F5F Stay Refreshed Power Users Overclocking Is the CPU speed lower than the BIOS configuration when running at full load in Windows 10?

Is the CPU speed lower than the BIOS configuration when running at full load in Windows 10?

Is the CPU speed lower than the BIOS configuration when running at full load in Windows 10?

J
jmk_0605
Member
65
05-04-2016, 04:02 PM
#1
I own a 4690k on a Gigabyte motherboard that I overclocked to 4.2Ghz.
I just switched to Windows 10.
Recently, I observed my CPU was only operating at 1.8Ghz under full load.
Not overheating detected, and the power supply seems fine.
I spent time adjusting Windows power settings and BIOS, but I can't achieve overclocking or turbo mode.
The only stable setting is a constant 3.5GHz in Windows Performance mode, with all C states turned off in BIOS.
With C states active, performance drops as the CPU workload increases.
It worked well in Windows 7.
Has anyone experienced this issue before?
J
jmk_0605
05-04-2016, 04:02 PM #1

I own a 4690k on a Gigabyte motherboard that I overclocked to 4.2Ghz.
I just switched to Windows 10.
Recently, I observed my CPU was only operating at 1.8Ghz under full load.
Not overheating detected, and the power supply seems fine.
I spent time adjusting Windows power settings and BIOS, but I can't achieve overclocking or turbo mode.
The only stable setting is a constant 3.5GHz in Windows Performance mode, with all C states turned off in BIOS.
With C states active, performance drops as the CPU workload increases.
It worked well in Windows 7.
Has anyone experienced this issue before?

S
Supr3matt
Member
73
05-06-2016, 10:47 AM
#2
i5 4690k running at 4.2Ghz with a stock cooler from Gigabyte H81
H-Boards are typically for non-K CPUs and aren't designed for overclocking, which could explain the situation.
For unlocked CPUs, Z-Boards work well; any Z97 board will suffice.
S
Supr3matt
05-06-2016, 10:47 AM #2

i5 4690k running at 4.2Ghz with a stock cooler from Gigabyte H81
H-Boards are typically for non-K CPUs and aren't designed for overclocking, which could explain the situation.
For unlocked CPUs, Z-Boards work well; any Z97 board will suffice.

L
Llyodsk
Member
164
05-06-2016, 02:29 PM
#3
i5 4690k running at 4.2Ghz with a stock cooler from Gigabyte H81
H-Boards are typically for non-K CPUs and aren't designed for overclocking, which could explain the situation.
For unlocked CPUs, Z-Boards work well; any Z97 board will suffice.
L
Llyodsk
05-06-2016, 02:29 PM #3

i5 4690k running at 4.2Ghz with a stock cooler from Gigabyte H81
H-Boards are typically for non-K CPUs and aren't designed for overclocking, which could explain the situation.
For unlocked CPUs, Z-Boards work well; any Z97 board will suffice.

L
Lior1001
Member
143
05-07-2016, 09:37 AM
#4
migronesien :
"i5 4690k at 4.2Ghz with stock cooler on Gigabyte H81"
H-Boards of usually for non-K CPUs so not made for overclocking that might be the reason.
You use Z-Boards for unlocked CPUs. Any Z97 board will do the job.
It ran OK on windows 7
L
Lior1001
05-07-2016, 09:37 AM #4

migronesien :
"i5 4690k at 4.2Ghz with stock cooler on Gigabyte H81"
H-Boards of usually for non-K CPUs so not made for overclocking that might be the reason.
You use Z-Boards for unlocked CPUs. Any Z97 board will do the job.
It ran OK on windows 7

E
epic_person2
Member
79
05-26-2016, 01:49 AM
#5
It might be worth revisiting Windows 7.
E
epic_person2
05-26-2016, 01:49 AM #5

It might be worth revisiting Windows 7.