Is using an RTX 5060 8GB GPU a bad match for a Core Ultra 9 285K CPU?
Is using an RTX 5060 8GB GPU a bad match for a Core Ultra 9 285K CPU?
Running a Plex server for media streaming with intense Chrome use and numerous open tabs. Simultaneously playing multiple 4K 60fps videos. Performing 4K and 5.3K video editing with tools such as Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve. This is not a regular occurrence; it's occasional. I'm not a dedicated video editor. Occasionally playing CS2 and older games at high settings. Gaming isn't my main focus—my primary setup is a PS5 for serious gaming. After several exchanges, I'm leaning toward Intel Core 9 285K over the Ryzen 9950K because 14,900k is just as capable if not more so, especially given my hot climate where air conditioning isn't available 24/7. I've kept my previous PC for nine years and don't plan to upgrade it before at least eight years. After that, I intend to build a new system from scratch. I'm avoiding the i5 because it might feel underpowered in a few years. Adding a GPU does increase costs, so I'm considering an RTX 5060 with 8GB. However, I'm unsure if it will become a significant bottleneck for the CPU. General advice I've seen online is to prioritize the GPU for gaming and the CPU for productivity. So, an RTX 5060 8GB should suffice, though editing 5.3K GoPro videos occasionally might push it a bit. Most tasks beyond 4K are handled by the GPU. I'm not sure what to expect. Any suggestions?
Welcome to the forums, newcomer!
Heavy Chrome usage with tons of open tabs
Define what you mean by
tons
. In this department you don't need VRAM, you need copious amounts of ram.
Per my research, you should be fine though I'm questioning why you need an Ultra 9 in the first place. In 8 years time, a lot will change to the point you're going to need a new platform entirely.
Heavy Chrome usage means around 50 tabs open, which isn't a major concern anymore since they consume less memory and are RAM-heavy rather than VRAM-heavy. Some tabs include chatrooms that aren't well optimized, consuming many resources.
I frequently compare two or more 4k60 or 5.3k videos by size on my ultrawide 2k monitor. These files can be in Chrome or simply video formats I play with VLC.
Occasionally I export RAW photos from Lightroom after editing. I believe Core Ultra 285K is probably too much for this task alone. However, I also sometimes re-render videos—such as converting from 5.3k to 4k—and create smooth slow motion effects using Adobe Premiere's optical flow.
I also handle code compilations and dockers, but these are manageable on an older system with sufficient RAM.
Overall, the main concern is not feeling underpowered on my CPU after four years. I’m comfortable building a new PC from scratch after eight years.
The idea of upgrading to a lower-tier CPU hasn’t been completely ruled out if I’m convinced there’s little real benefit in opting for the higher-end option.
Similar tools such as Adobe Premiere Pro, Photoshop, DaVinci Resolve and Topaz Video AI make use of the GPU at resolutions below 4K. In many situations, both CPU and GPU are equally utilized (approximately 50:50). At other times it could be 60:40 or 40:60, but the GPU still receives a fair portion of the workload, especially when CUDA is involved.
I appreciate your hesitation about purchasing an extremely costly GPU after recently upgrading from a 12GB RTX 3060 (from 2022) to a 12GB RTX 4070 (2024). I’m considering a 32GB RTX 5090, but...
As per Puget Systems’ website, DaVinci Resolve utilizes more GPU memory compared to Premiere Pro.
https://www.pugetsystems.com/soluti...on...endations/
Recommended VRAM for DaVinci:
Timeline Resolution
1080p
4K
6K/8K
Minimum VRAM capacity
8GB
12GB
20GB+
https://www.pugetsystems.com/soluti.../a...endations/
Recommended VRAM for Premiere Pro:
Sequence Resolution
1080p
4K
6K
8K+
Minimum VRAM capacity
4GB
8GB
12GB
16GB+
Since you’re not constantly editing videos, an 8GB VRAM should suffice and you might consider upgrading to a card with 12GB or 16GB in the future.
When using Topaz Video AI to stabilize older 1080p DAT files and upscale to 4K, the software efficiently utilizes all available CPU cores and CUDA cores on the GPU. I observe significant power consumption—up to 210W from the 7950X and around 200W from the RTX 4070. The system draws about 420W continuously during extended sessions with Topaz. My editing workloads are minimal, mainly involving a GoPro Hero 11 in 4K.
If you can afford it, opt for the 285K. If you’re still unsure, go for the 265K and consider investing in a more powerful GPU (perhaps an RTX 5070). Stick with NVidia if you need CUDA support for video applications.
I recommend 64GB of system RAM (two 32GB modules). Review the recommended specifications for your top programs; you may require additional memory.
For those with greater financial means, Puget is willing to offer a Threadripper or Xeon system equipped with 4 or 8-channel memory controllers. Time is valuable for professionals.
I think the 265k + 5060 16GB / 5070 12GB offers a better balance. The 285k adds more efficiency cores, while both chips share the same 8 Performance cores. The 5070 with 18GB might be released soon, so it could be worth holding off on that one.