F5F Stay Refreshed Software Operating Systems Kubuntu vs Nobara KDE for gaming!

Kubuntu vs Nobara KDE for gaming!

Kubuntu vs Nobara KDE for gaming!

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
B
BazBens
Junior Member
25
01-23-2016, 01:26 PM
#1
Hello! I've reviewed some past discussions on the forum and have decided between Kubuntu and Nobara KDE. I'm using an Intel Integrated Graphics on a laptop with an i5 6th generation CPU, and I'm struggling to choose between the two. Could you share your thoughts on which distribution offers better stability and performance? I appreciate your advice!
B
BazBens
01-23-2016, 01:26 PM #1

Hello! I've reviewed some past discussions on the forum and have decided between Kubuntu and Nobara KDE. I'm using an Intel Integrated Graphics on a laptop with an i5 6th generation CPU, and I'm struggling to choose between the two. Could you share your thoughts on which distribution offers better stability and performance? I appreciate your advice!

A
alexandre6768
Member
219
01-23-2016, 09:19 PM
#2
I would choose the Ubuntu-based version. Systems with Debian roots tend to have more resources and community assistance available.
A
alexandre6768
01-23-2016, 09:19 PM #2

I would choose the Ubuntu-based version. Systems with Debian roots tend to have more resources and community assistance available.

V
vaskata05
Member
77
01-23-2016, 10:18 PM
#3
Thanks for your message! I appreciate the context you provided. I’ve worked with Linux systems before and can manage simple troubleshooting tasks. You’re looking for a lightweight and stable OS without graphical issues or glitches. Based on that, I’d recommend considering distributions like Alpine Linux or Lubuntu, which are minimal and reliable. If you’re open to alternatives, Fedora Lite or Manjaro Light could also be good options. Let me know if you'd like more details!
V
vaskata05
01-23-2016, 10:18 PM #3

Thanks for your message! I appreciate the context you provided. I’ve worked with Linux systems before and can manage simple troubleshooting tasks. You’re looking for a lightweight and stable OS without graphical issues or glitches. Based on that, I’d recommend considering distributions like Alpine Linux or Lubuntu, which are minimal and reliable. If you’re open to alternatives, Fedora Lite or Manjaro Light could also be good options. Let me know if you'd like more details!

H
husker53
Posting Freak
802
01-24-2016, 08:24 PM
#4
It doesn’t make much sense to set up KDE in that situation. All Linux distributions share similar core components. Desktop environments vary mainly in system needs and visual appeal, but I doubt there’s much more distinction between them. If you’re after a minimalist desktop that’s not as stripped-down as Fluxbox or as outdated as JWM, consider XFCE or MATE.
H
husker53
01-24-2016, 08:24 PM #4

It doesn’t make much sense to set up KDE in that situation. All Linux distributions share similar core components. Desktop environments vary mainly in system needs and visual appeal, but I doubt there’s much more distinction between them. If you’re after a minimalist desktop that’s not as stripped-down as Fluxbox or as outdated as JWM, consider XFCE or MATE.

M
MonkeyMan1125
Member
81
01-25-2016, 01:20 AM
#5
I chose KDE because it runs on Wayland, which I learned about. On my system, Integrated Graphics performs very well with it (as seen in several online discussions). Could you share your opinion?
M
MonkeyMan1125
01-25-2016, 01:20 AM #5

I chose KDE because it runs on Wayland, which I learned about. On my system, Integrated Graphics performs very well with it (as seen in several online discussions). Could you share your opinion?

R
RepoRizer
Posting Freak
872
01-25-2016, 02:48 AM
#6
KDE and GNOME both use Wayland. Choosing KDE might mean dealing with some issues like the ones you mentioned. KDE Plasma emphasizes features and options, aiming for power users with lots of settings. GNOME prioritizes simplicity and stability, focusing mainly on enterprise use. Your graphics card is old enough so performance should feel consistent across these distros. If you need a straightforward experience, PopOS or KDE Neon are good picks—they’re built on Ubuntu LTS and don’t have stability problems. For gaming, many updates affect gameplay less and can cause other problems. You’ll likely encounter bugs and compatibility challenges similar to those on Windows, but you’ll also face issues with Proton, Wine+, dxvk and vkd3d.
R
RepoRizer
01-25-2016, 02:48 AM #6

KDE and GNOME both use Wayland. Choosing KDE might mean dealing with some issues like the ones you mentioned. KDE Plasma emphasizes features and options, aiming for power users with lots of settings. GNOME prioritizes simplicity and stability, focusing mainly on enterprise use. Your graphics card is old enough so performance should feel consistent across these distros. If you need a straightforward experience, PopOS or KDE Neon are good picks—they’re built on Ubuntu LTS and don’t have stability problems. For gaming, many updates affect gameplay less and can cause other problems. You’ll likely encounter bugs and compatibility challenges similar to those on Windows, but you’ll also face issues with Proton, Wine+, dxvk and vkd3d.

J
jojobobo04
Member
170
02-13-2016, 11:49 AM
#7
Sure! It sounds like you were thinking about switching to GNOME because of its resource usage. PopOS runs on Cosmic DE, which is a solid choice if you're looking for performance. Let me know if you need more details!
J
jojobobo04
02-13-2016, 11:49 AM #7

Sure! It sounds like you were thinking about switching to GNOME because of its resource usage. PopOS runs on Cosmic DE, which is a solid choice if you're looking for performance. Let me know if you need more details!

M
manooon1128
Member
130
02-13-2016, 05:05 PM
#8
GNOME consumes a bit less memory than KDE. Currently, PopOS runs a modified version of GNOME, but they plan to transition to their new Desktop Environment called cosmic soon. Until a real release appears, no one will know for sure. When choosing, it depends on personal preference—each desktop environment and distribution offers its own advantages and drawbacks. As someone who uses both KDE and GNOME, I find GNOME generally more stable, while KDE provides more features and customization options.
M
manooon1128
02-13-2016, 05:05 PM #8

GNOME consumes a bit less memory than KDE. Currently, PopOS runs a modified version of GNOME, but they plan to transition to their new Desktop Environment called cosmic soon. Until a real release appears, no one will know for sure. When choosing, it depends on personal preference—each desktop environment and distribution offers its own advantages and drawbacks. As someone who uses both KDE and GNOME, I find GNOME generally more stable, while KDE provides more features and customization options.

E
encoder92
Member
66
02-16-2016, 07:44 AM
#9
It's great to hear you're comfortable with both KDE and GNOME! I'm here for any questions you have. Which platform are you currently using? And which one do you think performed better for gaming?
E
encoder92
02-16-2016, 07:44 AM #9

It's great to hear you're comfortable with both KDE and GNOME! I'm here for any questions you have. Which platform are you currently using? And which one do you think performed better for gaming?

M
Madthunder2t3
Member
195
02-18-2016, 04:15 PM
#10
I work with Arch and the developers shouldn't notice any changes in gaming performance.
M
Madthunder2t3
02-18-2016, 04:15 PM #10

I work with Arch and the developers shouldn't notice any changes in gaming performance.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next