F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking Is this setup secure?

Is this setup secure?

Is this setup secure?

Pages (2): 1 2 Next
J
jerrydog01
Senior Member
703
02-21-2018, 08:43 PM
#1
Hello!
I was able to stabilize my 9700K at 5.1 GHZ with an average of 1.39 volts. The peak voltages reach up to 1.44V, but they only occur briefly and don't remain high. Temperatures are within the acceptable range (68-74°C) during CPU-heavy gaming sessions.
Is this a safe setup for the long run? Should I continue using it this way?
Thanks!
J
jerrydog01
02-21-2018, 08:43 PM #1

Hello!
I was able to stabilize my 9700K at 5.1 GHZ with an average of 1.39 volts. The peak voltages reach up to 1.44V, but they only occur briefly and don't remain high. Temperatures are within the acceptable range (68-74°C) during CPU-heavy gaming sessions.
Is this a safe setup for the long run? Should I continue using it this way?
Thanks!

K
ken810
Member
66
03-13-2018, 03:02 AM
#2
You've been a member since November 8th, 2016 with 35 posts, which means we don't often see you around. It's always great to connect with someone of your experience. Maybe we can share some useful insights and viewpoints on your questions.
K
ken810
03-13-2018, 03:02 AM #2

You've been a member since November 8th, 2016 with 35 posts, which means we don't often see you around. It's always great to connect with someone of your experience. Maybe we can share some useful insights and viewpoints on your questions.

F
fiona12
Member
139
03-13-2018, 04:49 AM
#3
Is this stable for YOU?
Does it indicate you can reach the goals you set?
Is there any connection to maintaining thermal balance under maximum stress?
If neither is correct, then your overclock may not meet acceptable limits.
A brief summary of how to verify overclock stability.

In BIOS, adjust the CPU multiplier and voltage to the desired values. Avoid presets—they can cause unintended changes in core and other voltages. It’s preferable to set most core parameters manually and keep any remaining adjustments for later tweaks, such as cache frequency, system agent voltage, VCCIO settings, memory speeds, or timings, once the CPU is fully stable.

Save your BIOS configuration (creating a new profile if supported) and exit.
Launch Windows and install Prime95 version 26.6.
Install HWinfo or CoreTemp, then open one of them.

Execute Prime95 with AVX and AVX2 disabled in the settings menu, selecting "Small FFT test option," and run it for 15 minutes while keeping an eye on core and package temperatures to ensure they stay within the CPU’s thermal limits (generally around 80°C for Intel and current Ryzen models).

For older AMD FX and Phenom chips, use a thermal monitor with "Distance to TJmax" settings set to avoid drops below 10°C. Staying within this range keeps you inside the safe thermal zone.

If the CPU passes the thermal test, proceed to stability checks.
Download and install Realbench, then run the Stress test using memory options roughly half your installed RAM (e.g., 8GB for 16GB). Let it run for 8 hours without using the system. This simulates real-world conditions and tests stability under load.

If you need further assurance, consider Prime95 Blend mode or Small FFT for extended periods. You can skip HWinfo or CoreTemp during this phase since the thermal compliance has already been verified.

Should any instability appear during these tests—whether from Realbench, Prime95, or another tool—adjust BIOS settings (lower multiplier or increase voltage) and restart. Recheck temperatures; if they exceed safe limits, the test fails.

For more detailed guidance, refer to beginner-friendly CPU overclocking resources, especially those addressing Intel Core processors’ thermal guidelines.
F
fiona12
03-13-2018, 04:49 AM #3

Is this stable for YOU?
Does it indicate you can reach the goals you set?
Is there any connection to maintaining thermal balance under maximum stress?
If neither is correct, then your overclock may not meet acceptable limits.
A brief summary of how to verify overclock stability.

In BIOS, adjust the CPU multiplier and voltage to the desired values. Avoid presets—they can cause unintended changes in core and other voltages. It’s preferable to set most core parameters manually and keep any remaining adjustments for later tweaks, such as cache frequency, system agent voltage, VCCIO settings, memory speeds, or timings, once the CPU is fully stable.

Save your BIOS configuration (creating a new profile if supported) and exit.
Launch Windows and install Prime95 version 26.6.
Install HWinfo or CoreTemp, then open one of them.

Execute Prime95 with AVX and AVX2 disabled in the settings menu, selecting "Small FFT test option," and run it for 15 minutes while keeping an eye on core and package temperatures to ensure they stay within the CPU’s thermal limits (generally around 80°C for Intel and current Ryzen models).

For older AMD FX and Phenom chips, use a thermal monitor with "Distance to TJmax" settings set to avoid drops below 10°C. Staying within this range keeps you inside the safe thermal zone.

If the CPU passes the thermal test, proceed to stability checks.
Download and install Realbench, then run the Stress test using memory options roughly half your installed RAM (e.g., 8GB for 16GB). Let it run for 8 hours without using the system. This simulates real-world conditions and tests stability under load.

If you need further assurance, consider Prime95 Blend mode or Small FFT for extended periods. You can skip HWinfo or CoreTemp during this phase since the thermal compliance has already been verified.

Should any instability appear during these tests—whether from Realbench, Prime95, or another tool—adjust BIOS settings (lower multiplier or increase voltage) and restart. Recheck temperatures; if they exceed safe limits, the test fails.

For more detailed guidance, refer to beginner-friendly CPU overclocking resources, especially those addressing Intel Core processors’ thermal guidelines.

T
tlr13579
Member
178
03-17-2018, 02:12 AM
#4
Hello, Dark, I appreciate your attention to detail. Could you confirm whether running at this average voltage will not cause significant long-term degradation of the CPU?
T
tlr13579
03-17-2018, 02:12 AM #4

Hello, Dark, I appreciate your attention to detail. Could you confirm whether running at this average voltage will not cause significant long-term degradation of the CPU?

B
Blakem16
Member
154
03-20-2018, 09:08 AM
#5
I wouldn't mind if you asked the question, but it seems you're missing some key details that would make it clearer. Don't worry, we all don't know everything, and it's okay to expand our understanding by revisiting basics or adding new insights. You might find these helpful: How To - Intel CPU Temperature Guide Update: February 9th, 2025 Preface: Processor temperatures can be tricky. Misunderstandings about terms and specs often cause confusion about checking cooling performance. This guide offers... forums. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromigration
B
Blakem16
03-20-2018, 09:08 AM #5

I wouldn't mind if you asked the question, but it seems you're missing some key details that would make it clearer. Don't worry, we all don't know everything, and it's okay to expand our understanding by revisiting basics or adding new insights. You might find these helpful: How To - Intel CPU Temperature Guide Update: February 9th, 2025 Preface: Processor temperatures can be tricky. Misunderstandings about terms and specs often cause confusion about checking cooling performance. This guide offers... forums. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromigration

S
SorcererVevo
Member
180
03-20-2018, 10:30 AM
#6
It seems you might have misunderstood, but everything you copied is already familiar to me. I noticed your request was clear and straightforward, so I’ll just provide the original text as is.
S
SorcererVevo
03-20-2018, 10:30 AM #6

It seems you might have misunderstood, but everything you copied is already familiar to me. I noticed your request was clear and straightforward, so I’ll just provide the original text as is.

B
BubbaNitro
Member
160
03-20-2018, 05:55 PM
#7
If you understand all the details then you’re likely much more informed than anyone on this site or elsewhere, so there’s no need for outside help. You’re already ahead of most people here, including myself, the overclocking community, the Intel temperature guide author, and probably our CPU expert reviewer Crashman.

As noted in the Intel spec at the linked chart, 1.52v is the highest safe voltage for 9th gen Core-i processors. However, 1.40–1.45v (depending on who you ask) is generally considered the maximum recommended voltage, with 1.4v being a safer choice for long-term use. At 1.39v you’re comfortably within the safe range. Whether stability or thermal compliance matters depends on your setup, but since you’re an experienced overclocker, you should be able to judge this yourself.

You can read more in the guide here: https://www.tweaktown.com/guides/8481/co...ndex5.html
B
BubbaNitro
03-20-2018, 05:55 PM #7

If you understand all the details then you’re likely much more informed than anyone on this site or elsewhere, so there’s no need for outside help. You’re already ahead of most people here, including myself, the overclocking community, the Intel temperature guide author, and probably our CPU expert reviewer Crashman.

As noted in the Intel spec at the linked chart, 1.52v is the highest safe voltage for 9th gen Core-i processors. However, 1.40–1.45v (depending on who you ask) is generally considered the maximum recommended voltage, with 1.4v being a safer choice for long-term use. At 1.39v you’re comfortably within the safe range. Whether stability or thermal compliance matters depends on your setup, but since you’re an experienced overclocker, you should be able to judge this yourself.

You can read more in the guide here: https://www.tweaktown.com/guides/8481/co...ndex5.html

C
CringeGod21
Junior Member
1
03-20-2018, 07:27 PM
#8
The P95 /small FFTs, custom/AVX2 disabled temperatures after 15-20 minutes, are more reflective of a consistent overclock evaluation.
C
CringeGod21
03-20-2018, 07:27 PM #8

The P95 /small FFTs, custom/AVX2 disabled temperatures after 15-20 minutes, are more reflective of a consistent overclock evaluation.

K
KENUEL662
Junior Member
36
03-20-2018, 09:25 PM
#9
That would be more indicative of thermal compliance than stability, to me at least.
K
KENUEL662
03-20-2018, 09:25 PM #9

That would be more indicative of thermal compliance than stability, to me at least.

C
crystal78248
Member
150
03-21-2018, 04:09 AM
#10
These P95 readings are irrelevant when a user is just browsing the internet. Check elsewhere for actual game temperatures.
C
crystal78248
03-21-2018, 04:09 AM #10

These P95 readings are irrelevant when a user is just browsing the internet. Check elsewhere for actual game temperatures.

Pages (2): 1 2 Next