F5F Stay Refreshed Software Operating Systems Linux running on an Nvidia GPU?

Linux running on an Nvidia GPU?

Linux running on an Nvidia GPU?

Pages (2): Previous 1 2
N
NoNe_1
Member
188
12-27-2021, 07:01 AM
#11
I understand the situation between him and Nvidia. I recall around 2016 when I tried Linux with a GTX 980 card, using Ubuntu. After installing the drivers, the installation process failed and I faced a black screen upon restart. Recently, I began using Ubuntu again after switching from PopOS for about a month. I found Fedora to be a solid choice, but encountered issues downloading and installing programs due to compatibility problems with Debian-based systems. After trying Fedora, I returned to Ubuntu. Now I’m using AMD hardware and the experience remains positive so far. Programs that didn’t work on Fedora are functioning well on this distro.
N
NoNe_1
12-27-2021, 07:01 AM #11

I understand the situation between him and Nvidia. I recall around 2016 when I tried Linux with a GTX 980 card, using Ubuntu. After installing the drivers, the installation process failed and I faced a black screen upon restart. Recently, I began using Ubuntu again after switching from PopOS for about a month. I found Fedora to be a solid choice, but encountered issues downloading and installing programs due to compatibility problems with Debian-based systems. After trying Fedora, I returned to Ubuntu. Now I’m using AMD hardware and the experience remains positive so far. Programs that didn’t work on Fedora are functioning well on this distro.

_
_PREDA
Junior Member
10
12-28-2021, 02:12 PM
#12
In my scenarios Nvidia usually demands manual setup of config files or forcing the built-in graphics via BIOS or GRUB. Yet I favor Nvidia since it performs better. I haven’t explored Wayland yet as I don’t own any up-to-date systems.
_
_PREDA
12-28-2021, 02:12 PM #12

In my scenarios Nvidia usually demands manual setup of config files or forcing the built-in graphics via BIOS or GRUB. Yet I favor Nvidia since it performs better. I haven’t explored Wayland yet as I don’t own any up-to-date systems.

_
_DeathTrap_
Member
212
12-28-2021, 02:39 PM
#13
NVIDIA was once the top choice. Perhaps it still holds that position. The software updates have always been tricky, whether you were using WindowsNT or later versions on Debian—it didn’t really matter much. Still, it remains a hassle. However, unless someone is exceptionally skilled at managing NVIDIA.run files, it’s usually best to rely on drivers available in repositories. I found myself quite adept at installing the original proprietary drivers simply because that was necessary. Today, others with more Linux expertise suggest that .run files are the final resort for driver installation. Everyone’s approach is different, but I’d say go with what works. If you aim for smoother installations, consider distros beyond Ubuntu, as most seem to have issues with NVIDIA drivers. PCLinuxOS often gets overlooked. Also, keep in mind that the newest nVidia driver releases aren’t always reliable. Visit the official NVIDIA Driver Site, pick the original proprietary driver rather than the latest version, which may function correctly but not as well—or at all—compared to the older one. I experienced this with an old Dell D630 and graphics—told to use the 340.xx driver, but switching from 304.xx left me without graphics or poor performance. I returned to the earlier version. For legacy cards, you could try matching the driver number and checking versions in nVidia’s UNIX DRIVER ARCHIVE yourself to find the best fit. Have fun! Quitcherbellyachin' -- LOL
_
_DeathTrap_
12-28-2021, 02:39 PM #13

NVIDIA was once the top choice. Perhaps it still holds that position. The software updates have always been tricky, whether you were using WindowsNT or later versions on Debian—it didn’t really matter much. Still, it remains a hassle. However, unless someone is exceptionally skilled at managing NVIDIA.run files, it’s usually best to rely on drivers available in repositories. I found myself quite adept at installing the original proprietary drivers simply because that was necessary. Today, others with more Linux expertise suggest that .run files are the final resort for driver installation. Everyone’s approach is different, but I’d say go with what works. If you aim for smoother installations, consider distros beyond Ubuntu, as most seem to have issues with NVIDIA drivers. PCLinuxOS often gets overlooked. Also, keep in mind that the newest nVidia driver releases aren’t always reliable. Visit the official NVIDIA Driver Site, pick the original proprietary driver rather than the latest version, which may function correctly but not as well—or at all—compared to the older one. I experienced this with an old Dell D630 and graphics—told to use the 340.xx driver, but switching from 304.xx left me without graphics or poor performance. I returned to the earlier version. For legacy cards, you could try matching the driver number and checking versions in nVidia’s UNIX DRIVER ARCHIVE yourself to find the best fit. Have fun! Quitcherbellyachin' -- LOL

N
NaiROolF
Senior Member
685
12-28-2021, 06:52 PM
#14
To ensure smooth installation, I installed nvidia-detect using sudo. To avoid issues with library dependencies, I opted for apt or apt-get instead of more advanced tools. Many guides suggest handling a black screen by editing files with nano or vim. Since apt checks sources automatically, I didn’t need to manually verify checksums or GPG signatures when downloading runs or rpm files. This method also helps locate the correct driver for my graphics card using the nvidia-detect command.
N
NaiROolF
12-28-2021, 06:52 PM #14

To ensure smooth installation, I installed nvidia-detect using sudo. To avoid issues with library dependencies, I opted for apt or apt-get instead of more advanced tools. Many guides suggest handling a black screen by editing files with nano or vim. Since apt checks sources automatically, I didn’t need to manually verify checksums or GPG signatures when downloading runs or rpm files. This method also helps locate the correct driver for my graphics card using the nvidia-detect command.

1
10ukkie10
Member
180
12-29-2021, 07:16 AM
#15
The focus is on users wanting straightforward solutions and 'window-like' experiences, which often seem out of reach for companies like nVidia and their proprietary drivers. This trend may increase confusion as different Linux distributions create their own unique tools for installing these drivers. Each distro—whether Mint, Arch, or Debian—will likely develop its own method, making a unified approach even more challenging. In times of change and uncertainty, it makes sense to seek a shared standard. Personally, I’ve found that using the command line remains reliable, especially when other automated options fall short. It’s proven effective for selecting the right driver for modern GPUs, while legacy cards present different challenges.
1
10ukkie10
12-29-2021, 07:16 AM #15

The focus is on users wanting straightforward solutions and 'window-like' experiences, which often seem out of reach for companies like nVidia and their proprietary drivers. This trend may increase confusion as different Linux distributions create their own unique tools for installing these drivers. Each distro—whether Mint, Arch, or Debian—will likely develop its own method, making a unified approach even more challenging. In times of change and uncertainty, it makes sense to seek a shared standard. Personally, I’ve found that using the command line remains reliable, especially when other automated options fall short. It’s proven effective for selecting the right driver for modern GPUs, while legacy cards present different challenges.

Pages (2): Previous 1 2