Linux Mint / LMDE vs. Arch

marcusq
Junior Member

08-26-2016, 02:12 AM

I plan to try Linux this weekend for a lighter, more customizable setup. I’m looking for something efficient without heavy overhead. WS is an option, but I prefer Arch because of its minimal footprint, though I’m open to Mint if it feels more approachable.

marcusq

08-26-2016, 02:12 AM #1

Adabelle
Senior Member

724

08-27-2016, 01:17 PM

Avoid setting up a lot of time if you prefer, then skip Arch. Linux Mint is a solid choice—used it for a long time. I’ve switched to Fedora now.

Adabelle

08-27-2016, 01:17 PM #2

Avoid setting up a lot of time if you prefer, then skip Arch. Linux Mint is a solid choice—used it for a long time. I’ve switched to Fedora now.

avi15
Member

167

08-28-2016, 05:26 PM

LMDE?

avi15

08-28-2016, 05:26 PM #3

LMDE?

TheMoltenGuy
Junior Member

08-29-2016, 05:21 AM

I haven’t tried LMDE before; I used the standard Mint instead. It seems fine. The smaller user base is unclear, but if you prefer extra caution, stick with the regular version. If you’re curious, give it a try and let me know your thoughts.

TheMoltenGuy

08-29-2016, 05:21 AM #4

BriMinecrafter
Junior Member

08-29-2016, 02:04 PM

Mint is a great choice if you prefer minimal setup. It’s straightforward because it’s based on Ubuntu, making it very user-friendly.

BriMinecrafter

08-29-2016, 02:04 PM #5

Mint is a great choice if you prefer minimal setup. It’s straightforward because it’s based on Ubuntu, making it very user-friendly.

Inside
Junior Member

09-06-2016, 11:30 AM

Consider Manjaro as a middle ground between Mint and Arch. It runs on Arch's foundation, yet simplifies installation. Packages are delayed two weeks for additional testing.

Inside

09-06-2016, 11:30 AM #6

Consider Manjaro as a middle ground between Mint and Arch. It runs on Arch's foundation, yet simplifies installation. Packages are delayed two weeks for additional testing.