F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Is this a suitable build, considering any potential issues?

Is this a suitable build, considering any potential issues?

Is this a suitable build, considering any potential issues?

M
mans0203
Member
64
01-27-2024, 10:05 PM
#1
Phanteks Eclipse G360A Mid Tower
ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER EVO OC
Intel Core i7-14700F Tray CPU
Cooler Master ML240L
Kingston Fury Renegade DDR5 6000Mhz 32GB
Kingston M.2 NV2 PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD 2TB
ASUS TUF GAMING B760-PLUS WIFI Hovedkort
Corsair RMe Series RM750e PSU
Ideal for gaming
M
mans0203
01-27-2024, 10:05 PM #1

Phanteks Eclipse G360A Mid Tower
ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER EVO OC
Intel Core i7-14700F Tray CPU
Cooler Master ML240L
Kingston Fury Renegade DDR5 6000Mhz 32GB
Kingston M.2 NV2 PCIe 4.0 NVMe SSD 2TB
ASUS TUF GAMING B760-PLUS WIFI Hovedkort
Corsair RMe Series RM750e PSU
Ideal for gaming

X
XenonZZ
Junior Member
8
02-04-2024, 04:11 PM
#2
There is no such concept as "bottlenecking"
If upgrading a cpu or graphics card somehow reduces your performance or FPS.
A more accurate term could be limiting factor.
This happens when adding more cpu or gpu becomes less effective.
Your components appear fairly balanced between cpu and gpu.
The i7-14700F comes with 65w power and includes a decent RM1 air cooler.
This is just my view, but you might want to spend about $25 extra for the non-F version of the processor.
Eventually you'll regret not having integrated graphics.
X
XenonZZ
02-04-2024, 04:11 PM #2

There is no such concept as "bottlenecking"
If upgrading a cpu or graphics card somehow reduces your performance or FPS.
A more accurate term could be limiting factor.
This happens when adding more cpu or gpu becomes less effective.
Your components appear fairly balanced between cpu and gpu.
The i7-14700F comes with 65w power and includes a decent RM1 air cooler.
This is just my view, but you might want to spend about $25 extra for the non-F version of the processor.
Eventually you'll regret not having integrated graphics.

N
Nicktron_
Member
199
02-04-2024, 06:14 PM
#3
It's a good joke though. I searched for the "bottleneck calculator" and because the 9950X wasn't an option, I used the 7950X and 4090 and pressed "calculate." The site said the 4090 is limited by 21% CPU usage. What? How could anyone trust that information? It seems completely pointless.
N
Nicktron_
02-04-2024, 06:14 PM #3

It's a good joke though. I searched for the "bottleneck calculator" and because the 9950X wasn't an option, I used the 7950X and 4090 and pressed "calculate." The site said the 4090 is limited by 21% CPU usage. What? How could anyone trust that information? It seems completely pointless.

J
Jatinsukhija
Member
69
02-06-2024, 01:56 PM
#4
However, there are individuals who do this too.
J
Jatinsukhija
02-06-2024, 01:56 PM #4

However, there are individuals who do this too.

G
GamingPanda54
Member
230
02-08-2024, 05:10 AM
#5
It's surprising... even without knowing much about PCs, common sense tells us this information is useless.
The Intel Core 14900k isn't strong enough for an RTX 4090 when using a 3840 × 2160 resolution display for demanding tasks.
This setup has a 22.3% processor bottleneck.
G
GamingPanda54
02-08-2024, 05:10 AM #5

It's surprising... even without knowing much about PCs, common sense tells us this information is useless.
The Intel Core 14900k isn't strong enough for an RTX 4090 when using a 3840 × 2160 resolution display for demanding tasks.
This setup has a 22.3% processor bottleneck.

V
VitoSEXY
Posting Freak
797
02-08-2024, 06:15 AM
#6
I would suggest the 7800X3D for gaming. No worries about processor instability.
The Intel Bartlett lake would be the redeeming CPU lineup to save it, have to see reviews and decide if it is worth it.
V
VitoSEXY
02-08-2024, 06:15 AM #6

I would suggest the 7800X3D for gaming. No worries about processor instability.
The Intel Bartlett lake would be the redeeming CPU lineup to save it, have to see reviews and decide if it is worth it.

D
Doctor_Pi
Member
214
02-08-2024, 02:16 PM
#7
Bottlenecking calculators often seem humorous since tasks vary widely. Some games demand more CPU power, others more GPU. Players adjust settings differently, which can lead to early memory issues. One game shows a 6% GPU bottleneck in my current configuration, yet another requires a CPU upgrade because it struggles with high frame rates, forcing my GPU to operate at just 30% usage. How can a GPU running only half its clock speed be the limiting factor when a CPU can handle much higher performance? In both scenarios, the GPU bottleneck doesn’t actually matter.
D
Doctor_Pi
02-08-2024, 02:16 PM #7

Bottlenecking calculators often seem humorous since tasks vary widely. Some games demand more CPU power, others more GPU. Players adjust settings differently, which can lead to early memory issues. One game shows a 6% GPU bottleneck in my current configuration, yet another requires a CPU upgrade because it struggles with high frame rates, forcing my GPU to operate at just 30% usage. How can a GPU running only half its clock speed be the limiting factor when a CPU can handle much higher performance? In both scenarios, the GPU bottleneck doesn’t actually matter.

K
Kemorno
Junior Member
4
02-15-2024, 11:16 AM
#8
In my view, all the outputs from the bottleneck calculator are incorrect. If you adhere to their guidelines, you might also waste money without solving the issue and increase unnecessary stress. Just check your CPU and GPU bottlenecks using Formark when you run it—this helps determine if there’s a problem with the card or processor. If it stops, it suggests the GPU and CPU are the bottleneck. Send feedback
K
Kemorno
02-15-2024, 11:16 AM #8

In my view, all the outputs from the bottleneck calculator are incorrect. If you adhere to their guidelines, you might also waste money without solving the issue and increase unnecessary stress. Just check your CPU and GPU bottlenecks using Formark when you run it—this helps determine if there’s a problem with the card or processor. If it stops, it suggests the GPU and CPU are the bottleneck. Send feedback