F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop La Core i9-9900K est sortie en 2022, offrant des performances élevées pour les tâches exigeantes.

La Core i9-9900K est sortie en 2022, offrant des performances élevées pour les tâches exigeantes.

La Core i9-9900K est sortie en 2022, offrant des performances élevées pour les tâches exigeantes.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
M
57
10-12-2018, 08:38 PM
#1
I've been weighing whether to upgrade my CPU. I recently got 32GB of DDR4 memory, but my Core i5-9400F only handles 2400Mhz. That’s not the main problem. The RAM was on sale, so I decided to replace it. My concern is that my Core i5-9400F might be limiting my GPU performance—specifically the EVGA nVidia GeForce GTX 1660Ti with 6GB. I’m confused because a 6-core CPU shouldn’t restrict anything. I’m looking for a budget-friendly option, and I’ve seen Core i9 models priced around $300 on eBay. I’m considering the 10th or 11th gen, but my setup is a bit outdated. I own a second-hand NZXT 240mm AIO, which means I lack proper mounting points and other accessories. I wasn’t sure if this was the issue, but now it seems possible.

I’m also thinking about whether the Core i9-9900K would work well with my setup. I want something affordable and plan to upgrade my GPU later. I’m worried that even if the CPU isn’t the bottleneck, it could still cause problems down the line. The main game I play is FiveM on GTA V, which has many add-ons and can strain resources. My monitor is 4K, but I noticed performance drops when using it at higher resolutions—my CPU and RAM would hit limits even with a 1080P screen. I had issues before too, especially with POSTFX and Shader Quality, but now they’re stable.

I’ve tried various fixes: updating BIOS, checking for conflicts, and ensuring no background processes are hogging resources. All graphics except POSTFX and Shader Quality are running normally. The CPU and RAM usage stay within limits, even at 1440P. I suspect the bottleneck might actually be my GPU or the mods/add-ons, not the CPU. I’m open to advice from others who’ve dealt with similar setups.

If you have any insights, I’d appreciate it! I’m also a content creator, so I use Sony Vegas Pro and OBS Studio for editing and streaming. Sometimes long sessions can push my system to its limits. I’ve updated everything and still face challenges. If anyone has tips or experiences, please share!
M
MatheusSUICIDA
10-12-2018, 08:38 PM #1

I've been weighing whether to upgrade my CPU. I recently got 32GB of DDR4 memory, but my Core i5-9400F only handles 2400Mhz. That’s not the main problem. The RAM was on sale, so I decided to replace it. My concern is that my Core i5-9400F might be limiting my GPU performance—specifically the EVGA nVidia GeForce GTX 1660Ti with 6GB. I’m confused because a 6-core CPU shouldn’t restrict anything. I’m looking for a budget-friendly option, and I’ve seen Core i9 models priced around $300 on eBay. I’m considering the 10th or 11th gen, but my setup is a bit outdated. I own a second-hand NZXT 240mm AIO, which means I lack proper mounting points and other accessories. I wasn’t sure if this was the issue, but now it seems possible.

I’m also thinking about whether the Core i9-9900K would work well with my setup. I want something affordable and plan to upgrade my GPU later. I’m worried that even if the CPU isn’t the bottleneck, it could still cause problems down the line. The main game I play is FiveM on GTA V, which has many add-ons and can strain resources. My monitor is 4K, but I noticed performance drops when using it at higher resolutions—my CPU and RAM would hit limits even with a 1080P screen. I had issues before too, especially with POSTFX and Shader Quality, but now they’re stable.

I’ve tried various fixes: updating BIOS, checking for conflicts, and ensuring no background processes are hogging resources. All graphics except POSTFX and Shader Quality are running normally. The CPU and RAM usage stay within limits, even at 1440P. I suspect the bottleneck might actually be my GPU or the mods/add-ons, not the CPU. I’m open to advice from others who’ve dealt with similar setups.

If you have any insights, I’d appreciate it! I’m also a content creator, so I use Sony Vegas Pro and OBS Studio for editing and streaming. Sometimes long sessions can push my system to its limits. I’ve updated everything and still face challenges. If anyone has tips or experiences, please share!

A
Allpaca
Member
159
10-13-2018, 04:38 AM
#2
The 12400F is significantly quicker. You can purchase a board and CPU together for around $300 new. It includes a compatible cooler, and you can add an AIO mounting mechanism for LGA 1700 if needed, costing roughly $10.
A
Allpaca
10-13-2018, 04:38 AM #2

The 12400F is significantly quicker. You can purchase a board and CPU together for around $300 new. It includes a compatible cooler, and you can add an AIO mounting mechanism for LGA 1700 if needed, costing roughly $10.

U
UghItzEliza
Junior Member
21
10-14-2018, 01:10 AM
#3
You're right to question it. A 6-core processor isn't enough for your needs, and upgrading to at least 8 cores could make a big difference.
U
UghItzEliza
10-14-2018, 01:10 AM #3

You're right to question it. A 6-core processor isn't enough for your needs, and upgrading to at least 8 cores could make a big difference.

G
Gustavgurra03
Posting Freak
815
10-28-2018, 08:27 PM
#4
Consider overall multi-core efficiency beyond just thread count. Thread count only counts if you're using virtualization; otherwise, single-core and multi-core results are more important. The 12400F shows strong both, with a slight edge over the 9900K in single-thread speed—about 20% faster. In multi-thread scenarios it performs similarly to the 9900K but up to 20% quicker, though this depends on your VRM quality. Performance may drop further if power throttling occurs due to weak VRM, potentially making it worse than the 12400F.
G
Gustavgurra03
10-28-2018, 08:27 PM #4

Consider overall multi-core efficiency beyond just thread count. Thread count only counts if you're using virtualization; otherwise, single-core and multi-core results are more important. The 12400F shows strong both, with a slight edge over the 9900K in single-thread speed—about 20% faster. In multi-thread scenarios it performs similarly to the 9900K but up to 20% quicker, though this depends on your VRM quality. Performance may drop further if power throttling occurs due to weak VRM, potentially making it worse than the 12400F.

M
mika1245
Member
69
10-29-2018, 07:30 AM
#5
I understand, that wasn't something I initially considered. If I upgrade to the 12th generation, I could easily switch to a better CPU later if needed. I wouldn't even need to replace the board unless Intel introduces the 13th generation CPUs. XD Thanks for your input! You might have helped me avoid some trouble. I checked the compatibility and confirmed it works, though I've noticed some issues with the B365M boards when paired with i9 chips. I'll look into more options and see what others recommend. Probably choosing a 12th generation i5 will be better, thanks!
M
mika1245
10-29-2018, 07:30 AM #5

I understand, that wasn't something I initially considered. If I upgrade to the 12th generation, I could easily switch to a better CPU later if needed. I wouldn't even need to replace the board unless Intel introduces the 13th generation CPUs. XD Thanks for your input! You might have helped me avoid some trouble. I checked the compatibility and confirmed it works, though I've noticed some issues with the B365M boards when paired with i9 chips. I'll look into more options and see what others recommend. Probably choosing a 12th generation i5 will be better, thanks!

M
macmacoo
Member
193
10-31-2018, 02:42 AM
#6
13th generation models are confirmed compatible with LGA 1700. Both ASRock and ASUS have already issued BIOS updates for their boards ahead of launch, and I anticipate MSI and Gigabyte will follow shortly. You won’t need to replace the board, even for those chips. The VRM on the B660M-A Pro is exceptionally strong, so you shouldn’t worry about throttling with an i7 or possibly an i9 if your case provides adequate airflow.
M
macmacoo
10-31-2018, 02:42 AM #6

13th generation models are confirmed compatible with LGA 1700. Both ASRock and ASUS have already issued BIOS updates for their boards ahead of launch, and I anticipate MSI and Gigabyte will follow shortly. You won’t need to replace the board, even for those chips. The VRM on the B660M-A Pro is exceptionally strong, so you shouldn’t worry about throttling with an i7 or possibly an i9 if your case provides adequate airflow.

J
jabbathehutt99
Junior Member
5
11-07-2018, 12:48 PM
#7
You have a 6-core, 6-thread processor. The 9900K isn't a better choice for gaming compared to a 12400F. While it has a bit more threads, it won't justify the price difference on eBay when you're essentially buying a nearly new 9900K. A newer platform offers greater upgrade options, so future upgrades will likely require more CPUs in the used market. The only relevant options for your socket are the I7 8700 or i9 9900.
J
jabbathehutt99
11-07-2018, 12:48 PM #7

You have a 6-core, 6-thread processor. The 9900K isn't a better choice for gaming compared to a 12400F. While it has a bit more threads, it won't justify the price difference on eBay when you're essentially buying a nearly new 9900K. A newer platform offers greater upgrade options, so future upgrades will likely require more CPUs in the used market. The only relevant options for your socket are the I7 8700 or i9 9900.

K
koling111
Junior Member
43
11-07-2018, 03:20 PM
#8
The addition of 6 new cores exceeds the performance of the existing 8 old cores. The new set outperforms the older ones.
K
koling111
11-07-2018, 03:20 PM #8

The addition of 6 new cores exceeds the performance of the existing 8 old cores. The new set outperforms the older ones.

M
Morty1000
Junior Member
20
11-08-2018, 12:51 AM
#9
I own an i9 9900k system. It tends to get hot without a solid motherboard and cooler. My setup includes an AORUS Z390 Ultra and a Noctua NH-D15. The i9 always runs at 5GHz (MCE) and I doubt it would perform well on a B365M DS3H. I previously overclocked it to all-core 5GHz at around 1.27v for about two years. Compared to newer 8-core CPUs, it matched a 2080 Ti but lagged behind a 3080 Ti in certain titles. I believe the 3080 Ti is the ideal choice for balance. Right now I’m sticking with the i9 9900k only for 4K gaming because it drops significantly at 1080p and 1440p, especially when paired with a 5800X or i9 11900K using a 3080 Ti or better. For optimal performance, a better motherboard would be needed, so I think a 12400F or higher would be more suitable.
M
Morty1000
11-08-2018, 12:51 AM #9

I own an i9 9900k system. It tends to get hot without a solid motherboard and cooler. My setup includes an AORUS Z390 Ultra and a Noctua NH-D15. The i9 always runs at 5GHz (MCE) and I doubt it would perform well on a B365M DS3H. I previously overclocked it to all-core 5GHz at around 1.27v for about two years. Compared to newer 8-core CPUs, it matched a 2080 Ti but lagged behind a 3080 Ti in certain titles. I believe the 3080 Ti is the ideal choice for balance. Right now I’m sticking with the i9 9900k only for 4K gaming because it drops significantly at 1080p and 1440p, especially when paired with a 5800X or i9 11900K using a 3080 Ti or better. For optimal performance, a better motherboard would be needed, so I think a 12400F or higher would be more suitable.

I
iStrafeNHop
Junior Member
5
11-08-2018, 02:24 AM
#10
I'd check the 12400f and higher models instead; the 9900k struggles in lows around 1% with certain games and a 3080 or higher even on 4K. If you already own one, it's fine. Purchasing one in 2022 isn't worth it.
I
iStrafeNHop
11-08-2018, 02:24 AM #10

I'd check the 12400f and higher models instead; the 9900k struggles in lows around 1% with certain games and a 3080 or higher even on 4K. If you already own one, it's fine. Purchasing one in 2022 isn't worth it.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next