F5F Stay Refreshed Hardware Desktop Is the 45-second boot time acceptable?

Is the 45-second boot time acceptable?

Is the 45-second boot time acceptable?

Pages (2): Previous 1 2
K
Kamikaze_007
Senior Member
625
07-25-2023, 06:29 PM
#11
What is the location of your boot drive and its current capacity?
K
Kamikaze_007
07-25-2023, 06:29 PM #11

What is the location of your boot drive and its current capacity?

M
Manuel_Pimpao
Member
63
07-27-2023, 02:52 AM
#12
OP discussed the startup durations of Windows, confirming it was acceptable. The problem lay in the POST times, which required more time to finish since these motherboard designs load memory during each boot.
M
Manuel_Pimpao
07-27-2023, 02:52 AM #12

OP discussed the startup durations of Windows, confirming it was acceptable. The problem lay in the POST times, which required more time to finish since these motherboard designs load memory during each boot.

T
Taoambre2
Junior Member
2
07-28-2023, 11:41 PM
#13
You could potentially reduce boot times by turning on "Memory Context Restore," though this varies by motherboard maker and depends on certain UEFI/AGESA updates (such as needing Memory Power Down enabled too). Review the requirements for your setup and consider preserving a backup of your current settings.
T
Taoambre2
07-28-2023, 11:41 PM #13

You could potentially reduce boot times by turning on "Memory Context Restore," though this varies by motherboard maker and depends on certain UEFI/AGESA updates (such as needing Memory Power Down enabled too). Review the requirements for your setup and consider preserving a backup of your current settings.

O
OG_Mystik
Junior Member
23
07-29-2023, 11:39 PM
#14
Turn off xmp and check for differences.
O
OG_Mystik
07-29-2023, 11:39 PM #14

Turn off xmp and check for differences.

D
Divicomix
Junior Member
1
07-30-2023, 05:59 AM
#15
Opt for sleep instead of shutting down your computer, avoiding hibernation. This keeps your PC and screen in a minimal power mode, almost like a power-off state. The advantage is that switching on and off takes just a few seconds.
D
Divicomix
07-30-2023, 05:59 AM #15

Opt for sleep instead of shutting down your computer, avoiding hibernation. This keeps your PC and screen in a minimal power mode, almost like a power-off state. The advantage is that switching on and off takes just a few seconds.

X
XaViZ
Member
197
07-31-2023, 09:32 AM
#16
I see, this is a lot of insight. Never knew any of this. Thanks man.
X
XaViZ
07-31-2023, 09:32 AM #16

I see, this is a lot of insight. Never knew any of this. Thanks man.

W
warzhell
Member
63
08-01-2023, 04:21 PM
#17
Taking the PC to sleep is a sensible approach. I configured it to do so after roughly three hours, since staying away that long increases the chance I missed shutting it down or left the house. Even in Windows 11, enabling sleep for the screen, storage, and system is straightforward. By default, it puts drives to sleep after about twenty minutes, which I found irritating, but that’s not the main concern.

The PC would still need to restart occasionally, but long boot times could be minimized.

I wouldn’t try to fix this issue excessively, particularly if BIOS updates are involved. There’s a risk of disrupting other components!

This PC functions adequately once the extended POST sequence finishes. This is partly due to the interaction between RAM and the motherboard, which sometimes traps users in a situation. It’s essentially a matter of luck with the hardware.

If BIOS adjustments could help, please share your suggestions. I believe the idea from someone like snemarch is worthwhile. Just remember that a user’s PC might end up worse or even damaged.

The main issue was whether prolonged POST/BOOT durations are typical or indicate faulty hardware. We’ve addressed that.
W
warzhell
08-01-2023, 04:21 PM #17

Taking the PC to sleep is a sensible approach. I configured it to do so after roughly three hours, since staying away that long increases the chance I missed shutting it down or left the house. Even in Windows 11, enabling sleep for the screen, storage, and system is straightforward. By default, it puts drives to sleep after about twenty minutes, which I found irritating, but that’s not the main concern.

The PC would still need to restart occasionally, but long boot times could be minimized.

I wouldn’t try to fix this issue excessively, particularly if BIOS updates are involved. There’s a risk of disrupting other components!

This PC functions adequately once the extended POST sequence finishes. This is partly due to the interaction between RAM and the motherboard, which sometimes traps users in a situation. It’s essentially a matter of luck with the hardware.

If BIOS adjustments could help, please share your suggestions. I believe the idea from someone like snemarch is worthwhile. Just remember that a user’s PC might end up worse or even damaged.

The main issue was whether prolonged POST/BOOT durations are typical or indicate faulty hardware. We’ve addressed that.

W
WhatsThePack
Member
215
08-01-2023, 09:04 PM
#18
Yeah – I haven't had any issues with flashing BIOS/UEFI, but I wouldn't suggest people do it just because a newer version exists. AM5 is a fresh platform, and it was (very) rough at first.

In my opinion, the way Intel and AMD describe XMP/EXPO might be a bit misleading. However, they suggest that keeping speeds just above the non-JEDEC standard is ideal, and if you skip the details, it's easy to overlook that it could still be considered overclocking without guaranteed results.
W
WhatsThePack
08-01-2023, 09:04 PM #18

Yeah – I haven't had any issues with flashing BIOS/UEFI, but I wouldn't suggest people do it just because a newer version exists. AM5 is a fresh platform, and it was (very) rough at first.

In my opinion, the way Intel and AMD describe XMP/EXPO might be a bit misleading. However, they suggest that keeping speeds just above the non-JEDEC standard is ideal, and if you skip the details, it's easy to overlook that it could still be considered overclocking without guaranteed results.

Pages (2): Previous 1 2