F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking Is the voltage of your 10900k model suitable?

Is the voltage of your 10900k model suitable?

Is the voltage of your 10900k model suitable?

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3 Next
B
brogzter
Member
82
03-20-2020, 06:27 AM
#11
Take a look at the final five minutes of the video. Jay mentions some details about overclocking on this CPU, but it seems to be a mixed experience.
B
brogzter
03-20-2020, 06:27 AM #11

Take a look at the final five minutes of the video. Jay mentions some details about overclocking on this CPU, but it seems to be a mixed experience.

J
Joris_boef
Member
51
03-20-2020, 11:25 AM
#12
Just watched it, and it makes sense. It's tough to picture reaching 5.2 ghz, let alone 5.3 on this device. I made some adjustments. I reduced my RAM from 3600 XMP to 2933 xmp disabled. After that, everything booted up properly. I kept the CPU at 5.1 and lowered the voltage to 1.28 after several tries just to test. It turned out it's handling it at 1.28, fluctuating between 1.28 and 1.318 during testing with a max temperature of 72.
J
Joris_boef
03-20-2020, 11:25 AM #12

Just watched it, and it makes sense. It's tough to picture reaching 5.2 ghz, let alone 5.3 on this device. I made some adjustments. I reduced my RAM from 3600 XMP to 2933 xmp disabled. After that, everything booted up properly. I kept the CPU at 5.1 and lowered the voltage to 1.28 after several tries just to test. It turned out it's handling it at 1.28, fluctuating between 1.28 and 1.318 during testing with a max temperature of 72.

M
mattypotato
Junior Member
2
04-09-2020, 03:19 PM
#13
The LLC height is configured to handle voltage droop, though raising it may lead to excessive overvoltage during the recovery phase. I noticed you're using Auto LLC, but I can't confirm the exact setting—it might be around 0.3v. I wish I could provide typical values for this chip, but it's still relatively new. Even Silicon Lottery doesn't have a complete reference for the 3 K CPUs yet; currently, it's listed at 10700K.
M
mattypotato
04-09-2020, 03:19 PM #13

The LLC height is configured to handle voltage droop, though raising it may lead to excessive overvoltage during the recovery phase. I noticed you're using Auto LLC, but I can't confirm the exact setting—it might be around 0.3v. I wish I could provide typical values for this chip, but it's still relatively new. Even Silicon Lottery doesn't have a complete reference for the 3 K CPUs yet; currently, it's listed at 10700K.

R
108
04-10-2020, 12:17 AM
#14
I checked there to compare and analyze, but no 10900k stats are available yet. Going as low as 1.265v caused instability, even at 1.28, with crashes during benchmarking. I changed the LLC setting from auto to LLC 1; it seems to help, though my voltage stays between 1.28 and 1.318. A few benchmarks in that range are holding stable. I’ve only managed to reach this voltage after lowering my RAM frequency. I’m not sure if CPU and RAM work together like that, but could a higher RAM frequency require more voltage for the CPU to clock certain speeds? That’s unclear.
R
RainbowGirl328
04-10-2020, 12:17 AM #14

I checked there to compare and analyze, but no 10900k stats are available yet. Going as low as 1.265v caused instability, even at 1.28, with crashes during benchmarking. I changed the LLC setting from auto to LLC 1; it seems to help, though my voltage stays between 1.28 and 1.318. A few benchmarks in that range are holding stable. I’ve only managed to reach this voltage after lowering my RAM frequency. I’m not sure if CPU and RAM work together like that, but could a higher RAM frequency require more voltage for the CPU to clock certain speeds? That’s unclear.

L
Lizzy310
Junior Member
44
04-18-2020, 12:05 AM
#15
I haven't encountered that recently... the last mention was during the Kaby Lake (7th gen) launch, where certain players achieved 5.0ghz on their 7700K by reducing memory usage or disabling the XMP profile.
L
Lizzy310
04-18-2020, 12:05 AM #15

I haven't encountered that recently... the last mention was during the Kaby Lake (7th gen) launch, where certain players achieved 5.0ghz on their 7700K by reducing memory usage or disabling the XMP profile.

Z
zLeoZiin
Senior Member
503
04-24-2020, 10:30 PM
#16
I've been going through some reading material, and it looks like the most effective method for overclocking the CPU is to avoid using software for OC since the BIOS already handles it (it seems clear). I removed all related software from my PC concerning Intel XTU. I started from the BIOS and attempted to adjust the OC to 5.1, but nothing else had changed. Once I restarted, the CPUID and HWINFO tools indicated my clock was at 5.0. I tried changing other clocks like 5.2 and 4.8, but they didn't stick either. My voltage is set to auto, which appears to be working as long as I change the OC settings, yet the frequency remains unchanged. After giving up on the BIOS, I used DragonCenter with its DPC Latency tuner. I adjusted it to 4.8 and restarted, but the clock still stuck at 5.0. Even though I removed XTU, could it have retained some default settings on my system?
Z
zLeoZiin
04-24-2020, 10:30 PM #16

I've been going through some reading material, and it looks like the most effective method for overclocking the CPU is to avoid using software for OC since the BIOS already handles it (it seems clear). I removed all related software from my PC concerning Intel XTU. I started from the BIOS and attempted to adjust the OC to 5.1, but nothing else had changed. Once I restarted, the CPUID and HWINFO tools indicated my clock was at 5.0. I tried changing other clocks like 5.2 and 4.8, but they didn't stick either. My voltage is set to auto, which appears to be working as long as I change the OC settings, yet the frequency remains unchanged. After giving up on the BIOS, I used DragonCenter with its DPC Latency tuner. I adjusted it to 4.8 and restarted, but the clock still stuck at 5.0. Even though I removed XTU, could it have retained some default settings on my system?

G
gavin_shaka
Senior Member
535
04-25-2020, 05:44 AM
#17
Did you remove it correctly through 'Add or Remove Programs,' or were you simply deleting the files in File Explorer?
Your issue might also stem from some early BIOS behavior.
G
gavin_shaka
04-25-2020, 05:44 AM #17

Did you remove it correctly through 'Add or Remove Programs,' or were you simply deleting the files in File Explorer?
Your issue might also stem from some early BIOS behavior.

A
Abbasaurus
Member
209
04-25-2020, 08:30 AM
#18
Yes, I removed the program via the add/remove list. Checked MSI's support page for my motherboard—current version installed, up to date. Also verified in Dragon Center with no newer updates found. Motherboard model: Z490 MSI Godlike.
A
Abbasaurus
04-25-2020, 08:30 AM #18

Yes, I removed the program via the add/remove list. Checked MSI's support page for my motherboard—current version installed, up to date. Also verified in Dragon Center with no newer updates found. Motherboard model: Z490 MSI Godlike.

D
David_Martial
Member
231
05-14-2020, 10:53 AM
#19
It might just be a minor glitch with the bios – a fresh socket, after all.
D
David_Martial
05-14-2020, 10:53 AM #19

It might just be a minor glitch with the bios – a fresh socket, after all.

F
FaithoOcOrea
Member
178
05-15-2020, 10:44 PM
#20
I understand your point now. So, the delay if that's the situation.
F
FaithoOcOrea
05-15-2020, 10:44 PM #20

I understand your point now. So, the delay if that's the situation.

Pages (3): Previous 1 2 3 Next