F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Looking for a 4000mhz RAM module with a dark hero board?

Looking for a 4000mhz RAM module with a dark hero board?

Looking for a 4000mhz RAM module with a dark hero board?

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
W
WindowshadeTS
Junior Member
41
12-04-2020, 09:50 AM
#1
Looking for others with a comparable build using 4x32 (PC4 32000) desktops running at 4000MHz on the same motherboard.
W
WindowshadeTS
12-04-2020, 09:50 AM #1

Looking for others with a comparable build using 4x32 (PC4 32000) desktops running at 4000MHz on the same motherboard.

S
SushiCherry
Member
227
12-04-2020, 04:26 PM
#2
Operating at 4000MHz with four RAM sticks creates instability because of the number of sticks. I’d prefer a lower frequency, around 3733MHz. I saw someone attempt the same on a forum and it didn’t work out.
S
SushiCherry
12-04-2020, 04:26 PM #2

Operating at 4000MHz with four RAM sticks creates instability because of the number of sticks. I’d prefer a lower frequency, around 3733MHz. I saw someone attempt the same on a forum and it didn’t work out.

J
Javabeanz
Member
84
12-05-2020, 06:49 PM
#3
At 4000mhz it performs worse compared to 3600mhz, where it matches the memory controller’s speed and achieves the best data flow rate.
J
Javabeanz
12-05-2020, 06:49 PM #3

At 4000mhz it performs worse compared to 3600mhz, where it matches the memory controller’s speed and achieves the best data flow rate.

S
sniperboy650
Senior Member
735
12-06-2020, 02:22 AM
#4
Good luck, buddy. I used 4x8 and it was quite challenging. The closest I got was 1900 with a 1:1 stable, and sometimes 1933, though it wasn't solid. My best result was 2100 with two sticks at a 1:1 ratio, but it wasn't stable. I managed stability at 2K. Let's try with two sticks and see how it goes.
S
sniperboy650
12-06-2020, 02:22 AM #4

Good luck, buddy. I used 4x8 and it was quite challenging. The closest I got was 1900 with a 1:1 stable, and sometimes 1933, though it wasn't solid. My best result was 2100 with two sticks at a 1:1 ratio, but it wasn't stable. I managed stability at 2K. Let's try with two sticks and see how it goes.

L
LtMeme
Junior Member
12
12-07-2020, 12:36 AM
#5
The numbers 1900 fclk and 3800 appear to be the top results I’m observing.
L
LtMeme
12-07-2020, 12:36 AM #5

The numbers 1900 fclk and 3800 appear to be the top results I’m observing.

K
kaaskotskikker
Posting Freak
795
12-09-2020, 07:36 PM
#6
This is some pretty expensive ram. I just posted this in hopes someone with the same dark hero board and similar ram would be like “oh yeah after updating bios my rig is loving these timings and fclk @ this ram etc lol
K
kaaskotskikker
12-09-2020, 07:36 PM #6

This is some pretty expensive ram. I just posted this in hopes someone with the same dark hero board and similar ram would be like “oh yeah after updating bios my rig is loving these timings and fclk @ this ram etc lol

C
CanaryRampage
Member
61
12-10-2020, 08:53 PM
#7
You're checking the information online. The optimal settings seem around 1900 fclk and 3800, while another person reported strong performance at 2000 fclk and 4000. It looks like stability is an issue, with few successful cases found so far.
C
CanaryRampage
12-10-2020, 08:53 PM #7

You're checking the information online. The optimal settings seem around 1900 fclk and 3800, while another person reported strong performance at 2000 fclk and 4000. It looks like stability is an issue, with few successful cases found so far.

A
AdarCool13
Junior Member
17
12-15-2020, 10:40 AM
#8
I hadn't noticed you were also checking the fclk. If you are doing that, maintain a 1:1 ratio for optimal performance—even small changes can affect your results. 2000 is a solid sample range, so aim to target 1900 and observe the outcome. Once you achieve a stable setup, progress in small steps will be more effective. It's quite fortunate you begin using fclk at that stage.
A
AdarCool13
12-15-2020, 10:40 AM #8

I hadn't noticed you were also checking the fclk. If you are doing that, maintain a 1:1 ratio for optimal performance—even small changes can affect your results. 2000 is a solid sample range, so aim to target 1900 and observe the outcome. Once you achieve a stable setup, progress in small steps will be more effective. It's quite fortunate you begin using fclk at that stage.

A
Atomic_Spray
Member
50
12-17-2020, 12:10 PM
#9
Golden sample area looks promising. It seems they might have the necessary resources to achieve this. I'm also testing my 5950x to ensure optimal single and multi-core performance. Hoping to find some high-quality components.
A
Atomic_Spray
12-17-2020, 12:10 PM #9

Golden sample area looks promising. It seems they might have the necessary resources to achieve this. I'm also testing my 5950x to ensure optimal single and multi-core performance. Hoping to find some high-quality components.

J
jjsoini
Posting Freak
809
12-23-2020, 05:04 PM
#10
You verified it all before launching, correct? At 5950x and 3600mhz memory, you established a reference point for performance. That helps ensure scores aren't misleading and performance stays stable.
J
jjsoini
12-23-2020, 05:04 PM #10

You verified it all before launching, correct? At 5950x and 3600mhz memory, you established a reference point for performance. That helps ensure scores aren't misleading and performance stays stable.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next