F5F Stay Refreshed Software PC Gaming Issues with Fallout 4 installation requirements

Issues with Fallout 4 installation requirements

Issues with Fallout 4 installation requirements

Pages (3): 1 2 3 Next
B
BlueStar_LH
Posting Freak
842
01-07-2019, 11:39 AM
#1
The actual demands for Fallout 4 are extreme, yet people seem more annoyed by the reaction than by the requirements themselves. I've read online comments suggesting the game isn’t that bad compared to Battlefield, even though Fallout’s specs are way tougher. Isn’t everyone ignoring the need for a 330 USD CPU to run it at high settings? No one recalls the old expectations for an i3 processor. Now it seems even an i3 doesn’t meet the minimum? What am I missing? Why aren’t those without the expensive CPU upset me?
B
BlueStar_LH
01-07-2019, 11:39 AM #1

The actual demands for Fallout 4 are extreme, yet people seem more annoyed by the reaction than by the requirements themselves. I've read online comments suggesting the game isn’t that bad compared to Battlefield, even though Fallout’s specs are way tougher. Isn’t everyone ignoring the need for a 330 USD CPU to run it at high settings? No one recalls the old expectations for an i3 processor. Now it seems even an i3 doesn’t meet the minimum? What am I missing? Why aren’t those without the expensive CPU upset me?

I
iiSweeTzz
Posting Freak
862
01-28-2019, 11:03 AM
#2
Requirements are mostly meaningless 99% of the time
I
iiSweeTzz
01-28-2019, 11:03 AM #2

Requirements are mostly meaningless 99% of the time

T
towwl
Member
63
01-28-2019, 03:57 PM
#3
This means you're looking for the top-tier 4th generation Intel chip, not just any high-end processor. Even with that, you'll likely need to push it beyond its limits since it's an unlocked model. The listing doesn't include non-K options as valid choices.
T
towwl
01-28-2019, 03:57 PM #3

This means you're looking for the top-tier 4th generation Intel chip, not just any high-end processor. Even with that, you'll likely need to push it beyond its limits since it's an unlocked model. The listing doesn't include non-K options as valid choices.

C
ChocoMonster
Member
145
01-30-2019, 03:06 PM
#4
Looking for a good deal on the FX-9590? Check out this offer at $240.
C
ChocoMonster
01-30-2019, 03:06 PM #4

Looking for a good deal on the FX-9590? Check out this offer at $240.

I
70
01-30-2019, 04:11 PM
#5
The lowest specs are actually pretty reasonable, matching a Haswell i3. The i7 suggestion seems overkill and won't make much difference. A Haswell i5 should perform just as well as the i7 recommended. Bethesda titles tend to rely more on the CPU than the graphics card.
I
ItsuwariNoKami
01-30-2019, 04:11 PM #5

The lowest specs are actually pretty reasonable, matching a Haswell i3. The i7 suggestion seems overkill and won't make much difference. A Haswell i5 should perform just as well as the i7 recommended. Bethesda titles tend to rely more on the CPU than the graphics card.

A
AndrewMF
Junior Member
5
02-06-2019, 07:26 AM
#6
A
AndrewMF
02-06-2019, 07:26 AM #6

N
N4ox
Member
122
02-06-2019, 04:13 PM
#7
The i3-6300t for Battlefront seems like it would be on par with the old i5-2300. I could be wrong, but I'm confident they're similar. The i7 they recommend is probably because the game is open-world, not like Battlefront. There's more stuff going on in those kinds of games than in FPS's I would imagine. Nothing wrong here. Only thing I see that's flat out retarded is how they're saying shit like "Thankfully, these are more reasonable than those for Battlefront and my PC should do the job, which is excellent news." (from PCGamer) when they're almost similar.
N
N4ox
02-06-2019, 04:13 PM #7

The i3-6300t for Battlefront seems like it would be on par with the old i5-2300. I could be wrong, but I'm confident they're similar. The i7 they recommend is probably because the game is open-world, not like Battlefront. There's more stuff going on in those kinds of games than in FPS's I would imagine. Nothing wrong here. Only thing I see that's flat out retarded is how they're saying shit like "Thankfully, these are more reasonable than those for Battlefront and my PC should do the job, which is excellent news." (from PCGamer) when they're almost similar.

X
xisco_11
Junior Member
17
02-07-2019, 07:30 PM
#8
noting they opted for an FX-9590 as a suggested CPU, I’d argue it’s leveraging more cores or threads.
X
xisco_11
02-07-2019, 07:30 PM #8

noting they opted for an FX-9590 as a suggested CPU, I’d argue it’s leveraging more cores or threads.

O
OKNK
Member
231
02-08-2019, 09:03 PM
#9
It's a lot of fluff, you won't see much gain switching from an i5 to an i7 in games. This has been proven many times before. If the game really demands that CPU for high or ultra performance, it's clearly not well optimized. I wouldn't hesitate to skip it unless we get more real-world benchmarks soon. To be honest, the recommended specs usually apply to 4K at ultra settings. It seemed similar with MGS too—my CPU didn’t match the specs, but I still maintained around 60fps at 4K.
O
OKNK
02-08-2019, 09:03 PM #9

It's a lot of fluff, you won't see much gain switching from an i5 to an i7 in games. This has been proven many times before. If the game really demands that CPU for high or ultra performance, it's clearly not well optimized. I wouldn't hesitate to skip it unless we get more real-world benchmarks soon. To be honest, the recommended specs usually apply to 4K at ultra settings. It seemed similar with MGS too—my CPU didn’t match the specs, but I still maintained around 60fps at 4K.

A
ajthib01
Junior Member
31
02-09-2019, 03:38 AM
#10
Expectations often rise high, but don’t worry about performance drops—just use an i7 if needed. And remember, tweak your configurations regularly for better results.
A
ajthib01
02-09-2019, 03:38 AM #10

Expectations often rise high, but don’t worry about performance drops—just use an i7 if needed. And remember, tweak your configurations regularly for better results.

Pages (3): 1 2 3 Next