Leaks in 9000X3D and Cinebench R23 results
Leaks in 9000X3D and Cinebench R23 results
The discussion highlights recent findings and comparisons regarding gaming performance on different Ryzen models. Several players shared their experiences and scores using benchmark tools like Cinebench R23. The results suggest that the 9000X3D variant shows slight improvements across most titles, though some games remain consistently strong. Users note that while the scores don’t always reflect real-world speed, they provide useful insights for optimizing systems. For more accurate data, it’s recommended to refer to official MSI reports or detailed community analyses.
We need to wait for reviews because this information doesn’t give us much. BMW should be able to maintain high performance above 60FPS before hitting the CPU limit with my 5800X3D (without RT), which suggests they’ve pushed both hardware limits. RT seems to be more of a GPU benchmark, even though it can be CPU-intensive in many titles; BMW usually handles the 4090 well, so around 60FPS is a CPU constraint rather than a CPU bottleneck. I checked SOTTR results and they align with maxed settings using RT, which leans more toward GPU limits instead of CPU. I haven’t tested FC6 since I’m unfamiliar with those games, but I know players favor X3D, so it’s possible these titles are heavier on the CPU as well. Without knowing the exact settings, I can’t tell if the tests focused more on GPU or CPU performance.
Being constrained by the GPU doesn’t significantly affect the CPU performance comparison, especially when AMD GPUs run better under such conditions.
Yes, the CPU responds quicker after finishing its wait state, which often stands out. 4K scores differ in speed, and they tend to show a comparable or nearly identical gap versus 1080p.