F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Less cores at higher speeds is preferable.

Less cores at higher speeds is preferable.

Less cores at higher speeds is preferable.

R
Royalsalt
Junior Member
16
02-24-2016, 06:55 AM
#1
I'm currently stuck with the FX 6300 and limited by my GTX 1060. I managed to hit a stable 4.6 GHZ overclock by turning off "cores" 5-6, and I've maintained a consistent 4.2GHZ across all cores. For gaming, it really depends on the title, but in general, what works best?
R
Royalsalt
02-24-2016, 06:55 AM #1

I'm currently stuck with the FX 6300 and limited by my GTX 1060. I managed to hit a stable 4.6 GHZ overclock by turning off "cores" 5-6, and I've maintained a consistent 4.2GHZ across all cores. For gaming, it really depends on the title, but in general, what works best?

N
Nydoak
Junior Member
2
02-24-2016, 08:18 AM
#2
When playing games, performance is usually measured by how well it handles multiple cores. Even with an outdated and weak chip like the FX6300, it won't make a big difference in the long term.
N
Nydoak
02-24-2016, 08:18 AM #2

When playing games, performance is usually measured by how well it handles multiple cores. Even with an outdated and weak chip like the FX6300, it won't make a big difference in the long term.

G
ghall2499
Member
62
02-24-2016, 08:24 AM
#3
Current titles perform better with additional processing units. Speed remains important, but modern games increasingly rely on multiple threads. Classic titles work well with fewer processing units and stronger single-thread performance.
G
ghall2499
02-24-2016, 08:24 AM #3

Current titles perform better with additional processing units. Speed remains important, but modern games increasingly rely on multiple threads. Classic titles work well with fewer processing units and stronger single-thread performance.

S
SGgamingDK
Member
222
02-24-2016, 09:16 AM
#4
Typically, games work best on fewer, quicker processors. Four cores remains a solid range for gaming, especially as some top-tier titles begin to take advantage of them.
S
SGgamingDK
02-24-2016, 09:16 AM #4

Typically, games work best on fewer, quicker processors. Four cores remains a solid range for gaming, especially as some top-tier titles begin to take advantage of them.

K
KaisSou
Member
52
02-25-2016, 12:52 AM
#5
Turn off cores 5-6 and revert to your 4.6GHz setting.
K
KaisSou
02-25-2016, 12:52 AM #5

Turn off cores 5-6 and revert to your 4.6GHz setting.

E
ExtasyFox
Member
177
03-03-2016, 10:09 AM
#6
It won't be a big deal about the FX. Some games will appreciate the extra cores, while others will prefer faster performance.
E
ExtasyFox
03-03-2016, 10:09 AM #6

It won't be a big deal about the FX. Some games will appreciate the extra cores, while others will prefer faster performance.

R
140
03-10-2016, 05:07 PM
#7
You won’t really get any advantage. The greatest improvement comes from leaving that outdated system behind—it’s not worth it anymore.
R
RabbitKiller99
03-10-2016, 05:07 PM #7

You won’t really get any advantage. The greatest improvement comes from leaving that outdated system behind—it’s not worth it anymore.

J
jerrydog01
Senior Member
703
03-11-2016, 01:50 PM
#8
I'm really stuck here, honestly. Once I gather all the cash, I'm leaving this site. I managed to get a deal with a friend—he's sending me an i7 6700k and a motherboard. Had to ask a few people for help. Now I just need to rack up some RAM.
J
jerrydog01
03-11-2016, 01:50 PM #8

I'm really stuck here, honestly. Once I gather all the cash, I'm leaving this site. I managed to get a deal with a friend—he's sending me an i7 6700k and a motherboard. Had to ask a few people for help. Now I just need to rack up some RAM.

S
snaari
Member
70
03-12-2016, 06:11 PM
#9
For how much the 6700k and the mobo?
S
snaari
03-12-2016, 06:11 PM #9

For how much the 6700k and the mobo?

T
Twanneman81
Member
92
03-14-2016, 03:26 PM
#10
Keep it under $150 for the entire package.
T
Twanneman81
03-14-2016, 03:26 PM #10

Keep it under $150 for the entire package.