Looking for a PC build that supports gaming and streaming with a budget under £1000?
Looking for a PC build that supports gaming and streaming with a budget under £1000?
Hello,
I’m planning to assemble a gaming PC using a Nvidia 3070TI, aiming for under £1000 with room to upgrade later. I also have a Nvidia M4000, which could be included if it benefits the build. The main goal is gaming and streaming, with some everyday tasks. It should be solid and offer top-tier performance. Apologies for any trouble, thank you.
Edit: I don’t need a keyboard, mouse, or monitor since I already have them. I also use GoXLR, so I’m curious about its impact on soundcard performance.
Thanks.
PCPartPicker Product Catalog
型号|商品|价格
:----|:----|:----
CPU|Intel Core i5-12600KF 3.7 GHz 10-Core Processor|£250.44 @ Technextday
CPU Cooler|Corsair iCUE H150i RGB PRO XT 75 CFM Liquid CPU Cooler|£98.99 @ AWD-IT
Motherboard|MSI PRO Z690-A WIFI DDR4 ATX LGA1700 Motherboard|£169.98 @ Amazon UK
Memory|Corsair Vengeance RGB Pro 32 GB (2 x 16 GB) DDR4-3600 CL18 Memory|£134.99 @ Amazon UK
Storage|Western Digital Black SN750 SE 1 TB M.2-2280 NVME SSD|£97.49 @ Amazon UK
Storage|Seagate SkyHawk 2 TB 3.5" 5900RPM Internal Hard Drive|£59.47 @ Ebuyer
Case|Corsair iCUE 4000X RGB ATX Mid Tower Case|£99.98 @ AWD-IT
Power Supply|Corsair RM (2019) 850 W 80+ Gold Certified Fully Modular ATX Power Supply|£99.98 @ Scan.co.uk
Total|£1011.32|Generated by PCPartPicker 2022-05-25 02:22 BST+0100
Some important points to keep in mind are that DDR4 Z690 MBs perform optimally with at least 4000 speed RAM, ideally around 4800, as higher speeds are becoming less common. Also, the minimum DDR4 standard for Z690 is 4800, so anything below that won't reach its full potential. Additionally, numerous reports mention WHEA errors leading to BSODs on Z690 MBs when the GPU is running at PCIe Gen 4. The only known solution so far is reverting to PCIe Gen 3, and it's unclear if a BIOS update will resolve this issue. Beyond that, using an effective air cooler such as the Scythe Fuma 2 will work well on a 12,600, particularly because it stays cooler than a 12,700 or 12,900. The choice ultimately depends on whether you plan to overclock.
You don't need quicker RAM right now because the DRDR5 cost isn't even reasonable, and boosting to 2133 MHz on Alder Lake won't make much of a difference. DDR4 models with speeds above 4000 MHz are readily available. Bandwidth isn't the only factor; tight timings can cause extra latency, which isn't ideal.
I think you might have been the one who gave your post a low score, as it appeared shortly before you posted. You didn’t mention the exact part of your comment that seemed incorrect, so I’ll focus on clarifying what parts of your argument aren’t quite right.
You suggest that having RAM with a speed as low as 2133 won’t have much impact. I might have misunderstood how difficult it is to locate a 4000 speed chip, but it’s not as if nearly double the RAM speed doesn’t improve performance, nor is the slower timing significantly reduced by a doubling of speed. There are only a few extra CPU cycles involved, which is a very small fraction compared to the benefit of doubling the speed.
Regarding whether 4000 speed RAM is still easy to find, it’s evident that the DDR4 standards for Z690 MBs begin at 4800 and go up. If you’re serious about getting the best performance from an Alder Lake setup, it makes sense to opt for 4800. Stop dismissing higher speed RAM as useless because of timing issues; it’s unreasonable, especially since you often downvote posts that present the facts clearly.
You just need to accept reality: upgrading to an Alder Lake setup is currently costly, unless you have very fast DDR4 chips, which many don’t have in their current systems. Previously, Intel CPUs handled 3200 well, so that’s a point to consider. I wasn’t entirely mistaken about the limited availability of 4000 speed RAM, but it’s not as clear-cut as you think. In fact, DDR4 4000 is actually difficult to find even in popular brands like Corsair.
Most see Alder Lake as a gaming upgrade for enthusiasts, and those who build such systems are very particular about component brands. They prioritize performance over cost, aiming to maximize the potential of their builds rather than settling for minimal gains.
The information available shows that faster RAM doesn't always guarantee better performance for the money right now. I didn't say faster RAM is useless, but given my current budget, it doesn't seem worth the investment. DDR4 at 4000MHz is quite accessible depending on your location, with models like 4133, 4266, and 4400 being common. If it's difficult to find, I wouldn't purchase it.
I'm currently using a 4133 C18 with precise timing settings, and I don't notice much difference in daily performance compared to my XMP configuration—except for raw speed and latency. On regular use, it probably won't be noticeable.
It's interesting when you mention "truth" while the facts are clear; you could watch some tech videos, and many experts would advise against DDR5 if you're on a tight budget. You might be able to help the person making this post improve their PC build compared to what I did.
It's mostly a matter of personal preference between what's available today and what you can get the best value from. DDR5 prices aren't cheap, but they're still evolving, so prices might drop if someone decides to upgrade. DDR4 starts at around 3200MHz, while DDR5 begins at 4800MHz—do you know what the starting point for DDR4 would be at 4800MHz?
He mentioned he'd upgrade, so as long as he has more funds available, shouldn't hesitate to consider DDR5. The speed of RAM isn't always the deciding factor for budget efficiency.
When searching for Corsair 4000 RAM it's hard to find it on places like Newegg, which isn't great availability. Jaytwocents often posts videos based on guesswork that end up being misleading. Linus isn't always accurate either. It's odd to praise certain people as "great techtubers" while claiming facts exist. That weakens your argument. Also, it's confusing how you mention starting out thinking 2133 RAM isn't much, then later saying you use 4133. I get why you like Jay and Linus, but mentioning Steve at Gamers Nexus would have shown more confidence in identifying good techtubers.