F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Laser or LED printer

Laser or LED printer

Laser or LED printer

C
Chester007
Senior Member
528
09-26-2016, 03:57 AM
#1
I’m considering purchasing a single-color laser printer for our home business. After some research, I’ve identified two options: the Brother MFC-L8900CDW and the MFC-L3780CDW. I notice a key distinction between them is that the 8900 uses real laser technology, whereas the 3780 relies on LED technology. From what I understand, LED printers tend to have fewer moving parts, which might suggest greater reliability and lower long-term maintenance needs. Additionally, actual laser printers are often perceived as delivering superior print quality. In my situation, quality isn’t my main concern, but I still want something that looks good. Since I won’t be printing a lot of images, I’m weighing the pros and cons of each model.

Between these two, what factors would make one preferable over the other—especially if it’s an LED or laser printer?

Don’t go overprinting much. Occasionally, during certain times of the year, usage might be limited, and most people wouldn’t think it’s heavy printing. There could be periods where no printing occurs at all, which is why I’m considering a laser printer despite currently using an inkjet. One reason I’m leaning toward the 8900 is the lower cost of toner compared to the 3780. Although the 8900 is slightly more expensive upfront, the cheaper toner can be more economical in the long run, and it also prints more than the 3780 model.
C
Chester007
09-26-2016, 03:57 AM #1

I’m considering purchasing a single-color laser printer for our home business. After some research, I’ve identified two options: the Brother MFC-L8900CDW and the MFC-L3780CDW. I notice a key distinction between them is that the 8900 uses real laser technology, whereas the 3780 relies on LED technology. From what I understand, LED printers tend to have fewer moving parts, which might suggest greater reliability and lower long-term maintenance needs. Additionally, actual laser printers are often perceived as delivering superior print quality. In my situation, quality isn’t my main concern, but I still want something that looks good. Since I won’t be printing a lot of images, I’m weighing the pros and cons of each model.

Between these two, what factors would make one preferable over the other—especially if it’s an LED or laser printer?

Don’t go overprinting much. Occasionally, during certain times of the year, usage might be limited, and most people wouldn’t think it’s heavy printing. There could be periods where no printing occurs at all, which is why I’m considering a laser printer despite currently using an inkjet. One reason I’m leaning toward the 8900 is the lower cost of toner compared to the 3780. Although the 8900 is slightly more expensive upfront, the cheaper toner can be more economical in the long run, and it also prints more than the 3780 model.

A
AndresPlay
Junior Member
5
10-01-2016, 11:49 PM
#2
8900 offers a faster print speed with around 30 pages per minute, though it comes at a higher cost and handles images better. 3780 provides a lower price, slower printing at about 20 pages per minute, with image quality that is only acceptable in some cases.
A
AndresPlay
10-01-2016, 11:49 PM #2

8900 offers a faster print speed with around 30 pages per minute, though it comes at a higher cost and handles images better. 3780 provides a lower price, slower printing at about 20 pages per minute, with image quality that is only acceptable in some cases.

I
iTsDawa
Junior Member
12
10-02-2016, 04:40 AM
#3
I own a Brother HL-L3290CDW printer equipped with LED illumination for the xerographic process. Previously, I used a Lexmark 4-colour laser printer. I haven’t noticed a significant variation in print quality between the two technologies. As you mentioned, the LED array design is simpler mechanically compared to the laser system that requires scanning a single beam. Among the two Brother models you mentioned, both maintain the same native resolution of 600 dpi (without any enhancement).

One point that stands out is the discrepancy in document glass dimensions. One source states 8½ x 11, while another specifies 8½ x 14. The 8900 model’s specifications differ from this, with a wider top edge visible in photos, suggesting the legal size is accurate. Of course, if you’re feeding documents through a feeder during scanning, this detail becomes irrelevant.

Concerning toner expenses, it’s important to note the differences. Each printer supports three cart capacities—Standard, High Yield, and Super High Yield. The terminology varies, but focusing on High Yield, the TN433 cart for the 8900 model offers yields of 4500 (B) or 4000 (CMY) pages. For the 3780 model, the comparable cart is the TN229XL, rated at 3000 (B) or 2300 (CMY) pages. Comparing these requires per-page calculations, as actual yield will differ slightly.

I have never purchased OEM toner cartridges. Instead, I’ve used third-party options from Moustache in Canada, which I’m satisfied with. For this analysis, I’ll use current Canadian pricing for accuracy. Based on my data, a full set of four TN433 High Yield carts for the 8900 model costs around C$180, providing 4500–4000 pages—approximately C$45 per 1000 pages. For the 3780 model, the TN229XL cart set is C$260 or C$113 per 1000 pages. Please note that the latter includes a chip for compatibility, which ensures proper operation without manual adjustments.

However, I haven’t bought these cartridges myself. My calculations are based on third-party sources in Canada. Using genuine Brother cartridges from the same seller, the costs change: the TN433 High Yield set for the 8900 model is C$733 (or C$183 per 1000 pages), and the TN229XL for the 3780 model is C$523 (C$227 per 1000 pages). Keep in mind that the latter includes a chip, making it compatible without issues.

To prevent third-party complications, I’ve recalculated using real Brother cartridges from the same online vendor. For the 8900, four TN433 High Yield carts total C$733 (or C$183 per 1000 pages). For the 3780, four TN229XL carts amount to C$523 (C$227 per 1000 pages). It’s worth noting that while this option is more expensive upfront, it may offer better long-term value due to lower toner consumption.

Additionally, regarding printer drivers and settings, my Brother printer (and its predecessor) allows customization via Windows settings. You can configure it to print only in Black when no color is present, avoiding unnecessary use of multi-colour toners. My system also includes tools to save document profiles—such as single- or double-sided printing in various formats and sizes.

Lastly, the seller offers sets of five toner cartridges, including three colors plus two Blacks, which can help manage costs over time since Black ink tends to deplete faster. This approach may reduce the need for frequent purchases compared to buying separate packs.
I
iTsDawa
10-02-2016, 04:40 AM #3

I own a Brother HL-L3290CDW printer equipped with LED illumination for the xerographic process. Previously, I used a Lexmark 4-colour laser printer. I haven’t noticed a significant variation in print quality between the two technologies. As you mentioned, the LED array design is simpler mechanically compared to the laser system that requires scanning a single beam. Among the two Brother models you mentioned, both maintain the same native resolution of 600 dpi (without any enhancement).

One point that stands out is the discrepancy in document glass dimensions. One source states 8½ x 11, while another specifies 8½ x 14. The 8900 model’s specifications differ from this, with a wider top edge visible in photos, suggesting the legal size is accurate. Of course, if you’re feeding documents through a feeder during scanning, this detail becomes irrelevant.

Concerning toner expenses, it’s important to note the differences. Each printer supports three cart capacities—Standard, High Yield, and Super High Yield. The terminology varies, but focusing on High Yield, the TN433 cart for the 8900 model offers yields of 4500 (B) or 4000 (CMY) pages. For the 3780 model, the comparable cart is the TN229XL, rated at 3000 (B) or 2300 (CMY) pages. Comparing these requires per-page calculations, as actual yield will differ slightly.

I have never purchased OEM toner cartridges. Instead, I’ve used third-party options from Moustache in Canada, which I’m satisfied with. For this analysis, I’ll use current Canadian pricing for accuracy. Based on my data, a full set of four TN433 High Yield carts for the 8900 model costs around C$180, providing 4500–4000 pages—approximately C$45 per 1000 pages. For the 3780 model, the TN229XL cart set is C$260 or C$113 per 1000 pages. Please note that the latter includes a chip for compatibility, which ensures proper operation without manual adjustments.

However, I haven’t bought these cartridges myself. My calculations are based on third-party sources in Canada. Using genuine Brother cartridges from the same seller, the costs change: the TN433 High Yield set for the 8900 model is C$733 (or C$183 per 1000 pages), and the TN229XL for the 3780 model is C$523 (C$227 per 1000 pages). Keep in mind that the latter includes a chip, making it compatible without issues.

To prevent third-party complications, I’ve recalculated using real Brother cartridges from the same online vendor. For the 8900, four TN433 High Yield carts total C$733 (or C$183 per 1000 pages). For the 3780, four TN229XL carts amount to C$523 (C$227 per 1000 pages). It’s worth noting that while this option is more expensive upfront, it may offer better long-term value due to lower toner consumption.

Additionally, regarding printer drivers and settings, my Brother printer (and its predecessor) allows customization via Windows settings. You can configure it to print only in Black when no color is present, avoiding unnecessary use of multi-colour toners. My system also includes tools to save document profiles—such as single- or double-sided printing in various formats and sizes.

Lastly, the seller offers sets of five toner cartridges, including three colors plus two Blacks, which can help manage costs over time since Black ink tends to deplete faster. This approach may reduce the need for frequent purchases compared to buying separate packs.