Linus tackled a Linux challenge.
Linus tackled a Linux challenge.
Lately i have seen a lote of LMG Clips about Linus his Linus challenge and it's a kind of torcher to let us wait till the te real serie is comming online. thill then here is a list of clips that you can watch for you amusement: My first thoughts on Installing Linux Rules for our Linux challenge I'm learning a lot about the Linux Community... Gaming on Linux has been... interesting... Did Linus CHEAT during the Linux challenge?? I have NOT had a stable Linux experience My kids HATE the Linux challenge Should Linux be more user friendly? My reaction to this video whould be: It's realy a torture to wait the searies are comming online, I can't wait and i think it will be realy fun. What are you thoughts on the teasers? And the series? Please discuss them here. Edit: Part one: Linux HATES Me – Daily Driver CHALLENGE Pt.1 and Should you stick to Windows for gaming?
I believe they’re about to uncover what I’ve been discussing about Linux for years. The main issue isn’t the system itself, but the people and community that restrict its accessibility for everyone. They don’t want Linux to gain widespread popularity, so it remains limited.
I don't think that's a fair assessment. There are certainly elitist people who don't want Linux to become mainstream, but I doubt most of them are in a position to actively prevent it. The reality is far more simple. Linux has no overarching goal, design philosophy or command structure like a company does. Since it is open source, anyone can work on or contribute to whatever they like. And writing documentation is not exactly the thing developers like to do. Designing a good and intuitive UI is also not the easiest job in the world, especially if you don't have the budget to test things with focus groups etc. Add to the mix that a lot of companies don't exactly want to contribute when it comes to Linux support of their software or drivers. Of course driver development isn't made easier by the fact that the kernel developers are unwilling to commit to a stable driver ABI. So there's a lot of reverse engineering going on, on whatever hardware people have handy and are willing to experiment on. There are certainly professional Linux developers how are in a paid position. But those mostly work for companies doing development for servers, so gaming and desktop users aren't their primary goal either.
All the comments indicate that user experience isn't being emphasized since most work happens during professional hours. Leisure activities like gaming aren't seen as important priorities. I can relate to that perspective. Hopefully, soon some refined usability features will emerge from both professionals and home users. Perhaps Linus will begin bringing his ideas to life, while others and I won't be left out.
A helpful comparison is similar to driving with mechanical issues. You can choose one of three paths: 1) Hire a service to repair it, 2) Try to fix it yourself, or 3) Count on someone kind enough to stop by and assist you. This mirrors what happens with your computer. If you're paying for the operating system—like Windows or macOS, which are like brand-new cars—you want it to run smoothly (otherwise why invest in it?). Otherwise, you might seek support from others. But if you dislike their options (price, privacy, ethics, etc.), they likely dominate the market because they profit from your data and have limited choice. The alternatives are usually Linux, BSD, or other less mainstream choices, each with its own strengths and weaknesses compared to Windows or macOS.
If you're not paying and didn't build it yourself, it's like having a car built by someone else who assembles it from spare parts (a small, niche distribution). It's thoughtful, but they have no duty to help. Since they designed it, they understand how to use it, yet it often takes extra effort and resources to make it user-friendly. Mainstream distros backed by big companies can offer free use but provide paid support, focusing on features their biggest customers want. System76 shines because it prioritizes users and has improved its interface significantly, though it lacks the backing of giants like Microsoft.
For those who criticize Linux's fragmentation, it's similar to other operating systems—why do we have so many options? The reason is that open source allows anyone to contribute, making it more adaptable. Linux stands out because it's easier to start with and customize compared to Windows or macOS. If you're working independently, your goals will shape what you choose—whether learning, solving a specific need, or seeking recognition.
Companies sometimes adopt Ubuntu for example, but they tailor it with their own changes. Pop uses Ubuntu with personal touches. However, System76 is more focused on user experience, though it lacks the resources of larger players. Valve has shown interest in improving this direction, especially with the Steam Deck.
For those who complain about Linux's diversity, it reflects a broader trend: why do we have so many competing systems? The answer lies in accessibility and community involvement. More open source means more options, and while Windows and macOS dominate due to their scale, Linux offers flexibility and growing support for users who value control and customization.
Eh? What do you mean by "the people/community"? Did you mix up being indifferent about popularity (agnostic) with actively disliking popular ideas or things (haters of the concept)? Those Linux versions targeting mass appeal, like AOSP—the world’s most used OS—have really taken off. Most Linux distributions focus on different goals; for instance, Arch Linux prioritizes seamless interoperability by sidestepping distribution-specific updates, and it has achieved great success in that area. It's not that the people behind Arch Linux don’t care about popularity—it’s just that keeping things compatible is more important to them. Think about the Catholic Church expanding into the Middle East: would you criticize them for sticking to their traditional views instead of adapting to local customs? Or do you think they should change to fit local beliefs in order to gain more acceptance? It’s interesting that there are still individuals who stand firm on their convictions rather than chasing popularity.
A few statements taken out of context aren't strong enough to support my view. The original argument centers on Linux's lack of popularity stemming from deliberate efforts to discourage adoption, which seems questionable. It comes across as dismissive toward anyone who supports the platform.
You can find distro reviews at https://www.dedoimedo.com/ and notice recurring issues for users. Problems often arise, such as functionality failures or appearance defects, and there’s no clear timeline for fixing them in upcoming updates. After several fresh installs, I encountered new complications like XFCE freezing during login manager access. Some distros address this by defaulting to a generic driver or recommending manual fixes, while others require manual KDE package installation due to missing dependencies and incomplete UI icons. As far as I know, Linus is using Manjaro, where the installer struggles with EFI partitions and prompts users to handle partition copying instead of auto-solving it like on Ubuntu or Windows.
The two statements convey distinct meanings. One focuses on missing opportunities to boost popularity by not prioritizing features, while the other implies intentional design choices to hinder adoption. The second is considered a serious claim or conspiracy theory.