Linux can be faster depending on the use case and system configuration.
Linux can be faster depending on the use case and system configuration.
Generally speaking yes, you'll observe that GNU/Linux feels noticeably faster than Windows—especially when using KDE, which is likely the most resource-intensive desktop environment. It handles system resources more efficiently and effectively. On Arch Linux I currently manage around 30 open tabs in Firefox, Steam, terminal windows, file managers, and MPV playback, while keeping RAM usage below 2GB. The exact impact depends on the window manager or desktop environment you select. Running a lightweight WM with custom apps tends to use fewer system resources compared to installing a full DE. In gaming, poor ports combined with mediocre drivers usually favor Windows, though exceptions exist. Edit: The video thumbnail didn't load for me but I'm in agreement with others. Looking at OS today versus 2003 feels somewhat skewed.
Just gonna throw Arch Linux into the distro debate here. It's super simple and lightweight once you get it set up. You only get what you put in it. Also Pacman is the best package manager I've ever used and the AUR is amazing.
Linux runs more efficiently because it lacks the heavy packages typical in Windows and can run on minimal desktop setups rather than being limited by Microsoft’s choices. Adding extra software often slows things down, but you can achieve similar speed by installing only what you need. Avoiding constant update checks also helps maintain performance.