for updates or news about it, but so far I haven't found anything. This was the main reason I stayed within this price range; otherwise, I could find a better fit for this build.

C
chico111
Junior Member
2
10-22-2022, 12:43 AM
#10
I'm using AMD but the 64GB G.Skill F5-6000J3040G32GX2-TZ5N setup works well. I've only used it a bit, but it started Windows at 6400 MHz and kept the clock speed low (still around 3.5 GHz).
C
chico111
10-22-2022, 12:43 AM #10

I'm using AMD but the 64GB G.Skill F5-6000J3040G32GX2-TZ5N setup works well. I've only used it a bit, but it started Windows at 6400 MHz and kept the clock speed low (still around 3.5 GHz).

Pages (3): 1 2 3 Next