Linux often feels frustrating for me.
Linux often feels frustrating for me.
Linus often mentions Manjaro, so I chose to try it out. To my surprise, they also provide KDE and Gnome options, which is impressive. My initial experience with Linux began with KDE, and I was pleased because it exceeded my preference for Gnome. I installed the version for my Ryzen 2500U laptop since it was only used occasionally—a good way to reintroduce myself to Linux.
At first, I faced several issues. The system wouldn't boot due to Secure Boot restrictions, and even USB booting failed because I had set it up with UNETBOOTIN, a tool I've relied on for nearly two decades. After using Rufus, I finally managed to get it running. Once operational, the interface looked satisfactory.
I proceeded with the installation. During setup, I was told there was no internet connection, which I accepted. Later, upon realizing the device had no drivers for Realtek Wi-Fi, I discovered a driver on Github. I had to install it manually via Terminal while connected to a wired network—something I had to do carefully.
Eventually, the system worked perfectly. This experience reminded me of the usual frustrations Linux users face. Compared to Windows, which handles drivers effortlessly, Linux often requires more technical know-how. Still, I appreciate tools like Clonezilla that function reliably. However, many distros lack proper support for essential components, making Linux feel less seamless.
I’ve spent the last two decades with Windows 10, which is straightforward and doesn’t demand complex commands. Linux, despite its strengths in specialized areas, still has reliability issues that deter me. I wish more distros could deliver consistent performance without these hurdles. People often complain about Windows’ inconsistencies, but trying different Linux distributions only deepens my appreciation for Windows’ simplicity.
I had to remove this from my system, but it was a necessary step.
Dealing with drivers on Linux feels frustrating for me. It's not like Windows where everything works out smoothly, but you'd think all those efforts would make it easier eventually. I'm still getting the hang of it myself, and that’s part of the challenge. So far, OS installs with Mint have been perfect—no major problems except needing to add drivers for certain files if I want to install them directly. Hopefully they'll improve, but it's still uncertain.
The operating system functions well when it does, and the distributions appear very appealing. Yet whenever something fails, it turns into a huge challenge. It always leads to Terminal sessions and endless lines of command-line instructions. Many claim this approach is simpler than navigating guides for menus, but with Windows, that just felt more intuitive and people adapted quickly. You rarely grasp long, seemingly pointless commands that are hard to remember, instead finding things in menus. In the end, I often give up because it becomes so frustrating. I really wish there was a chance one day to rely on a Linux distribution as my primary operating system. Unfortunately, I haven't had that opportunity in 20 years...
That's clear. Regardless of opinions, working on Linux usually means diving straight into the terminal. Trying to paste random commands hoping they'll work is risky—most attempts fail because of technical issues. It’s nearly impossible to get it right without deep expertise in hundreds of topics, each with thousands of variations, and even then it’s not reliable. You really need to understand the language and nuances to succeed.
Realtek struggles with their hardware on the most widely used desktop system. @RejZoR finds Linux disappointing 0/10. You don’t have to rely on it, seems you lack enthusiasm right from the start. It’s odd you’d make that comparison after dealing with Windows Update issues multiple times—each fix required confusing terminal commands without clear results. When problems arise, both OSes often need terminal help, but Linux offers a smoother experience for newcomers. The terminal on Linux is actually solid and avoids frustrating confusion for beginners. At least Linux tends to be more adaptable; Windows, by contrast, can feel rigid and unchangeable at times. Menus are available in all Linux distributions, which is why people prefer commands over endless screenshots: it’s consistent across versions and themes, and it speeds things up once you get the hang of it. It seems some users aren’t open to helping Linux when they face issues, sticking instead to the familiar Windows experience despite its flaws. You might gain a clearer view by asking a Mac user how they feel about Windows.
It seems software can now be set up with a single click. The issue lies with Linux users who enjoy crafting complex terminal commands, making it hard for others to simplify the process.
UNETBOOTIN is nearly 13 years old and doesn't allow the creation of Manjaro USB drives. (As you discovered) The claim that "it just works" regarding WiFi on Linux shows no understanding. WiFi functionality on Linux has consistently been poor. Only recently have improvements appeared. Realtek is often criticized for lacking timely support, if any.
Linux distributions truly embody that. You don’t have to search for installers online. It highlights the depth of your Linux expertise, showing how this feature has remained consistent since its creation and has been widely adopted by others—even though Windows lacks a similar functionality. Can I just express my frustration about Windows missing a maximize window option? Since we’re being honest, I’ll go ahead.
It functions perfectly as intended. No one mentioned WiFi in particular before. This aligns with what Linus discussed earlier. It's not something I've encountered since the start. @Sauron You're right about avoiding installers—just use the package manager to download everything? That sounds ideal. I just need a working internet connection... The chicken and the egg dilemma remains.
Linux centers around freedom, your decision. It offers the option to stay away from it entirely. Generally, this means skipping the desktop or laptop version. That’s acceptable. Now, explain the contrast: With Win-OS you typically set up a minimal system, search for drivers online, verify their safety, and then install them. Restart when prompted. Often with Linux you start with a basic setup, use the package manager to add verified drivers, reboot once if needed, and it works right away. From the start, Win-OS supports very few hardware options. Linux usually does, as most drivers are built into the kernel or available through the package manager. Even if you push Linux’s limits, it won’t disappear or improve itself automatically. Linux thrives on community contributors—volunteers who dedicate their time to enhance code, add features, and test updates before they reach regular users. Your choice matters, but those developers deserve recognition beyond just casual praise for Win-OS fans.