F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Looking for the best GPU/CPU pairing that stays under 100W?

Looking for the best GPU/CPU pairing that stays under 100W?

Looking for the best GPU/CPU pairing that stays under 100W?

L
live77
Member
194
01-23-2023, 11:01 AM
#1
I'm exploring how CPU/GPU, power use, and performance connect, especially in MOBILE NOTEBOOK DESIGN. Techniques such as undervolting can lower the power drawn by top processors significantly. I'm looking for performance versus power consumption data for CPUs, but not for GPUs. For GPUs, high-end chips still outperform low-end ones at the same power levels. For instance, limiting both a 4060 and 4080 to 60W means the 4080 will still surpass the 4060. If budget isn't an issue, choosing a higher performance model with a lower power limit—like capping the i7-13850HX at 45W—might be better. This is relevant when picking a laptop: I want something that stays cool enough for comfortable use, lasts decently on battery, and offers strong performance without excessive power use. The advantage of a high-end laptop is that it can run smoothly on a desk when unmodified, making it a viable desktop alternative.
L
live77
01-23-2023, 11:01 AM #1

I'm exploring how CPU/GPU, power use, and performance connect, especially in MOBILE NOTEBOOK DESIGN. Techniques such as undervolting can lower the power drawn by top processors significantly. I'm looking for performance versus power consumption data for CPUs, but not for GPUs. For GPUs, high-end chips still outperform low-end ones at the same power levels. For instance, limiting both a 4060 and 4080 to 60W means the 4080 will still surpass the 4060. If budget isn't an issue, choosing a higher performance model with a lower power limit—like capping the i7-13850HX at 45W—might be better. This is relevant when picking a laptop: I want something that stays cool enough for comfortable use, lasts decently on battery, and offers strong performance without excessive power use. The advantage of a high-end laptop is that it can run smoothly on a desk when unmodified, making it a viable desktop alternative.

J
jrobbs7
Member
235
01-23-2023, 11:53 AM
#2
The more core count you have, the better it is when running on low clock speeds and powering GPUs. GPUs rely heavily on parallel processing. On the CPU, though, you still want strong clock speeds for your critical threads, so this advantage is less pronounced. Still, higher-end components usually offer faster clocks, because lower-end models are often limited versions of the full chip. I recommend sticking with non-X and non-K parts. These tend to be more suitable for higher clock speeds while running at low power. Your unlocked chips are essentially the ones that don’t make it, as they leak a lot, allowing high clocks but sacrificing efficiency in terms of power and temperature.
J
jrobbs7
01-23-2023, 11:53 AM #2

The more core count you have, the better it is when running on low clock speeds and powering GPUs. GPUs rely heavily on parallel processing. On the CPU, though, you still want strong clock speeds for your critical threads, so this advantage is less pronounced. Still, higher-end components usually offer faster clocks, because lower-end models are often limited versions of the full chip. I recommend sticking with non-X and non-K parts. These tend to be more suitable for higher clock speeds while running at low power. Your unlocked chips are essentially the ones that don’t make it, as they leak a lot, allowing high clocks but sacrificing efficiency in terms of power and temperature.

W
117
01-23-2023, 05:16 PM
#3
If you grasp my input, the optimal option is to opt for a premium GPU while restricting power, yet use a CPU built for minimal energy consumption.
W
whitecastle200
01-23-2023, 05:16 PM #3

If you grasp my input, the optimal option is to opt for a premium GPU while restricting power, yet use a CPU built for minimal energy consumption.

S
SkyMaster280
Member
214
01-31-2023, 01:44 PM
#4
For the GPU, yes, that usually performs better. I’m not recommending low-power CPUs; instead, avoid overclockable ones. They can reach the desired speeds but at a greater thermal expense compared to regular high-power chips. H is acceptable, but not HX or HK. U class chips are built for significantly lower power consumption and typically run at slower clock rates to align with their design.
S
SkyMaster280
01-31-2023, 01:44 PM #4

For the GPU, yes, that usually performs better. I’m not recommending low-power CPUs; instead, avoid overclockable ones. They can reach the desired speeds but at a greater thermal expense compared to regular high-power chips. H is acceptable, but not HX or HK. U class chips are built for significantly lower power consumption and typically run at slower clock rates to align with their design.