F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Issue with RAM performance not meeting expected rates.

Issue with RAM performance not meeting expected rates.

Issue with RAM performance not meeting expected rates.

S
snuttisnutti
Member
206
12-04-2016, 10:23 PM
#1
Here’s a revised version of your message:

I’ve put together this build and added an extra set of Crucial RAM I found on sale during Black Friday—it was a solid deal, though I might just return it. Still, my current RAM might not be as good as these new ones. I updated the BIOS to version 3.12 and switched the RAM settings from automatic to Profile 1 for XMP. It doesn’t exceed 3200 MHz. I also tried setting it higher (6000 and 5200), but the system crashes before booting. This is my first attempt at manual configuration, so I’m not sure what to do next. Am I dealing with faulty RAM?
S
snuttisnutti
12-04-2016, 10:23 PM #1

Here’s a revised version of your message:

I’ve put together this build and added an extra set of Crucial RAM I found on sale during Black Friday—it was a solid deal, though I might just return it. Still, my current RAM might not be as good as these new ones. I updated the BIOS to version 3.12 and switched the RAM settings from automatic to Profile 1 for XMP. It doesn’t exceed 3200 MHz. I also tried setting it higher (6000 and 5200), but the system crashes before booting. This is my first attempt at manual configuration, so I’m not sure what to do next. Am I dealing with faulty RAM?

M
McMush
Junior Member
16
12-05-2016, 12:19 AM
#2
Have you experimented with a single RAM configuration? Using multiple sets can be problematic and may lead to instability or boot issues. It will also limit performance to the slowest module, which is typical for 3200Mhz. If problems persist, check each stick individually—this could help you return or file a warranty claim.
M
McMush
12-05-2016, 12:19 AM #2

Have you experimented with a single RAM configuration? Using multiple sets can be problematic and may lead to instability or boot issues. It will also limit performance to the slowest module, which is typical for 3200Mhz. If problems persist, check each stick individually—this could help you return or file a warranty claim.

X
XxGrenidierXx
Posting Freak
813
12-05-2016, 11:02 PM
#3
Ik heb geen informatie over een mobo of CPU.
X
XxGrenidierXx
12-05-2016, 11:02 PM #3

Ik heb geen informatie over een mobo of CPU.

E
eduardodd08
Posting Freak
852
12-06-2016, 05:05 AM
#4
You have two very different kits, which isn't ideal. Additionally, four sticks are scheduled with strict time limits, which is even worse. Consider whether you truly require 64GB of RAM or if it's just something you like.
E
eduardodd08
12-06-2016, 05:05 AM #4

You have two very different kits, which isn't ideal. Additionally, four sticks are scheduled with strict time limits, which is even worse. Consider whether you truly require 64GB of RAM or if it's just something you like.

S
SirDerpyTurtle
Junior Member
33
12-06-2016, 05:58 AM
#5
Apologies, but are you attempting to use two separate RAM modules simultaneously to achieve a total of 64GB or increase RAM capacity at once? I’m not doing that. The G.Skill chip is installed, but I’m unable to reach its maximum speed of 6000MHz—currently capped around 3200MHz. Raising the frequency further prevents the system from booting.
S
SirDerpyTurtle
12-06-2016, 05:58 AM #5

Apologies, but are you attempting to use two separate RAM modules simultaneously to achieve a total of 64GB or increase RAM capacity at once? I’m not doing that. The G.Skill chip is installed, but I’m unable to reach its maximum speed of 6000MHz—currently capped around 3200MHz. Raising the frequency further prevents the system from booting.

R
RMUMAURICE777
Senior Member
375
12-19-2016, 10:58 PM
#6
I don't do it that way. The main concern is whether the RAM fits in the QVL and if using a different kit you can still work with it.
R
RMUMAURICE777
12-19-2016, 10:58 PM #6

I don't do it that way. The main concern is whether the RAM fits in the QVL and if using a different kit you can still work with it.

P
Pietrodar
Member
166
12-19-2016, 11:17 PM
#7
You tried installing both sets at once, switching one at a time. The Flare X5 you own works best on a 7800x3d board, needing multiple tries to lock in the EXPO profile and even then using Ryzen Master rather than BIOS. On an Intel system like yours, that path isn’t available—XTU would be a better alternative. As Mark Kaine noted, it’s likely you have good RAM, and QVL kits are a solid choice to handle compatibility issues. While Flare kits are meant for RYZEN (EXPO) setups, Ripjaws kits are built for Intel (XMP). Still, neither should block the other from running in the opposite configuration.
P
Pietrodar
12-19-2016, 11:17 PM #7

You tried installing both sets at once, switching one at a time. The Flare X5 you own works best on a 7800x3d board, needing multiple tries to lock in the EXPO profile and even then using Ryzen Master rather than BIOS. On an Intel system like yours, that path isn’t available—XTU would be a better alternative. As Mark Kaine noted, it’s likely you have good RAM, and QVL kits are a solid choice to handle compatibility issues. While Flare kits are meant for RYZEN (EXPO) setups, Ripjaws kits are built for Intel (XMP). Still, neither should block the other from running in the opposite configuration.

J
Juky_Juk
Member
53
12-20-2016, 12:54 AM
#8
Are there alternative XMP settings available? Occasionally Profile 1 is too strong, while Profile 2 might be sufficient.
J
Juky_Juk
12-20-2016, 12:54 AM #8

Are there alternative XMP settings available? Occasionally Profile 1 is too strong, while Profile 2 might be sufficient.